Prevalence, Patterns, and Determinants of Workplace Violence Among Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251325405
Bikila Balis, Usmael Jibro, Nesredin Ahmed, Efrem Lelisa, Dawit Firdisa, Magarsa Lami
{"title":"Prevalence, Patterns, and Determinants of Workplace Violence Among Healthcare Providers in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bikila Balis, Usmael Jibro, Nesredin Ahmed, Efrem Lelisa, Dawit Firdisa, Magarsa Lami","doi":"10.1177/11786329251325405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace violence remains a persistent health and occupational issue, but stakeholders often lack sufficient evidence to guide effective mitigation strategies. This review aims to ascertain the prevalence and determinants of workplace violence among healthcare providers in Ethiopia, where the issue is under-researched.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search included studies conducted in Ethiopia, regardless of publication year, that reported workplace violence among healthcare providers using PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences, EMBASE, CINHAL, Google Scholar, university repositories, and reference. After each author independently evaluated a study for inclusion, data was extracted, and disagreements were discussed and settled. A random-effects meta-analysis approach was used to evaluate the pooled prevalence, patterns, and determinants of workplace violence at 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> and <i>P</i>-value were used to evaluate the heterogeneity. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to assess the difference by study-level characteristics. Additionally, to evaluate the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6986 participants from 17 eligible studies were included in this study. Of the participants, 56% (95% CI: 48%-63%) reported having experienced any form of workplace violence. Verbal abuse accounted for 57% (95% CI: 49-65%), sexual harassment for 56% (95% CI: 48-65%), physical violence for 55% (95% CI: 46-63%), and bullying/mobbing for 51% (95% CI: 40-62%), according to the participants' reports of workplace violence. Working night hours (AOR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.20-1.93), being female (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.07-3.41), being single (AOR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.44-6.73), working in an emergency department (AOR: 3.87; 95% CI: 2.33-5.41), and consuming alcohol (AOR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.10-4.28) were all associated with a higher risk of workplace violence. Egger's test and the funnel plot revealed no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled odds ratios were stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the comparatively high prevalence of workplace violence and its various types among healthcare providers, a multilevel intervention strategy was necessary to address and lessen its effects. In order to make the workplace safer and avoid negative consequences for health care providers as well as the larger healthcare system, this strategy should incorporate both individual-level strategies and targeted policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251325405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251325405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workplace violence remains a persistent health and occupational issue, but stakeholders often lack sufficient evidence to guide effective mitigation strategies. This review aims to ascertain the prevalence and determinants of workplace violence among healthcare providers in Ethiopia, where the issue is under-researched.

Methods: The search included studies conducted in Ethiopia, regardless of publication year, that reported workplace violence among healthcare providers using PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences, EMBASE, CINHAL, Google Scholar, university repositories, and reference. After each author independently evaluated a study for inclusion, data was extracted, and disagreements were discussed and settled. A random-effects meta-analysis approach was used to evaluate the pooled prevalence, patterns, and determinants of workplace violence at 95% confidence intervals. Additionally, the I 2 and P-value were used to evaluate the heterogeneity. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to assess the difference by study-level characteristics. Additionally, to evaluate the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were performed.

Results: A total of 6986 participants from 17 eligible studies were included in this study. Of the participants, 56% (95% CI: 48%-63%) reported having experienced any form of workplace violence. Verbal abuse accounted for 57% (95% CI: 49-65%), sexual harassment for 56% (95% CI: 48-65%), physical violence for 55% (95% CI: 46-63%), and bullying/mobbing for 51% (95% CI: 40-62%), according to the participants' reports of workplace violence. Working night hours (AOR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.20-1.93), being female (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.07-3.41), being single (AOR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.44-6.73), working in an emergency department (AOR: 3.87; 95% CI: 2.33-5.41), and consuming alcohol (AOR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.10-4.28) were all associated with a higher risk of workplace violence. Egger's test and the funnel plot revealed no publication bias, and sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled odds ratios were stable.

Conclusion: Given the comparatively high prevalence of workplace violence and its various types among healthcare providers, a multilevel intervention strategy was necessary to address and lessen its effects. In order to make the workplace safer and avoid negative consequences for health care providers as well as the larger healthcare system, this strategy should incorporate both individual-level strategies and targeted policies.

埃塞俄比亚医疗服务提供者工作场所暴力的流行、模式和决定因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:工作场所暴力仍然是一个持续存在的健康和职业问题,但利益攸关方往往缺乏足够的证据来指导有效的缓解战略。本综述旨在确定埃塞俄比亚医疗服务提供者工作场所暴力的流行程度和决定因素,埃塞俄比亚对这一问题的研究不足。方法:检索包括在埃塞俄比亚进行的研究,无论发表年份如何,使用PubMed、SCOPUS、Web of Sciences、EMBASE、CINHAL、谷歌Scholar、大学知识库和参考文献报道了医疗保健提供者的工作场所暴力。在每位作者独立评估一项研究是否纳入后,提取数据,讨论并解决分歧。采用随机效应荟萃分析方法在95%置信区间内评估工作场所暴力的综合患病率、模式和决定因素。此外,使用i2和p值来评估异质性。采用meta回归和亚组分析来评估研究水平特征的差异。此外,为了评估汇总值对异常值和发表偏倚的稳定性,进行了敏感性分析和漏斗图。结果:17项符合条件的研究共纳入6986名受试者。在参与者中,56%(95%置信区间:48%-63%)报告称经历过任何形式的工作场所暴力。根据参与者对工作场所暴力的报告,言语虐待占57% (95% CI: 49-65%),性骚扰占56% (95% CI: 48-65%),身体暴力占55% (95% CI: 46-63%),欺凌/暴徒占51% (95% CI: 40-62%)。夜间工作时间(AOR: 1.57;95% CI: 1.20-1.93),为女性(AOR: 2.24;95% CI: 1.07-3.41),单身(AOR: 4.58;95% CI: 2.44-6.73),在急诊科工作(AOR: 3.87;95% CI: 2.33-5.41)和饮酒(AOR: 2.69;95%可信区间:1.10-4.28)都与更高的工作场所暴力风险相关。Egger检验和漏斗图显示无发表偏倚,敏感性分析显示合并优势比稳定。结论:鉴于工作场所暴力的患病率相对较高,并且在医疗服务提供者中存在各种类型的暴力,有必要采取多层次的干预策略来解决和减轻其影响。为了使工作场所更安全,避免对卫生保健提供者和更大的卫生保健系统产生负面影响,这一战略应结合个人层面的战略和有针对性的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信