Randomized Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle Versus Two Types of Sharpened-Tip Three-Prong Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takuya Ishikawa, Hirotaka Suzuki, Yasuki Hori, Jun Yashika, Hiroki Suhara, Hajime Sumi, Masahiko Ando, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Kentaro Yamao, Yasuyuki Mizutani, Tadashi Iida, Kota Uetsuki, Takeshi Yamamura, Kazuhiro Furukawa, Masanao Nakamura, Hiromi Kataoka, Hiroki Kawashima
{"title":"Randomized Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle Versus Two Types of Sharpened-Tip Three-Prong Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Solid Pancreatic Lesions.","authors":"Takuya Ishikawa, Hirotaka Suzuki, Yasuki Hori, Jun Yashika, Hiroki Suhara, Hajime Sumi, Masahiko Ando, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Kentaro Yamao, Yasuyuki Mizutani, Tadashi Iida, Kota Uetsuki, Takeshi Yamamura, Kazuhiro Furukawa, Masanao Nakamura, Hiromi Kataoka, Hiroki Kawashima","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic diseases. Recently, two novel types of sharpened-tip, three-prong fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles, the Trident needle and the 3-point needle, have been developed to improve puncture performance. In this study, these novel needles were compared with the conventional Franseen needle in EUS-TA from solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with SPLs ≥ 10 mm were randomized for use of either conventional or novel FNB needles. The primary endpoint was the tissue-collection rate, with secondary endpoints including histological diagnosis, tissue volume, initial puncture success, puncture performance, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 185 patients were analyzed. The tissue-collection rates were 96.8% for the conventional needle and 92.6% for the novel FNB needles. The novel needles presented slightly lower tissue-collection rates, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, this difference was -4.2% (90% confidence interval: -9.53-1.12), which did not indicate noninferiority. However, the novel needles significantly outperformed the conventional needles in terms of initial puncture success and overall puncture performance. No significant differences were found in histological diagnosis, tissue volume, or adverse events between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conventional FNB needle demonstrated a higher tissue-collection rate but did not surpass the noninferiority margin that was set in this study, with no significant differences in the histological diagnostic performance or the tissue volume between the needles. The superior puncture performance of the novel needles suggests their particular benefit in challenging cases or for less experienced endoscopists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic diseases. Recently, two novel types of sharpened-tip, three-prong fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles, the Trident needle and the 3-point needle, have been developed to improve puncture performance. In this study, these novel needles were compared with the conventional Franseen needle in EUS-TA from solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs).

Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with SPLs ≥ 10 mm were randomized for use of either conventional or novel FNB needles. The primary endpoint was the tissue-collection rate, with secondary endpoints including histological diagnosis, tissue volume, initial puncture success, puncture performance, and adverse events.

Results: In total, 185 patients were analyzed. The tissue-collection rates were 96.8% for the conventional needle and 92.6% for the novel FNB needles. The novel needles presented slightly lower tissue-collection rates, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, this difference was -4.2% (90% confidence interval: -9.53-1.12), which did not indicate noninferiority. However, the novel needles significantly outperformed the conventional needles in terms of initial puncture success and overall puncture performance. No significant differences were found in histological diagnosis, tissue volume, or adverse events between the groups.

Conclusions: The conventional FNB needle demonstrated a higher tissue-collection rate but did not surpass the noninferiority margin that was set in this study, with no significant differences in the histological diagnostic performance or the tissue volume between the needles. The superior puncture performance of the novel needles suggests their particular benefit in challenging cases or for less experienced endoscopists.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信