Anthony Russell Villanueva, Donnah de Leon, Patrick James Encarnacion, Elaine Cunanan, Amor Patrice Estabillo, Christianne Jade Gonzales, Miharu Jay Kimwell, Marizel Mallari-Catungal, Mary Joy Taneo, Dianne Danielle Tan-Lim, Richard Henry Perlas Tiongco, Jennifer Ivy Togonon-Leaño, Maria Rhodora De Lara-Valenzona, Danny Yu, Arlene Cabotaje Crisostomo, Precious Juzenda Montilla
{"title":"Cost-of-illness analysis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) management in the Philippines.","authors":"Anthony Russell Villanueva, Donnah de Leon, Patrick James Encarnacion, Elaine Cunanan, Amor Patrice Estabillo, Christianne Jade Gonzales, Miharu Jay Kimwell, Marizel Mallari-Catungal, Mary Joy Taneo, Dianne Danielle Tan-Lim, Richard Henry Perlas Tiongco, Jennifer Ivy Togonon-Leaño, Maria Rhodora De Lara-Valenzona, Danny Yu, Arlene Cabotaje Crisostomo, Precious Juzenda Montilla","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2481766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To conduct the first comprehensive cost-of-illness analysis for chronic kidney disease (CKD) management in the Philippines, estimating direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs across all disease stages and renal replacement therapies (RRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A combined top-down and bottom-up quantitative approach was employed. Cost data were collected through facility surveys, literature reviews, and expert panel input. The analysis included cost estimated for both non-diabetic and diabetic CKD scenarios across all stages and RRT modalities. Direct medical costs, transportation costs, and productivity losses were calculated for each CKD stage and RRT option.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual costs for CKD management increased progressively with disease advancement, ranging from PHP 44,610.36 to PHP 116,590.24 for non-diabetic patients and PHP 46,451.88 to PHP 120,948.12 for diabetic patients, excluding complication-related expenses. Significant cost increases were observed between stages G2-G3a and G3b-G4. Analysis of RRT showed comparable annual direct medical costs across modalities (∼PHP 401,000-560,000), with differences primarily observed in annual direct non-medical and indirect costs, which were lower in transplant recipients compared to patients on maintenance dialysis (PHP 37,920-246,480 for dialysis; PHP 3,160 for KT recipients).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study primarily focused on urban and semi-urban healthcare facilities, potentially limiting generalizability to rural areas. Long-term cost trajectories and quality-of-life measures were not captured due to the cross-sectional nature of the data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis provides crucial evidence supporting early detection and intervention strategies in CKD management. It suggests the promotion of peritoneal dialysis as a cost-effective first-line therapy and highlights the long-term economic benefits of kidney transplantation. The findings have significant implications for health policy and clinical practice in the Philippines, offering a foundation for evidence-informed decision-making to improve CKD management sustainability and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"494-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2481766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To conduct the first comprehensive cost-of-illness analysis for chronic kidney disease (CKD) management in the Philippines, estimating direct medical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs across all disease stages and renal replacement therapies (RRT).
Methods: A combined top-down and bottom-up quantitative approach was employed. Cost data were collected through facility surveys, literature reviews, and expert panel input. The analysis included cost estimated for both non-diabetic and diabetic CKD scenarios across all stages and RRT modalities. Direct medical costs, transportation costs, and productivity losses were calculated for each CKD stage and RRT option.
Results: Annual costs for CKD management increased progressively with disease advancement, ranging from PHP 44,610.36 to PHP 116,590.24 for non-diabetic patients and PHP 46,451.88 to PHP 120,948.12 for diabetic patients, excluding complication-related expenses. Significant cost increases were observed between stages G2-G3a and G3b-G4. Analysis of RRT showed comparable annual direct medical costs across modalities (∼PHP 401,000-560,000), with differences primarily observed in annual direct non-medical and indirect costs, which were lower in transplant recipients compared to patients on maintenance dialysis (PHP 37,920-246,480 for dialysis; PHP 3,160 for KT recipients).
Limitations: The study primarily focused on urban and semi-urban healthcare facilities, potentially limiting generalizability to rural areas. Long-term cost trajectories and quality-of-life measures were not captured due to the cross-sectional nature of the data.
Conclusions: This analysis provides crucial evidence supporting early detection and intervention strategies in CKD management. It suggests the promotion of peritoneal dialysis as a cost-effective first-line therapy and highlights the long-term economic benefits of kidney transplantation. The findings have significant implications for health policy and clinical practice in the Philippines, offering a foundation for evidence-informed decision-making to improve CKD management sustainability and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience