Integration of AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment to reduce benign biopsies on breast ultrasound.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yan Ju, Ge Zhang, Yi Wan, Gang Wang, Rui Shu, Panpan Zhang, Hongping Song
{"title":"Integration of AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment to reduce benign biopsies on breast ultrasound.","authors":"Yan Ju, Ge Zhang, Yi Wan, Gang Wang, Rui Shu, Panpan Zhang, Hongping Song","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11467-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and test AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies to improve the specificity of screening breast ultrasound (US).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included consecutive asymptomatic women with BI-RADS 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, or 5 masses on screening breast US exams acquired from two hospitals between December 2019 and December 2020 (development cohort) and June 2020 and December 2020 (external validation cohort). If more than one lesion was present, the most suspicious lesion was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to develop the AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies in which BI-RADS 4a masses were downgraded to BI-RADS 3 if the AI classifications were \"both planes benign\" in all women or \"benign and malignant\" in the women ≤ 45 years of age. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for both cohorts and compared to initial assessments by radiologists using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for noninferiority of sensitivity (relative noninferiority margin, 5%) and the McNemar test for specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The development and external validation cohorts consisted of 393 women (median age, 45 years [IQR, 40-50 years]) with 101 malignancies and 166 women (median age, 47 years [IQR, 42-51 years]) with 31 malignancies, respectively. The developed strategy improved specificity from 53.3% (72/135; 95% CI: 45.0, 62.1) to 80.7% (109/135; [95% CI: 74.2, 87.5]; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (both 100% [31/31; 95% CI: 98.9, 100]), and would have avoided 61.7% (37/60 [95% CI: 48.2, 73.7]) of benign biopsies of BI-RADS 4a masses in the external validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A strategy integrating AI classification in two orthogonal planes, age, and BI-RADS classification improved the specificity of screening breast US while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How can integrating AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment effectively reduce benign biopsies in screening breast ultrasound? Findings A strategy integrating AI classifications, age, and BI-RADS using multivariable logistic regression improved specificity while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity in breast ultrasound screening. Clinical relevance The integration of AI classification in two orthogonal planes, along with patient age and BI-RADS classification, shows potential for reducing benign breast biopsies without compromising sensitivity, leading to more efficient clinical decision-making, reduced patient anxiety, and decreased healthcare resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11467-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and test AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies to improve the specificity of screening breast ultrasound (US).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included consecutive asymptomatic women with BI-RADS 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, or 5 masses on screening breast US exams acquired from two hospitals between December 2019 and December 2020 (development cohort) and June 2020 and December 2020 (external validation cohort). If more than one lesion was present, the most suspicious lesion was analyzed. Logistic regression was used to develop the AI-integrated biopsy avoidance strategies in which BI-RADS 4a masses were downgraded to BI-RADS 3 if the AI classifications were "both planes benign" in all women or "benign and malignant" in the women ≤ 45 years of age. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for both cohorts and compared to initial assessments by radiologists using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for noninferiority of sensitivity (relative noninferiority margin, 5%) and the McNemar test for specificity.

Results: The development and external validation cohorts consisted of 393 women (median age, 45 years [IQR, 40-50 years]) with 101 malignancies and 166 women (median age, 47 years [IQR, 42-51 years]) with 31 malignancies, respectively. The developed strategy improved specificity from 53.3% (72/135; 95% CI: 45.0, 62.1) to 80.7% (109/135; [95% CI: 74.2, 87.5]; p < 0.001) while maintaining sensitivity (both 100% [31/31; 95% CI: 98.9, 100]), and would have avoided 61.7% (37/60 [95% CI: 48.2, 73.7]) of benign biopsies of BI-RADS 4a masses in the external validation cohort.

Conclusion: A strategy integrating AI classification in two orthogonal planes, age, and BI-RADS classification improved the specificity of screening breast US while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity.

Key points: Question How can integrating AI lesion classification, age, and BI-RADS assessment effectively reduce benign biopsies in screening breast ultrasound? Findings A strategy integrating AI classifications, age, and BI-RADS using multivariable logistic regression improved specificity while maintaining non-inferior sensitivity in breast ultrasound screening. Clinical relevance The integration of AI classification in two orthogonal planes, along with patient age and BI-RADS classification, shows potential for reducing benign breast biopsies without compromising sensitivity, leading to more efficient clinical decision-making, reduced patient anxiety, and decreased healthcare resource utilization.

结合AI病变分类、年龄和BI-RADS评估,减少乳腺超声良性活检。
目的:开发和测试人工智能集成活检避免策略,以提高乳腺超声筛查(US)的特异性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2019年12月至2020年12月(发展队列)和2020年6月至2020年12月(外部验证队列)在两家医院进行乳腺US筛查,BI-RADS为3、4a、4b、4c或5块肿块的连续无症状女性。如果出现一个以上的病变,则分析最可疑的病变。如果AI分类在所有女性中为“两平面良性”,或在≤45岁的女性中为“良恶性”,则BI-RADS 4a肿块降级为BI-RADS 3,采用Logistic回归制定AI整合活检避免策略。计算两个队列的诊断性能指标,并与放射科医生使用Wilcoxon秩和检验的敏感性非劣效性(相对非劣效裕度,5%)和McNemar试验的特异性的初始评估进行比较。结果:开发和外部验证队列分别由393名女性(中位年龄45岁[IQR, 40-50岁])和166名女性(中位年龄47岁[IQR, 42-51岁])组成,分别有101例恶性肿瘤和31例恶性肿瘤。开发的策略将特异性从53.3% (72/135;95% CI: 45.0, 62.1)至80.7% (109/135;[95% ci: 74.2, 87.5];结论:将AI分型与年龄、BI-RADS分型相结合的策略提高了筛查乳腺US的特异性,同时保持了非劣势的敏感性。在乳腺超声筛查中,如何结合AI病变分类、年龄、BI-RADS评估有效减少良性活检?使用多变量逻辑回归将AI分类、年龄和BI-RADS整合在一起的策略提高了乳腺超声筛查的特异性,同时保持了非劣势敏感性。人工智能分类在两个正交平面上的整合,以及患者年龄和BI-RADS分类,显示出在不影响敏感性的情况下减少良性乳腺活检的潜力,从而提高临床决策效率,减少患者焦虑,降低医疗资源利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信