Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ramón López-Higes, Susana Rubio-Valdehita, David López-Sanz, Sara M Fernandes, Pedro F S Rodrigues, María Luisa Delgado-Losada
{"title":"Cognitive Performance Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline.","authors":"Ramón López-Higes, Susana Rubio-Valdehita, David López-Sanz, Sara M Fernandes, Pedro F S Rodrigues, María Luisa Delgado-Losada","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10020039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate if there are significant differences in cognition between a group of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and cognitively intact controls. <b>Methods:</b> An initial sample of 132 older people underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation (memory, executive functions, and language) and were classified according to diagnostic criteria. Two groups of 33 subjects each, controls and SCD, were formed using an a priori case-matching procedures in different variables: age, biological sex, years of education, cognitive reserve, and Mini-Mental State Exam. <b>Results:</b> The mean age and standard deviation in the control group were equal to 70.39 ± 4.31 years, while in the SCD group, they were 70.30 ± 4.33 years. The number of males (<i>n</i> = 9) and females (<i>n</i> = 24) was equal in both groups; the means of years of education were also quite similar. SCD participants have a significantly lower mood than the controls. Significant differences between groups were obtained in delayed recall, inhibitory control, and comprehension of sentences not fitted to canonical word order in Spanish. A logistic regression revealed that a lower score on the Stroop's interference condition is associated with a higher likelihood of having SCD. Finally, ROC analysis provided a model that performs better than random chance, and a cut-off score in Stroop's interference condition equal to 49 was suggested for clinically differentiating the two groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study highlights that, compared to a matched control group, participants with SCD showed subtle but significant neuropsychological differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11932273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10020039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate if there are significant differences in cognition between a group of older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and cognitively intact controls. Methods: An initial sample of 132 older people underwent an extensive neuropsychological evaluation (memory, executive functions, and language) and were classified according to diagnostic criteria. Two groups of 33 subjects each, controls and SCD, were formed using an a priori case-matching procedures in different variables: age, biological sex, years of education, cognitive reserve, and Mini-Mental State Exam. Results: The mean age and standard deviation in the control group were equal to 70.39 ± 4.31 years, while in the SCD group, they were 70.30 ± 4.33 years. The number of males (n = 9) and females (n = 24) was equal in both groups; the means of years of education were also quite similar. SCD participants have a significantly lower mood than the controls. Significant differences between groups were obtained in delayed recall, inhibitory control, and comprehension of sentences not fitted to canonical word order in Spanish. A logistic regression revealed that a lower score on the Stroop's interference condition is associated with a higher likelihood of having SCD. Finally, ROC analysis provided a model that performs better than random chance, and a cut-off score in Stroop's interference condition equal to 49 was suggested for clinically differentiating the two groups. Conclusions: This study highlights that, compared to a matched control group, participants with SCD showed subtle but significant neuropsychological differences.

老年人主观认知能力下降的认知表现。
目的:这项横断面研究的主要目的是调查一组主观认知衰退(SCD)的老年人和认知完整的对照组之间是否存在显著的认知差异。方法:对132名老年人进行了广泛的神经心理学评估(记忆、执行功能和语言),并根据诊断标准进行分类。在年龄、生理性别、受教育年限、认知储备和简易精神状态测试(Mini-Mental State Exam)等不同变量下,采用先验病例匹配程序,形成两组,每组33名受试者,对照组和SCD组。结果:对照组的平均年龄为70.39±4.31岁,SCD组的平均年龄为70.30±4.33岁。两组雄性(n = 9)和雌性(n = 24)数量相等;受教育年限也很相似。SCD参与者的情绪明显低于对照组。在西班牙语不符合标准语序的句子的延迟回忆、抑制控制和理解方面,两组之间存在显著差异。逻辑回归显示,Stroop干扰条件得分越低,患SCD的可能性越高。最后,ROC分析提供了一个优于随机机会的模型,建议Stroop干扰条件下的临界值为49分,用于临床区分两组。结论:本研究强调,与匹配的对照组相比,SCD参与者表现出微妙但显著的神经心理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信