Safety of antiplatelet medication discontinuation more than 12 months after stent-assisted coil embolization: a non-interventional, multicenter, observational study.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Chang Hyeun Kim, Young Hoon Choi, Jae Sang Oh, Youngsoo Kim, Jong Kook Rhim, Jong Hyeon Mun, Jeongwook Lim, Jeongjun Lee, Hyun Ho Choi, Eun-Oh Jeong, Mun Chul Kim, Young Ha Kim, Sang Weon Lee, Young Dae Cho
{"title":"Safety of antiplatelet medication discontinuation more than 12 months after stent-assisted coil embolization: a non-interventional, multicenter, observational study.","authors":"Chang Hyeun Kim, Young Hoon Choi, Jae Sang Oh, Youngsoo Kim, Jong Kook Rhim, Jong Hyeon Mun, Jeongwook Lim, Jeongjun Lee, Hyun Ho Choi, Eun-Oh Jeong, Mun Chul Kim, Young Ha Kim, Sang Weon Lee, Young Dae Cho","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-023003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antiplatelet maintenance is essential to avoid ischemia following stent-assisted coiling (SAC) procedures. However, indications for antiplatelet medication discontinuation (AMD) remain controversial, and optimal timing of cessation has yet to be determined. Our goal, which we achieved through a multicenter, prospectively enrolled, non-interventional study, was to investigate the safety of AMD conducted more than 12 months after SAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrieved from the records of 495 consecutive patients prospectively enrolled at 10 institutions during a 3-year period (between January 2021 and December 2023). Each subject had discontinued antiplatelet therapy >12 months after SAC. Maintenance duration and cessation were both at physician discretion, based on patient clinical status. We investigated clinical outcomes for at least 6 months after AMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of patients engaged in AMD (292/495, 59.0%) were not at high risk for ischemia. Mean±SD time to AMD was 20.0±12.9 months after SAC. Treated aneurysms were largely confined to the internal carotid artery (332/495, 67.1%), followed by the anterior (95/495, 19.2%) and middle (43/495, 8.7%) cerebral arteries. A laser-cut open-cell stent was most often applied (60.5%); laser-cut closed-cell (22.2%) and braided closed-cell (17.3%) stents were used to a lesser extent. Four patients underwent double stenting. Despite sizeable (41.0%) high-risk group representation, there were no ischemic events in relation to AMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that AMD >12 months after SAC procedures is safe in patients who are not at high risk for ischemia. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-023003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antiplatelet maintenance is essential to avoid ischemia following stent-assisted coiling (SAC) procedures. However, indications for antiplatelet medication discontinuation (AMD) remain controversial, and optimal timing of cessation has yet to be determined. Our goal, which we achieved through a multicenter, prospectively enrolled, non-interventional study, was to investigate the safety of AMD conducted more than 12 months after SAC.

Methods: Data were retrieved from the records of 495 consecutive patients prospectively enrolled at 10 institutions during a 3-year period (between January 2021 and December 2023). Each subject had discontinued antiplatelet therapy >12 months after SAC. Maintenance duration and cessation were both at physician discretion, based on patient clinical status. We investigated clinical outcomes for at least 6 months after AMD.

Results: A majority of patients engaged in AMD (292/495, 59.0%) were not at high risk for ischemia. Mean±SD time to AMD was 20.0±12.9 months after SAC. Treated aneurysms were largely confined to the internal carotid artery (332/495, 67.1%), followed by the anterior (95/495, 19.2%) and middle (43/495, 8.7%) cerebral arteries. A laser-cut open-cell stent was most often applied (60.5%); laser-cut closed-cell (22.2%) and braided closed-cell (17.3%) stents were used to a lesser extent. Four patients underwent double stenting. Despite sizeable (41.0%) high-risk group representation, there were no ischemic events in relation to AMD.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that AMD >12 months after SAC procedures is safe in patients who are not at high risk for ischemia. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信