Comparison of two nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children with Japanese encephalitis: a causal inference of clinical outcomes and implications for optimized management.
Yilei Shen, Lijuan Xu, Tian Tan, Wei Cao, Yong Zhao, Yue Feng, Xia Li, Yongfang Liu, Yingting Luo, Lin Kong
{"title":"Comparison of two nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children with Japanese encephalitis: a causal inference of clinical outcomes and implications for optimized management.","authors":"Yilei Shen, Lijuan Xu, Tian Tan, Wei Cao, Yong Zhao, Yue Feng, Xia Li, Yongfang Liu, Yingting Luo, Lin Kong","doi":"10.1186/s13052-025-01922-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study used two nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools to explore the causal relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay and cost), as well as clinical results (incidence of sequelae), in hospitalized children with Japanese encephalitis (JE). The goal is to screen for a more suitable nutrition risk tool for JE reveal the underlying mechanisms, accurately quantify the impact, and provide a reliable basis for optimizing clinical management and reducing the burden of the disease in affected children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The classical Screening Tool for Risk of Nutrition in Growth Kids (STRONGkids) and Screening Tool for Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP) were utilized to evaluate the nutritional risk of the children. A heatmap analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between variables influencing the STRONGkids score and STAMP score. Subsequently, a decision tree was employed to identify the main factors influencing the STRONGkids score and STAMP score. Finally, causal inference was employed to calculate the causal effects between the NRS score, clinical outcomes, and clinical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysphagia was the most significant factors affecting STRONGKids scores, and the weight and height was the most significant factors affecting STAMP scores. Causal analysis revealed that for every unit increase in the severity of JE type, the STRONGkids score increased by 0.515 units, and 1.339 units for STAMP. Moreover, the presence of dysphagia led to a 1.944-unit increase in the STRONGkids score, and 1.497-unit for STAMP. Additionally, for every unit increase in the STRONGkids score, the length of hospital stay increased by 2.541 days, and hospitalization costs increased by $612.507. Similarly, for every unit increase in the STAMP score, the length of hospital stay increased by 1.571 days, and hospitalization costs increased by $425.595.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on decision tree, causal analysis and the actual situation of SNI, the internal structural setup of the STAMP tool is more suitable for screening pediatric patients with JE, making it a more reasonable choice for this purpose when compared to STRONGkids.</p>","PeriodicalId":14511,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"51 1","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-025-01922-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study used two nutritional risk screening (NRS) tools to explore the causal relationship between nutritional risk and clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay and cost), as well as clinical results (incidence of sequelae), in hospitalized children with Japanese encephalitis (JE). The goal is to screen for a more suitable nutrition risk tool for JE reveal the underlying mechanisms, accurately quantify the impact, and provide a reliable basis for optimizing clinical management and reducing the burden of the disease in affected children.
Methods: The classical Screening Tool for Risk of Nutrition in Growth Kids (STRONGkids) and Screening Tool for Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP) were utilized to evaluate the nutritional risk of the children. A heatmap analysis was conducted to investigate the correlation between variables influencing the STRONGkids score and STAMP score. Subsequently, a decision tree was employed to identify the main factors influencing the STRONGkids score and STAMP score. Finally, causal inference was employed to calculate the causal effects between the NRS score, clinical outcomes, and clinical results.
Results: Dysphagia was the most significant factors affecting STRONGKids scores, and the weight and height was the most significant factors affecting STAMP scores. Causal analysis revealed that for every unit increase in the severity of JE type, the STRONGkids score increased by 0.515 units, and 1.339 units for STAMP. Moreover, the presence of dysphagia led to a 1.944-unit increase in the STRONGkids score, and 1.497-unit for STAMP. Additionally, for every unit increase in the STRONGkids score, the length of hospital stay increased by 2.541 days, and hospitalization costs increased by $612.507. Similarly, for every unit increase in the STAMP score, the length of hospital stay increased by 1.571 days, and hospitalization costs increased by $425.595.
Conclusions: Based on decision tree, causal analysis and the actual situation of SNI, the internal structural setup of the STAMP tool is more suitable for screening pediatric patients with JE, making it a more reasonable choice for this purpose when compared to STRONGkids.
期刊介绍:
Italian Journal of Pediatrics is an open access peer-reviewed journal that includes all aspects of pediatric medicine. The journal also covers health service and public health research that addresses primary care issues.
The journal provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.
Italian Journal of Pediatrics, which commenced in 1975 as Rivista Italiana di Pediatria, provides a high-quality forum for pediatricians and other healthcare professionals to report and discuss up-to-the-minute research and expert reviews in the field of pediatric medicine. The journal will continue to develop the range of articles published to enable this invaluable resource to stay at the forefront of the field.