Be cautious to adopt a second CAR T-cell infusion after failure of CD19/CD22 cocktail CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-NHL.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Gaoxiang Wang, Meijuan Huang, Lijun Jiang, Xiaoying Zhang, Zhenhao Wang, Qiuxia Yu, Dengju Li, Yang Yang, Xin Yang, Yang Cao
{"title":"Be cautious to adopt a second CAR T-cell infusion after failure of CD19/CD22 cocktail CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-NHL.","authors":"Gaoxiang Wang, Meijuan Huang, Lijun Jiang, Xiaoying Zhang, Zhenhao Wang, Qiuxia Yu, Dengju Li, Yang Yang, Xin Yang, Yang Cao","doi":"10.1007/s00262-025-04001-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion (CTI) therapy has emerged as a breakthrough therapy in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R B-NHL), but a substantial number of patients still suffer treatment failure. Data on disease history, subsequent salvage therapies, and outcomes of patients who face treatment failure after the first CTI (CTI1) have not been reported in detail or systematically studied. Here, a retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 61 R/R B-NHL patients in whom salvage therapies were adopted after CTI1 treatment failure, with their clinical characteristics, subsequent management and outcomes described in detail. The results suggested that second-time CTI (CTI2) used as salvage therapy after failure of CTI1 could achieve a better transient overall response rate (ORR) than other salvage treatments (non-CTI2) in only a minority of patients (8/27 vs. 2/34, P=0.014). Nevertheless, the non-CTI2 group showed better event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.048) than the CTI2 group, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months vs. 4.7 months. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only the status of the tumor at disease onset was an independent risk factor for survival; salvage therapy after CTI1 treatment failure was not. The adverse effects of CTI2 treatment were generally similar to those of non-CTI2 treatment, but the infection-related mortality was considerably higher. In conclusion, the prognosis of patients who fail CTI1 therapy is very poor regardless of the subsequent salvage therapies, and clinicians should be cautious about adopting CTI2 treatment after failure of treatment with the CD19/22 cocktail CTI1 in R/R B-NHL. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted, and new strategies are urgently needed to prevent treatment failure and improve the survival of B-cell lymphoma patients in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 5","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-025-04001-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell infusion (CTI) therapy has emerged as a breakthrough therapy in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R B-NHL), but a substantial number of patients still suffer treatment failure. Data on disease history, subsequent salvage therapies, and outcomes of patients who face treatment failure after the first CTI (CTI1) have not been reported in detail or systematically studied. Here, a retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 61 R/R B-NHL patients in whom salvage therapies were adopted after CTI1 treatment failure, with their clinical characteristics, subsequent management and outcomes described in detail. The results suggested that second-time CTI (CTI2) used as salvage therapy after failure of CTI1 could achieve a better transient overall response rate (ORR) than other salvage treatments (non-CTI2) in only a minority of patients (8/27 vs. 2/34, P=0.014). Nevertheless, the non-CTI2 group showed better event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.007) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.048) than the CTI2 group, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months vs. 4.7 months. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses showed that only the status of the tumor at disease onset was an independent risk factor for survival; salvage therapy after CTI1 treatment failure was not. The adverse effects of CTI2 treatment were generally similar to those of non-CTI2 treatment, but the infection-related mortality was considerably higher. In conclusion, the prognosis of patients who fail CTI1 therapy is very poor regardless of the subsequent salvage therapies, and clinicians should be cautious about adopting CTI2 treatment after failure of treatment with the CD19/22 cocktail CTI1 in R/R B-NHL. Large-scale prospective studies are warranted, and new strategies are urgently needed to prevent treatment failure and improve the survival of B-cell lymphoma patients in future.

对于复发/难治性B-NHL,在CD19/CD22混合CAR - t细胞治疗失败后,要谨慎采用第二次CAR - t细胞输注。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞输注(CTI)治疗已成为复发/难治性b细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(R/R B-NHL)的突破性治疗方法,但仍有相当数量的患者遭受治疗失败。关于疾病史、随后的挽救性治疗以及首次CTI (CTI1)后面临治疗失败的患者的结果的数据尚未有详细或系统的研究报道。本文回顾性分析61例在CTI1治疗失败后采用挽救性治疗的R/R B-NHL患者,详细描述其临床特征、后续处理和结局。结果表明,在CTI1失败后,第二次CTI (CTI2)作为挽救治疗,只有少数患者的短暂总有效率(ORR)高于其他挽救治疗(非CTI2) (8/27 vs. 2/34, P=0.014)。然而,非CTI2组的无事件生存期(EFS) (P = 0.007)和总生存期(OS) (P = 0.048)优于CTI2组,中位随访时间为6.7个月对4.7个月。此外,单因素和多因素分析显示,只有肿瘤在发病时的状态是生存的独立危险因素;未见CTI1治疗失败后的抢救治疗。CTI2治疗的不良反应与非CTI2治疗大体相似,但感染相关死亡率明显较高。综上所述,CTI1治疗失败的患者预后非常差,无论后续的挽救性治疗如何,临床医生在使用CD19/22鸡尾酒CTI1治疗R/R B-NHL失败后,应谨慎采用CTI2治疗。大规模的前瞻性研究是必要的,未来迫切需要新的策略来预防治疗失败和提高b细胞淋巴瘤患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
207
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions. The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信