Implementation of Guideline-Based Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Perioperative Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis: A Pre-Post Study Guided by CFIR-ERIC.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S496310
Xinrui Wang, Ying Liu, Yi Zhang, Zhuo Ma, Zhuoling An
{"title":"Implementation of Guideline-Based Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors for Perioperative Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis: A Pre-Post Study Guided by CFIR-ERIC.","authors":"Xinrui Wang, Ying Liu, Yi Zhang, Zhuo Ma, Zhuoling An","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S496310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The overuse and misuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in perioperative patients for stress ulcers prophylactic (SUP) is crucial. This study evaluated the impact of a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (CFIR-ERIC)-guided intervention on the rational use of PPIs in a perioperative setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center pre-post study was conducted at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between April and November 2023. All hospitalized patients who used perioperative PPIs for SUP were included. Cases post-intervention were defined as the intervention group and were propensity score-matched with pre-intervention cases, which was defined as the control group. The intervention strategies were developed by following the updated CFIR framework and employing CFIR-ERIC strategies. Outcomes included rational use of PPIs, reasons for irrational use, total hospitalization and drug costs, PPI duration, costs, and average defined daily dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1122 cases were included in the intervention group and control group after propensity score matching, respectively. The intervention group showed significant improved rate of rational PPI use (81.7% vs 42.0%, p<0.001). Rates of non-indication use, inappropriate dosage and administration, drug selection, and administration route were significantly reduced (all p<0.05). Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment, severe trauma or multiple injuries, severe infection or sepsis were the three most prevalent severe risk factors among patients, with 46.7% and 29.5% of the two groups, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two groups in total hospitalization costs (¥55,672.84 vs ¥57,021.73, p=0.621) and total drug costs (¥3005.38 vs ¥3260.98, p=0.206). Additionally, PPI costs (¥7.44 vs ¥93.70, p<0.001) and defined daily dose (7.00 vs 8.00, p<0.001) were significantly lower in the intervention group. We also observed a downward trend in PPI duration (6.00 days vs 5.00 days, p=0.075).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CFIR-ERIC-guided intervention effectively improved the rational use of PPIs for perioperative SUP, resulting in significant reductions in both the PPI duration and costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"635-645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S496310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The overuse and misuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in perioperative patients for stress ulcers prophylactic (SUP) is crucial. This study evaluated the impact of a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (CFIR-ERIC)-guided intervention on the rational use of PPIs in a perioperative setting.

Methods: A single-center pre-post study was conducted at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital between April and November 2023. All hospitalized patients who used perioperative PPIs for SUP were included. Cases post-intervention were defined as the intervention group and were propensity score-matched with pre-intervention cases, which was defined as the control group. The intervention strategies were developed by following the updated CFIR framework and employing CFIR-ERIC strategies. Outcomes included rational use of PPIs, reasons for irrational use, total hospitalization and drug costs, PPI duration, costs, and average defined daily dose.

Results: 1122 cases were included in the intervention group and control group after propensity score matching, respectively. The intervention group showed significant improved rate of rational PPI use (81.7% vs 42.0%, p<0.001). Rates of non-indication use, inappropriate dosage and administration, drug selection, and administration route were significantly reduced (all p<0.05). Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment, severe trauma or multiple injuries, severe infection or sepsis were the three most prevalent severe risk factors among patients, with 46.7% and 29.5% of the two groups, respectively. We found no significant differences between the two groups in total hospitalization costs (¥55,672.84 vs ¥57,021.73, p=0.621) and total drug costs (¥3005.38 vs ¥3260.98, p=0.206). Additionally, PPI costs (¥7.44 vs ¥93.70, p<0.001) and defined daily dose (7.00 vs 8.00, p<0.001) were significantly lower in the intervention group. We also observed a downward trend in PPI duration (6.00 days vs 5.00 days, p=0.075).

Conclusion: The CFIR-ERIC-guided intervention effectively improved the rational use of PPIs for perioperative SUP, resulting in significant reductions in both the PPI duration and costs.

基于指南的质子泵抑制剂用于围手术期应激性溃疡预防的实施:一项由cfr - eric指导的前后研究。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)在围手术期预防应激性溃疡(SUP)患者中的过度使用和误用是至关重要的。本研究评估了实施综合框架研究专家建议实施变革(cfr - eric)指导干预对围手术期PPIs合理使用的影响。方法:于2023年4 - 11月在北京朝阳医院进行单中心前后研究。所有使用围手术期PPIs治疗SUP的住院患者均被纳入研究。将干预后的病例定义为干预组,并与干预前的病例进行倾向评分匹配,干预前的病例定义为对照组。干预策略的制定遵循更新的CFIR框架,并采用CFIR- eric策略。结果包括PPI的合理使用、不合理使用的原因、总住院和药物费用、PPI持续时间、费用和平均限定日剂量。结果:倾向评分匹配后,干预组和对照组各纳入1122例。干预组PPI合理使用率显著提高(81.7% vs 42.0%)。结论:cfir - eric引导的干预有效提高了围手术期SUP PPI的合理使用,PPI持续时间和费用均显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信