Establishment of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and Exploration of the Association Between Oral Frailty and Sarcopenia.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Chen-Cheng Yang, Hsiang-Tai Chen, Katsuya Iijima, Tomoki Tanaka, Chia-Yen Dai, Sang-Ju Yu, Hung-Yi Chuang
{"title":"Establishment of a Mandarin Chinese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 and Exploration of the Association Between Oral Frailty and Sarcopenia.","authors":"Chen-Cheng Yang, Hsiang-Tai Chen, Katsuya Iijima, Tomoki Tanaka, Chia-Yen Dai, Sang-Ju Yu, Hung-Yi Chuang","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10020047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The aim of our study was to introduce a Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty assessment and explore the relationship between oral frailty and sarcopenia. A total of 409 elders (171 male, 238 female) participated in surveys using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. <b>Method:</b> The translation of the Mandarin Chinese version of OFI-8 adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) reporting guidelines. The eight-item questionnaire assessed tooth status, oral function, and other subjective measures. Additionally, sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F questionnaire. <b>Result:</b> Among the participants, 195 participants were classified as non-oral frailty and 214 participants were oral frailty. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, and scores on the SARC-F questionnaire between the non-oral frailty and oral frailty populations. In logistic regression model, oral frailty showed a significant and positive association with the SARC-F score (adjusted odds ratio 2.130, 95% confidence interval 1.580-2.872, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001), even after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and education level. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study has developed a valuable Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty screening questionnaire, the OFI-8. Oral frailty is significantly and positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia, particularly among the elderly, males, and those with lower education levels. This measure proves to be practical for assessing oral health status in the Chinese community, promoting oral frailty research within the Mandarin Chinese population, and addressing the challenges associated with defining oral frailty in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10020047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to introduce a Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty assessment and explore the relationship between oral frailty and sarcopenia. A total of 409 elders (171 male, 238 female) participated in surveys using the Mandarin Chinese version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Method: The translation of the Mandarin Chinese version of OFI-8 adhered to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) reporting guidelines. The eight-item questionnaire assessed tooth status, oral function, and other subjective measures. Additionally, sarcopenia was evaluated using the SARC-F questionnaire. Result: Among the participants, 195 participants were classified as non-oral frailty and 214 participants were oral frailty. Significant differences were observed in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, and scores on the SARC-F questionnaire between the non-oral frailty and oral frailty populations. In logistic regression model, oral frailty showed a significant and positive association with the SARC-F score (adjusted odds ratio 2.130, 95% confidence interval 1.580-2.872, p-value < 0.001), even after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and education level. Conclusion: This study has developed a valuable Mandarin Chinese version of the oral frailty screening questionnaire, the OFI-8. Oral frailty is significantly and positively associated with a higher risk of sarcopenia, particularly among the elderly, males, and those with lower education levels. This measure proves to be practical for assessing oral health status in the Chinese community, promoting oral frailty research within the Mandarin Chinese population, and addressing the challenges associated with defining oral frailty in future studies.

《口腔虚弱指数-8》中文版的建立及口腔虚弱与肌肉减少症的关系探讨。
目的:介绍一种普通话版本的口腔虚弱评估,探讨口腔虚弱与肌肉减少症的关系。采用普通话版口腔机能指数-8 (OFI-8)对台湾高雄市409名老年人(男性171人,女性238人)进行了问卷调查。方法:按照《基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准》(COSMIN)报告指南翻译OFI-8的中文版本。问卷共8项,评估了牙齿状况、口腔功能和其他主观指标。此外,使用SARC-F问卷评估肌肉减少症。结果:非口腔虚弱195人,口腔虚弱214人。非口腔虚弱人群和口腔虚弱人群在年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、受教育程度和SARC-F问卷得分方面存在显著差异。在logistic回归模型中,即使在调整了年龄、性别、BMI和教育水平后,口腔虚弱仍与SARC-F评分呈显著正相关(校正优势比2.130,95%置信区间1.580-2.872,p值< 0.001)。结论:本研究开发了一份有价值的汉语版口腔虚弱筛查问卷OFI-8。口腔脆弱与肌肉减少症的高风险显著正相关,尤其是在老年人、男性和受教育程度较低的人群中。事实证明,这一措施对于评估中国社区的口腔健康状况、促进中国普通话人群的口腔虚弱研究以及解决未来研究中与定义口腔虚弱相关的挑战是实用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信