{"title":"Equity and inclusion in prevention: Depression prevention in Black and White American youth.","authors":"Hayley D Seely, Patrick Pössel","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Depression is an ongoing public health issue impacting over 5 million American adolescents. Although prevention has been shown to be an effective strategy in reducing the incidence of depressive symptoms, depression prevention programs have been developed and tested in largely White populations. Thus, the effects of such programs in diverse groups are understudied, though research shows adapted versions are more beneficial for diverse populations than nonadapted programs. In this study, we sought to examine the effects of depression prevention in Black and White American youth.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Informed by youth focus groups, we adapted and implemented a program which previously benefited mainly White samples to benefit Black and White American inner-city high school students. Of the 425 youth who participated, 57.2% identified as Black and 42.8% identified as White. We randomized youth into two conditions-prevention and nonprevention control-and measured depressive symptoms over three semesters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found differential effects of prevention on Black and White American youth. For Black American youth, there was no difference between the two conditions at any of the waves of data collection. For White American youth, however, the prevention program worked as intended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given our findings and past research, it is essential to investigate possible causes for the differential effects of prevention to increase understanding and ensure positive effects of prevention for all youth. Additional ramifications and recommendations for future research and practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 4","pages":"307-316"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Depression is an ongoing public health issue impacting over 5 million American adolescents. Although prevention has been shown to be an effective strategy in reducing the incidence of depressive symptoms, depression prevention programs have been developed and tested in largely White populations. Thus, the effects of such programs in diverse groups are understudied, though research shows adapted versions are more beneficial for diverse populations than nonadapted programs. In this study, we sought to examine the effects of depression prevention in Black and White American youth.
Method: Informed by youth focus groups, we adapted and implemented a program which previously benefited mainly White samples to benefit Black and White American inner-city high school students. Of the 425 youth who participated, 57.2% identified as Black and 42.8% identified as White. We randomized youth into two conditions-prevention and nonprevention control-and measured depressive symptoms over three semesters.
Results: We found differential effects of prevention on Black and White American youth. For Black American youth, there was no difference between the two conditions at any of the waves of data collection. For White American youth, however, the prevention program worked as intended.
Conclusions: Given our findings and past research, it is essential to investigate possible causes for the differential effects of prevention to increase understanding and ensure positive effects of prevention for all youth. Additional ramifications and recommendations for future research and practice are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
