Efficacy of combined non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity recovery post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1500020
Jiaoyun Wang, Huihuang Zhang, Jiani Ma, Lei Gu, Xiang Li
{"title":"Efficacy of combined non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity recovery post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Jiaoyun Wang, Huihuang Zhang, Jiani Ma, Lei Gu, Xiang Li","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2025.1500020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower extremity dysfunction post-stroke significantly impedes patient independence and quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) have individually shown promising outcomes in gait recovery. However, the synergistic efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with robot-assisted gait training remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the combined therapy's effectiveness on gait improvement and related motor functions in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to September 2024. The primary outcome was assessed using the 6-min walk test (6MWT), with secondary outcomes examining assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC); the Motion Index (MI) to analyze exercise intensity; the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to assess spasticity; and spatiotemporal gait parameters (SPG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials involving 191 stroke patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that combined non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training significantly improved the 6-min walk test scores (mean difference [MD] = 21.81, 95% CI = 0.03-43.59), though effects on strength, activity participation, spasticity, and coordination were non-significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with robot-assisted gait training shows potential in enhancing gait function but provides limited additional benefits for other motor functions. This combined approach may serve as an effective rehabilitation strategy for post-stroke gait recovery, warranting further large-scale studies to refine intervention protocols.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021283890.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1500020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1500020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower extremity dysfunction post-stroke significantly impedes patient independence and quality of life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) have individually shown promising outcomes in gait recovery. However, the synergistic efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with robot-assisted gait training remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the combined therapy's effectiveness on gait improvement and related motor functions in stroke patients.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to September 2024. The primary outcome was assessed using the 6-min walk test (6MWT), with secondary outcomes examining assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC); the Motion Index (MI) to analyze exercise intensity; the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) to assess spasticity; and spatiotemporal gait parameters (SPG).

Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 191 stroke patients were included. Meta-analysis revealed that combined non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training significantly improved the 6-min walk test scores (mean difference [MD] = 21.81, 95% CI = 0.03-43.59), though effects on strength, activity participation, spasticity, and coordination were non-significant.

Conclusion: Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with robot-assisted gait training shows potential in enhancing gait function but provides limited additional benefits for other motor functions. This combined approach may serve as an effective rehabilitation strategy for post-stroke gait recovery, warranting further large-scale studies to refine intervention protocols.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021283890.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信