Microscopic single-tubule technique for spermatocelectomy in cases of spermatocele: a rarely used surgical method and ıts outcomes.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mehmet Sefa Altay, Ömer Uslu, Fevzi Bedir, Hüseyin Kocatürk, Ibrahim Karabulut, Banu Bedir, Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen, Isa Özbey
{"title":"Microscopic single-tubule technique for spermatocelectomy in cases of spermatocele: a rarely used surgical method and ıts outcomes.","authors":"Mehmet Sefa Altay, Ömer Uslu, Fevzi Bedir, Hüseyin Kocatürk, Ibrahim Karabulut, Banu Bedir, Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen, Isa Özbey","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04464-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to promote the microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy technique. The technique significantly reduces the risks of epididymal injury, infertility, and spermatocele recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2015 to June 2024, male patients aged between 18 and 50 years who underwent microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy with the intent to preserve fertility were included in this study. Data on patient age, preoperative and postoperative sperm analysis results, and complication rates were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v26 for Windows.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 40.93 ± 6.20 years. The average size of the spermatoceles was 6.44 ± 2 cm. The mean duration of the operation was 45.44 ± 8.82 min. While there was no statistically significant difference in sperm count and volume averages between preoperative and postoperative measurements, a statistically significant was observed in sperm motility. In terms of complications, 3.7% of the patients (n = 1) developed an infection. No epididymal bleeding or iatrogenic tubule opening was detected under the microscope. None of the patients experienced bleeding, spermatocele recurrence, testicular atrophy, or sperm granuloma. Pathological evaluations revealed no epididymal tissue in any of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy reduces the risk of epididymal injury and testicular atrophy, and it is associated with low complication rates. Particularly in male patients desiring fertility preservation, microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy offers high success rates and low complication rates and should be considered the preferred surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04464-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to promote the microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy technique. The technique significantly reduces the risks of epididymal injury, infertility, and spermatocele recurrence rates.

Methods: From January 2015 to June 2024, male patients aged between 18 and 50 years who underwent microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy with the intent to preserve fertility were included in this study. Data on patient age, preoperative and postoperative sperm analysis results, and complication rates were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v26 for Windows.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 40.93 ± 6.20 years. The average size of the spermatoceles was 6.44 ± 2 cm. The mean duration of the operation was 45.44 ± 8.82 min. While there was no statistically significant difference in sperm count and volume averages between preoperative and postoperative measurements, a statistically significant was observed in sperm motility. In terms of complications, 3.7% of the patients (n = 1) developed an infection. No epididymal bleeding or iatrogenic tubule opening was detected under the microscope. None of the patients experienced bleeding, spermatocele recurrence, testicular atrophy, or sperm granuloma. Pathological evaluations revealed no epididymal tissue in any of the cases.

Conclusion: Microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy reduces the risk of epididymal injury and testicular atrophy, and it is associated with low complication rates. Particularly in male patients desiring fertility preservation, microscopic single-tubule spermatocelectomy offers high success rates and low complication rates and should be considered the preferred surgical technique.

目的:本研究旨在推广显微镜下单管精子切除术。该技术可大大降低附睾损伤、不育和精索静脉曲张复发率的风险:本研究纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2024 年 6 月期间,年龄在 18 岁至 50 岁之间、为保留生育能力而接受显微镜下单输精管精子切除术的男性患者。研究记录了患者年龄、术前和术后精子分析结果以及并发症发生率等数据。统计分析使用 Windows 版社会科学统计软件包 (SPSS) v26 进行:患者的平均年龄为(40.93 ± 6.20)岁。精索畸形的平均大小为 6.44 ± 2 厘米。平均手术时间为 45.44 ± 8.82 分钟。虽然术前和术后测量的精子数量和平均体积在统计学上没有显著差异,但精子活力在统计学上有显著差异。在并发症方面,3.7%的患者(n = 1)发生了感染。显微镜下未发现附睾出血或先天性输卵管开口。没有一名患者出现出血、精索静脉曲张复发、睾丸萎缩或精子肉芽肿。病理评估显示,所有病例均未发现附睾组织:结论:显微镜下单管精子切除术可降低附睾损伤和睾丸萎缩的风险,而且并发症发生率低。特别是对于希望保留生育能力的男性患者,显微镜下单精管精子切除术的成功率高、并发症发生率低,应被视为首选手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信