{"title":"Assessment of arterial stiffness in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Dimitrios Kazantzis , Konstantinos Papathanasiou , Genovefa Machairoudia , Panagiotis Theodossiadis , Irini Chatziralli","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). A number of studies have investigated if patients with diabetic retinopathy present altered arterial stiffness compared to diabetic individuals without retinopathy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare arterial stiffness parameters in participants with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to participants with diabetes without retinopathy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Medline and Scopus were searched for published articles comparing indices of arterial stiffness in participants with DR and in diabetic participants without retinopathy. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the comparisons. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO with registration ID: CRD42023482577.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The <em>meta</em>-analysis analyzed 3 arterial stiffness parameters brachial ankle PWV, carotid-femoral PWV and augmentation index (AI). 8 studies were included in the analysis of brachial ankle PWV, 4 in the analysis of carotid-femoral PWV and 4 in the analysis of the augmentation index. Brachial ankle PWV, carotid-femoral PWV and augmentation index were found to be increased in participants with DR compared to diabetic participants without DR (SMD = 0.59, 95 %CI = 0.40–0.79, P < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 89 %, SMD = 0.86, 95 %CI = 0.55–1.18P < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 91 % and SMD = 0.23, 95 %CI = 0.13–0.32, P < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Diabetic participants with DR exhibit increased arterial stiffness compared to diabetic participants without DR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 112123"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725001378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). A number of studies have investigated if patients with diabetic retinopathy present altered arterial stiffness compared to diabetic individuals without retinopathy.
Objectives
To compare arterial stiffness parameters in participants with diabetic retinopathy (DR) compared to participants with diabetes without retinopathy.
Methods
Medline and Scopus were searched for published articles comparing indices of arterial stiffness in participants with DR and in diabetic participants without retinopathy. Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for the comparisons. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO with registration ID: CRD42023482577.
Results:
The meta-analysis analyzed 3 arterial stiffness parameters brachial ankle PWV, carotid-femoral PWV and augmentation index (AI). 8 studies were included in the analysis of brachial ankle PWV, 4 in the analysis of carotid-femoral PWV and 4 in the analysis of the augmentation index. Brachial ankle PWV, carotid-femoral PWV and augmentation index were found to be increased in participants with DR compared to diabetic participants without DR (SMD = 0.59, 95 %CI = 0.40–0.79, P < 0.00001, I2 = 89 %, SMD = 0.86, 95 %CI = 0.55–1.18P < 0.00001, I2 = 91 % and SMD = 0.23, 95 %CI = 0.13–0.32, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0 %, respectively).
Conclusion
Diabetic participants with DR exhibit increased arterial stiffness compared to diabetic participants without DR.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.