Engaging and supporting standardized patients involved in equity-seeking healthcare training: a qualitative study.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nicole Last, Urmi Sheth, Amy Keuhl, Aaron Geekie-Sousa, Derya Uzelli Yilmaz, Sandra Monteiro, Matt Sibbald
{"title":"Engaging and supporting standardized patients involved in equity-seeking healthcare training: a qualitative study.","authors":"Nicole Last, Urmi Sheth, Amy Keuhl, Aaron Geekie-Sousa, Derya Uzelli Yilmaz, Sandra Monteiro, Matt Sibbald","doi":"10.5116/ijme.67ab.596e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore the perspectives of standardized patients previously involved in equity-seeking healthcare training simulation activities to better understand how stakeholders can engage and support standardized patients in the delivery of educational opportunities for healthcare professionals related to equity, diversity, and inclusivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative research study was conducted utilizing semi-structured interviews with persons (N=15) who self-identified as being involved in the development and/or the delivery of simulations related to equity, diversity, and/or inclusion. Participants were recruited via email using internal and public lists for standardized patient programs and through snowball sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analyzed qualitatively in an iterative coding process, anchored by direct content analysis methodology, and informed by three theoretical perspectives: the standardized patient journey, psychological safety, and empowerment theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We constructed three main themes: (1) safety should be prioritized throughout the journey; (2) empowerment is key to engagement; and (3) standardized patient trainers are central connectors for safety and empowerment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the perspectives of standardized patients, this study has provided insight on strategies to engage and support those participating in equity-seeking simulations. Focused attention on safety and empowerment is warranted, with trainers having a critical role in empowering standardized patients to succeed in equity-seeking simulations. Future research should continue to explore best practices surrounding engaging, supporting, and retaining individuals involved in equity-seeking healthcare training, including comprehensive training for trainers on how to ensure, maintain, and restore standardized patients' psychological safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"16 ","pages":"64-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.67ab.596e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the perspectives of standardized patients previously involved in equity-seeking healthcare training simulation activities to better understand how stakeholders can engage and support standardized patients in the delivery of educational opportunities for healthcare professionals related to equity, diversity, and inclusivity.

Methods: A qualitative research study was conducted utilizing semi-structured interviews with persons (N=15) who self-identified as being involved in the development and/or the delivery of simulations related to equity, diversity, and/or inclusion. Participants were recruited via email using internal and public lists for standardized patient programs and through snowball sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analyzed qualitatively in an iterative coding process, anchored by direct content analysis methodology, and informed by three theoretical perspectives: the standardized patient journey, psychological safety, and empowerment theory.

Results: We constructed three main themes: (1) safety should be prioritized throughout the journey; (2) empowerment is key to engagement; and (3) standardized patient trainers are central connectors for safety and empowerment.

Conclusions: Through the perspectives of standardized patients, this study has provided insight on strategies to engage and support those participating in equity-seeking simulations. Focused attention on safety and empowerment is warranted, with trainers having a critical role in empowering standardized patients to succeed in equity-seeking simulations. Future research should continue to explore best practices surrounding engaging, supporting, and retaining individuals involved in equity-seeking healthcare training, including comprehensive training for trainers on how to ensure, maintain, and restore standardized patients' psychological safety.

参与和支持参与公平寻求医疗保健培训的标准化患者:一项定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨标准化患者先前参与寻求公平的医疗保健培训模拟活动的观点,以更好地了解利益相关者如何参与和支持标准化患者为医疗保健专业人员提供有关公平、多样性和包容性的教育机会。方法:采用半结构化访谈对自认为参与开发和/或交付与公平、多样性和/或包容性相关的模拟的人员(N=15)进行定性研究。参与者通过电子邮件招募,使用标准化患者计划的内部和公开名单,并通过滚雪球抽样。访谈被逐字记录和转录,并在迭代编码过程中进行定性分析,以直接内容分析方法为基础,并以三个理论视角为依据:标准化的患者旅程、心理安全和赋权理论。结果:构建了三个主题:(1)全程安全优先;(2)赋权是参与的关键;(3)标准化的患者培训师是安全和授权的中心连接器。结论:通过标准化患者的视角,本研究为参与公平寻求模拟的参与者提供了参与和支持策略。重点关注安全和授权是必要的,培训师在授权标准化患者在寻求公平模拟中取得成功方面发挥着关键作用。未来的研究应继续探索吸引、支持和留住参与公平医疗培训的个人的最佳实践,包括对培训师进行关于如何确保、维护和恢复标准化患者心理安全的综合培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信