The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0942
Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai
{"title":"The role of intraductal ultrasound in endoscopic biliary brushing for sampling in patients with malignant biliary strictures: a bicentric retrospective study.","authors":"Jianxiang Wang, Zhuqiong Lu, Guangwen Chen, Zhenyang Shen, Junjun Wang, Jiangfeng Hu, Xinjian Wan, Hongcheng Sun, Haiming Zheng, Xiaobo Cai","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"208-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic biliary brushing is the first line modality for sampling in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture (BS); however, its sensitivity is limited. Endoscopic intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) is also a useful approach for the diagnosis of biliary malignancies. However, whether IDUS can guide the sampling by biliary brushing has not been reported.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for BS in 2 tertiary care hospitals and assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of IDUS and brush cytology.

Results: The study involved 530 patients with BS, including 333 in the IDUS group and 197 in the non-IDUS group. Both groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics. The diagnostic ability of IDUS imaging was as follows: sensitivity 70.7%, specificity 82.4%, PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%, and accuracy 76.3%. Brush cytology alone demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 45.2%, with specificity 98.2%, PPV 97.2%, NPV 56.0%, and accuracy 67.2%. The sensitivity was similar in patients with or without IDUS, whereas it was significantly higher in patients with biliary mucosal invasion indicated by IDUS (55.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.003).

Conclusion: Although IDUS cannot improve the detection rate of biliary brushing for malignancy, it helps identify patients with malignant BS to be sampled more easily by brushing.

导管内超声在恶性胆道狭窄患者内镜下胆道刷洗取样中的作用:一项双中心回顾性研究。
背景:内镜下胆道刷壁是不确定胆道狭窄(BS)患者的一线取样方式;然而,它的敏感性是有限的。内镜下导管内超声(IDUS)也是诊断胆道恶性肿瘤的有效方法。但IDUS能否指导胆道刷胆取样尚无报道。方法:回顾性分析2家三级医院行内窥镜逆行胆管造影诊断BS的患者,评估IDUS和刷细胞学检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性。结果:本研究纳入530例BS患者,其中IDUS组333例,非IDUS组197例。两组表现出相似的基线特征。IDUS影像学诊断能力:敏感性70.7%,特异性82.4%,PPV 81.5%, NPV 72.0%,准确率76.3%。单独刷细胞学检查的总体敏感性为45.2%,特异性为98.2%,PPV为97.2%,NPV为56.0%,准确性为67.2%。有或无IDUS患者的敏感性相似,而IDUS指示胆道粘膜侵犯患者的敏感性明显更高(55.1%比30.3%,P=0.003)。结论:IDUS虽不能提高胆道刷检对恶性BS的检出率,但有助于通过刷检更容易识别恶性BS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信