Automated abdominal CT imaging biomarkers and clinical frailty measures associated with postoperative deceased-donor liver transplant outcomes.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniel Liu, David Ji, John W Garrett, Ryan Zea, Adam Kuchnia, Ronald M Summers, Joshua D Mezrich, Perry J Pickhardt
{"title":"Automated abdominal CT imaging biomarkers and clinical frailty measures associated with postoperative deceased-donor liver transplant outcomes.","authors":"Daniel Liu, David Ji, John W Garrett, Ryan Zea, Adam Kuchnia, Ronald M Summers, Joshua D Mezrich, Perry J Pickhardt","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11523-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the potential of fully automated CT-based body composition metrics and clinical frailty data in predicting liver transplant recipient postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AI-enabled body composition tools were applied to pre-transplant abdominal CT scans in a retrospective cohort of first-time deceased-donor liver transplant recipients. Clinical frailty data (Fried frailty score) was obtained from an established transplant database. Age- and sex-corrected hazard ratios (HRs) were analyzed according to highest-risk quartiles compared with the other three quartiles combined. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) analysis in univariate and multivariate scenarios was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>598 liver transplant recipients (median age, 56 years [IQR, 49-61]; 383 men/215 women) were included from 2005 to 2021. Mean clinical follow-up interval after transplant was 8.6 ± 4.5 years, with 224 deaths (mean interval, 5.3 ± 3.9 years post-transplant) and 246 graft failures (mean interval, 4.7 ± 4.0 years post-transplant) observed. Univariate HRs for post-transplant survival included 1.53 (95% CI, 1.14-2.06) for muscle attenuation, 1.66 (95% Cl, 1.24-2.22) for aortic Agatston score, 1.35 (1.02-1.80) for SAT area, and 1.82 (1.35-2.46) for liver volume. For those meeting the frailty criteria, HR was 2.14 (1.08-4.22). Multivariate 10-year AUC for predicting mortality was 0.675 using liver volume, aortic Agatston score, and muscle attenuation. 10-year univariate AUC for clinical frailty assessment was 0.601 but increased to 0.878 when combined with CT measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated CT measurements of muscle density (myosteatosis), aortic calcification, subcutaneous fat, and liver volume are predictive of mortality in liver transplant recipients. Frailty was likewise predictive. Combining CT and clinical frailty assessment was complementary.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question What is the prognostic value of pre-transplant CT-based body composition measures for deceased-donor liver transplant outcomes, and how do they correlate with frailty assessment? Findings Increased post-transplant mortality was associated with pre-transplant increased liver volume, increased abdominal aortic Agatston score, decreased skeletal muscle attenuation, and decreased subcutaneous adipose tissue area. Clinical relevance Pre-transplant AI-enabled body composition measures have predictive value for post-transplant survival, offering a novel and objective diagnostic tool to identify high-risk transplant recipients that are complementary to clinical assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11523-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the potential of fully automated CT-based body composition metrics and clinical frailty data in predicting liver transplant recipient postoperative outcomes.

Methods: AI-enabled body composition tools were applied to pre-transplant abdominal CT scans in a retrospective cohort of first-time deceased-donor liver transplant recipients. Clinical frailty data (Fried frailty score) was obtained from an established transplant database. Age- and sex-corrected hazard ratios (HRs) were analyzed according to highest-risk quartiles compared with the other three quartiles combined. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) analysis in univariate and multivariate scenarios was also performed.

Results: 598 liver transplant recipients (median age, 56 years [IQR, 49-61]; 383 men/215 women) were included from 2005 to 2021. Mean clinical follow-up interval after transplant was 8.6 ± 4.5 years, with 224 deaths (mean interval, 5.3 ± 3.9 years post-transplant) and 246 graft failures (mean interval, 4.7 ± 4.0 years post-transplant) observed. Univariate HRs for post-transplant survival included 1.53 (95% CI, 1.14-2.06) for muscle attenuation, 1.66 (95% Cl, 1.24-2.22) for aortic Agatston score, 1.35 (1.02-1.80) for SAT area, and 1.82 (1.35-2.46) for liver volume. For those meeting the frailty criteria, HR was 2.14 (1.08-4.22). Multivariate 10-year AUC for predicting mortality was 0.675 using liver volume, aortic Agatston score, and muscle attenuation. 10-year univariate AUC for clinical frailty assessment was 0.601 but increased to 0.878 when combined with CT measures.

Conclusion: Automated CT measurements of muscle density (myosteatosis), aortic calcification, subcutaneous fat, and liver volume are predictive of mortality in liver transplant recipients. Frailty was likewise predictive. Combining CT and clinical frailty assessment was complementary.

Key points: Question What is the prognostic value of pre-transplant CT-based body composition measures for deceased-donor liver transplant outcomes, and how do they correlate with frailty assessment? Findings Increased post-transplant mortality was associated with pre-transplant increased liver volume, increased abdominal aortic Agatston score, decreased skeletal muscle attenuation, and decreased subcutaneous adipose tissue area. Clinical relevance Pre-transplant AI-enabled body composition measures have predictive value for post-transplant survival, offering a novel and objective diagnostic tool to identify high-risk transplant recipients that are complementary to clinical assessments.

自动腹部CT成像生物标志物和临床虚弱指标与术后死亡供体肝移植结果相关。
目的:量化全自动ct体成分指标和临床虚弱数据在预测肝移植术后预后方面的潜力。方法:在首次死亡的供肝移植受者的回顾性队列中,应用ai支持的身体成分工具进行移植前腹部CT扫描。临床衰弱数据(Fried衰弱评分)从已建立的移植数据库中获得。根据最高风险四分位数与其他三个四分位数的总和比较,分析年龄和性别校正后的危险比(hr)。在单因素和多因素情况下进行受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)分析。结果:598例肝移植受者(中位年龄56岁[IQR, 49-61];2005年至2021年期间包括383名男性/215名女性。移植后平均临床随访时间为8.6±4.5年,其中死亡224例(平均随访时间为5.3±3.9年),移植失败246例(平均随访时间为4.7±4.0年)。移植后生存的单因素hr包括肌肉衰减1.53 (95% CI, 1.14-2.06),主动脉Agatston评分1.66 (95% Cl, 1.24-2.22), SAT面积1.35(1.02-1.80),肝体积1.82(1.35-2.46)。对于那些符合衰弱标准的人,HR为2.14(1.08-4.22)。使用肝体积、主动脉Agatston评分和肌肉衰减预测死亡率的多变量10年AUC为0.675。临床虚弱评估的10年单变量AUC为0.601,但与CT测量相结合时增加到0.878。结论:自动CT测量肌肉密度(肌骨化症)、主动脉钙化、皮下脂肪和肝脏体积可预测肝移植受者的死亡率。脆弱也同样具有预测性。结合CT与临床虚弱评估相辅相成。移植前基于ct的体成分测量对死亡供体肝移植结果的预后价值是什么?它们如何与衰弱评估相关联?结果:移植后死亡率增加与移植前肝体积增加、腹主动脉Agatston评分增加、骨骼肌衰减减少和皮下脂肪组织面积减少有关。移植前人工智能支持的身体成分测量对移植后生存具有预测价值,为识别高风险移植受体提供了一种新的客观诊断工具,是临床评估的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信