J S Guimbellot, Ashritha Chalamalla, Elizabeth Baker, K J Ryan, A Dowell, Saly Abouelenein, L E Bartlett, J Bergeron, G Turner, E P Acosta, K J Ramos
{"title":"Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor pharmacokinetics with concurrent tacrolimus administration after lung transplant.","authors":"J S Guimbellot, Ashritha Chalamalla, Elizabeth Baker, K J Ryan, A Dowell, Saly Abouelenein, L E Bartlett, J Bergeron, G Turner, E P Acosta, K J Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CFTR modulators in post-transplant people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are less frequently used due to uncertainty regarding effectiveness and interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a triple combination cystic fibrosis (CF) therapeutic with benefits in multiple organ systems where complications can impact lung transplant (LTx) outcomes, including malnutrition, diabetes, and sinus disease. ETI use in LTx recipients is variable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pharmacokinetics (PK) study of concentrations of ETI parent compounds and the four major metabolites (M23-ELX, M1-TEZ, M1-IVA, M6-IVA) in a prospective non-randomized observational study, with all transplant participants concomitantly taking tacrolimus for LTx immunosuppression and excluded if taking any other medication with known interactions (e.g., azole antifungals) and compared to a non-transplant group of pwCF. We completed non-compartmental analysis (NCA) for both groups and compared the transplant to non-transplant PK parameters, as well as to published data from the manufacturer for non-transplant pwCF. Area under the curve (AUC), average concentrations (C<sub>avg</sub>), minimum and maximum concentrations, clearance, and other parameters were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve transplant and fourteen non-transplant participants with CF completed the study. There were no significant differences between the mean values for any PK parameters for the transplant and non-transplant groups and no substantial differences in frequency of concentrations outside the therapeutic ranges in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest there are not significant differences in concentrations of ELX, TEZ, IVA, or their major human metabolites in LTx recipients compared to non-transplant pwCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: CFTR modulators in post-transplant people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are less frequently used due to uncertainty regarding effectiveness and interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a triple combination cystic fibrosis (CF) therapeutic with benefits in multiple organ systems where complications can impact lung transplant (LTx) outcomes, including malnutrition, diabetes, and sinus disease. ETI use in LTx recipients is variable.
Methods: We conducted a pharmacokinetics (PK) study of concentrations of ETI parent compounds and the four major metabolites (M23-ELX, M1-TEZ, M1-IVA, M6-IVA) in a prospective non-randomized observational study, with all transplant participants concomitantly taking tacrolimus for LTx immunosuppression and excluded if taking any other medication with known interactions (e.g., azole antifungals) and compared to a non-transplant group of pwCF. We completed non-compartmental analysis (NCA) for both groups and compared the transplant to non-transplant PK parameters, as well as to published data from the manufacturer for non-transplant pwCF. Area under the curve (AUC), average concentrations (Cavg), minimum and maximum concentrations, clearance, and other parameters were determined.
Results: Twelve transplant and fourteen non-transplant participants with CF completed the study. There were no significant differences between the mean values for any PK parameters for the transplant and non-transplant groups and no substantial differences in frequency of concentrations outside the therapeutic ranges in the two groups.
Conclusions: Our data suggest there are not significant differences in concentrations of ELX, TEZ, IVA, or their major human metabolites in LTx recipients compared to non-transplant pwCF.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.