Effects of neostigmine on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnins.2025.1464272
Xuelei Zhou, Linlin Chen, Li Zhao, Wei Mao, Xianchun Liu, Longyi Zhang, Ying Xie, Linji Li
{"title":"Effects of neostigmine on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xuelei Zhou, Linlin Chen, Li Zhao, Wei Mao, Xianchun Liu, Longyi Zhang, Ying Xie, Linji Li","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2025.1464272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND) is a common and serious complication following surgery. Neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor commonly administered during anesthesia to reverse residual neuromuscular blockade, has been suggested in recent studies to potentially reduce the incidence of PND. However, findings have been inconsistent across studies. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of neostigmine on PND.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, SinoMed, and CNKI, to identify all relevant studies for inclusion. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in our analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies were included in this analysis, consisting of 8 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies. The incidence of PND was significantly lower in the neostigmine group compared to the control group (log(OR): -0.54, 95% CI [-1.04, -0. 05]; OR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.35, 0.95], <i>p</i> = 0.03, I<sup>2</sup> = 81.95%). Sensitivity analysis led to the exclusion of one cohort study. Consequently, the final meta-analysis comprised 10 studies, encompassing a total of 50,881 participants. The results indicate that the incidence of PND was significantly lower in the neostigmine group compared to the control group (log(OR):-0. 27, 95% CI [-0.47, -0. 08]; OR: 0.76, 95% CI: [0.62, 0.91], <i>p</i> = 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 2.50%). However, Meta-analysis of RCTs and cohort studies showed no significant difference. Subgroup analysis indicated that neostigmine reduced the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNCR), but its impact on POD was unclear, with no significant association to nausea and vomiting. These findings suggest that neostigmine may reduce the risk of PND, but caution is needed in interpretation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neostigmine may have a potential positive effect in reducing the incidence of PND. However, no statistical difference was observed when meta-analyses were performed separately for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Given the limited number of studies available and the limitations of the current research, further investigation is needed to clarify the impact of neostigmine on PND.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024537647, Identifier CRD42024537647.</p>","PeriodicalId":12639,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1464272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1464272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PND) is a common and serious complication following surgery. Neostigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor commonly administered during anesthesia to reverse residual neuromuscular blockade, has been suggested in recent studies to potentially reduce the incidence of PND. However, findings have been inconsistent across studies. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of neostigmine on PND.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, EmBase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, SinoMed, and CNKI, to identify all relevant studies for inclusion. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies in our analysis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies.

Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this analysis, consisting of 8 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies. The incidence of PND was significantly lower in the neostigmine group compared to the control group (log(OR): -0.54, 95% CI [-1.04, -0. 05]; OR: 0.58, 95% CI: [0.35, 0.95], p = 0.03, I2 = 81.95%). Sensitivity analysis led to the exclusion of one cohort study. Consequently, the final meta-analysis comprised 10 studies, encompassing a total of 50,881 participants. The results indicate that the incidence of PND was significantly lower in the neostigmine group compared to the control group (log(OR):-0. 27, 95% CI [-0.47, -0. 08]; OR: 0.76, 95% CI: [0.62, 0.91], p = 0.01, I2 = 2.50%). However, Meta-analysis of RCTs and cohort studies showed no significant difference. Subgroup analysis indicated that neostigmine reduced the incidence of delayed neurocognitive recovery (dNCR), but its impact on POD was unclear, with no significant association to nausea and vomiting. These findings suggest that neostigmine may reduce the risk of PND, but caution is needed in interpretation.

Conclusion: Neostigmine may have a potential positive effect in reducing the incidence of PND. However, no statistical difference was observed when meta-analyses were performed separately for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Given the limited number of studies available and the limitations of the current research, further investigation is needed to clarify the impact of neostigmine on PND.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024537647, Identifier CRD42024537647.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
2070
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Technology is devoted to the convergence between neurobiology and quantum-, nano- and micro-sciences. In our vision, this interdisciplinary approach should go beyond the technological development of sophisticated methods and should contribute in generating a genuine change in our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信