Randomized Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle Versus Two Types of Sharpened-Tip Three-Prong Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
{"title":"Randomized Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle Versus Two Types of Sharpened-Tip Three-Prong Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Solid Pancreatic Lesions.","authors":"Takuya Ishikawa, Hirotaka Suzuki, Yasuki Hori, Jun Yashika, Hiroki Suhara, Hajime Sumi, Masahiko Ando, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, Kentaro Yamao, Yasuyuki Mizutani, Tadashi Iida, Kota Uetsuki, Takeshi Yamamura, Kazuhiro Furukawa, Masanao Nakamura, Hiromi Kataoka, Hiroki Kawashima","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic diseases. Recently, two novel types of sharpened-tip, three-prong fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles, the Trident needle and the 3-point needle, have been developed to improve puncture performance. In this study, these novel needles were compared with the conventional Franseen needle in EUS-TA from solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with SPLs ≥ 10 mm were randomized for use of either conventional or novel FNB needles. The primary endpoint was the tissue-collection rate, with secondary endpoints including histological diagnosis, tissue volume, initial puncture success, puncture performance, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 185 patients were analyzed. The tissue-collection rates were 96.8% for the conventional needle and 92.6% for the novel FNB needles. The novel needles presented slightly lower tissue-collection rates, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, this difference was -4.2% (90% confidence interval: -9.53-1.12), which did not indicate noninferiority. However, the novel needles significantly outperformed the conventional needles in terms of initial puncture success and overall puncture performance. No significant differences were found in histological diagnosis, tissue volume, or adverse events between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conventional FNB needle demonstrated a higher tissue-collection rate but did not surpass the noninferiority margin that was set in this study, with no significant differences in the histological diagnostic performance or the tissue volume between the needles. The superior puncture performance of the novel needles suggests their particular benefit in challenging cases or for less experienced endoscopists.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic diseases. Recently, two novel types of sharpened-tip, three-prong fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles, the Trident needle and the 3-point needle, have been developed to improve puncture performance. In this study, these novel needles were compared with the conventional Franseen needle in EUS-TA from solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs).
Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with SPLs ≥ 10 mm were randomized for use of either conventional or novel FNB needles. The primary endpoint was the tissue-collection rate, with secondary endpoints including histological diagnosis, tissue volume, initial puncture success, puncture performance, and adverse events.
Results: In total, 185 patients were analyzed. The tissue-collection rates were 96.8% for the conventional needle and 92.6% for the novel FNB needles. The novel needles presented slightly lower tissue-collection rates, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, this difference was -4.2% (90% confidence interval: -9.53-1.12), which did not indicate noninferiority. However, the novel needles significantly outperformed the conventional needles in terms of initial puncture success and overall puncture performance. No significant differences were found in histological diagnosis, tissue volume, or adverse events between the groups.
Conclusions: The conventional FNB needle demonstrated a higher tissue-collection rate but did not surpass the noninferiority margin that was set in this study, with no significant differences in the histological diagnostic performance or the tissue volume between the needles. The superior puncture performance of the novel needles suggests their particular benefit in challenging cases or for less experienced endoscopists.
期刊介绍:
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.