Construct validity and reliability of the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability: neuropsychological test battery for assessing cognitive functioning in people with intellectual disability.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.847
Tanja Sappok, Miriam Flachsmeyer, Peggy Rösner, Björn Kruse, Sandra-Verena Müller, Daria Tarasova
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability: neuropsychological test battery for assessing cognitive functioning in people with intellectual disability.","authors":"Tanja Sappok, Miriam Flachsmeyer, Peggy Rösner, Björn Kruse, Sandra-Verena Müller, Daria Tarasova","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to additional disorders such as dementia. Psychometrically sound and specific instruments are needed for assessment of cognitive functioning in cases of suspected dementia.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the construct and item validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of a new neuropsychological test battery, the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability (DTIM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The DTIM was applied to 107 individuals with intellectual disability with (<i>n</i> = 16) and without (<i>n</i> = 91) dementia. The psychometric properties of the DTIM were assessed in a prospective study. The assessors were blinded to the diagnostic assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis at the scale level showed that a one-factor model fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation < 0.06, standardised root mean square residual < 0.08, comparative fit index > 0.9). At the domain level, one-factor models showed reasonable-to-good fit index for five of seven domains. Internal consistency indicated excellent reliability of the overall scale (Cronbach's α: 0.94 for dementia and 0.95 for controls). Item analysis revealed a wide range of difficulties (0.19-0.75 for dementia, 0.31-0.87 for controls), with minimal floor and ceiling effects. Eleven items (26%) had discrimination value ≤ 0.50. Test-retest reliability (<i>n</i> = 82) was high, with intraclass correlations of 0.95 (total score) and 0.69-0.96 (domains).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DTIM fits a one-factor model and demonstrates internal and test-retest reliability; thus, it is suitable for use in cases of suspected dementia in people with various intellectual disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to additional disorders such as dementia. Psychometrically sound and specific instruments are needed for assessment of cognitive functioning in cases of suspected dementia.

Aims: To evaluate the construct and item validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of a new neuropsychological test battery, the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability (DTIM).

Method: The DTIM was applied to 107 individuals with intellectual disability with (n = 16) and without (n = 91) dementia. The psychometric properties of the DTIM were assessed in a prospective study. The assessors were blinded to the diagnostic assignment.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis at the scale level showed that a one-factor model fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation < 0.06, standardised root mean square residual < 0.08, comparative fit index > 0.9). At the domain level, one-factor models showed reasonable-to-good fit index for five of seven domains. Internal consistency indicated excellent reliability of the overall scale (Cronbach's α: 0.94 for dementia and 0.95 for controls). Item analysis revealed a wide range of difficulties (0.19-0.75 for dementia, 0.31-0.87 for controls), with minimal floor and ceiling effects. Eleven items (26%) had discrimination value ≤ 0.50. Test-retest reliability (n = 82) was high, with intraclass correlations of 0.95 (total score) and 0.69-0.96 (domains).

Conclusions: The DTIM fits a one-factor model and demonstrates internal and test-retest reliability; thus, it is suitable for use in cases of suspected dementia in people with various intellectual disabilities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信