Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor pharmacokinetics with concurrent tacrolimus administration after lung transplant.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
J S Guimbellot, Ashritha Chalamalla, Elizabeth Baker, K J Ryan, A Dowell, Saly Abouelenein, L E Bartlett, J Bergeron, G Turner, E P Acosta, K J Ramos
{"title":"Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor pharmacokinetics with concurrent tacrolimus administration after lung transplant.","authors":"J S Guimbellot, Ashritha Chalamalla, Elizabeth Baker, K J Ryan, A Dowell, Saly Abouelenein, L E Bartlett, J Bergeron, G Turner, E P Acosta, K J Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CFTR modulators in post-transplant people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are less frequently used due to uncertainty regarding effectiveness and interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a triple combination cystic fibrosis (CF) therapeutic with benefits in multiple organ systems where complications can impact lung transplant (LTx) outcomes, including malnutrition, diabetes, and sinus disease. ETI use in LTx recipients is variable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pharmacokinetics (PK) study of concentrations of ETI parent compounds and the four major metabolites (M23-ELX, M1-TEZ, M1-IVA, M6-IVA) in a prospective non-randomized observational study, with all transplant participants concomitantly taking tacrolimus for LTx immunosuppression and excluded if taking any other medication with known interactions (e.g., azole antifungals) and compared to a non-transplant group of pwCF. We completed non-compartmental analysis (NCA) for both groups and compared the transplant to non-transplant PK parameters, as well as to published data from the manufacturer for non-transplant pwCF. Area under the curve (AUC), average concentrations (C<sub>avg</sub>), minimum and maximum concentrations, clearance, and other parameters were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve transplant and fourteen non-transplant participants with CF completed the study. There were no significant differences between the mean values for any PK parameters for the transplant and non-transplant groups and no substantial differences in frequency of concentrations outside the therapeutic ranges in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest there are not significant differences in concentrations of ELX, TEZ, IVA, or their major human metabolites in LTx recipients compared to non-transplant pwCF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cystic Fibrosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2025.03.010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CFTR modulators in post-transplant people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) are less frequently used due to uncertainty regarding effectiveness and interactions with immunosuppressive agents. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is a triple combination cystic fibrosis (CF) therapeutic with benefits in multiple organ systems where complications can impact lung transplant (LTx) outcomes, including malnutrition, diabetes, and sinus disease. ETI use in LTx recipients is variable.

Methods: We conducted a pharmacokinetics (PK) study of concentrations of ETI parent compounds and the four major metabolites (M23-ELX, M1-TEZ, M1-IVA, M6-IVA) in a prospective non-randomized observational study, with all transplant participants concomitantly taking tacrolimus for LTx immunosuppression and excluded if taking any other medication with known interactions (e.g., azole antifungals) and compared to a non-transplant group of pwCF. We completed non-compartmental analysis (NCA) for both groups and compared the transplant to non-transplant PK parameters, as well as to published data from the manufacturer for non-transplant pwCF. Area under the curve (AUC), average concentrations (Cavg), minimum and maximum concentrations, clearance, and other parameters were determined.

Results: Twelve transplant and fourteen non-transplant participants with CF completed the study. There were no significant differences between the mean values for any PK parameters for the transplant and non-transplant groups and no substantial differences in frequency of concentrations outside the therapeutic ranges in the two groups.

Conclusions: Our data suggest there are not significant differences in concentrations of ELX, TEZ, IVA, or their major human metabolites in LTx recipients compared to non-transplant pwCF.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
13.50%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cystic Fibrosis is the official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. The journal is devoted to promoting the research and treatment of cystic fibrosis. To this end the journal publishes original scientific articles, editorials, case reports, short communications and other information relevant to cystic fibrosis. The journal also publishes news and articles concerning the activities and policies of the ECFS as well as those of other societies related the ECFS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信