Construct validity and reliability of the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability: neuropsychological test battery for assessing cognitive functioning in people with intellectual disability.
{"title":"Construct validity and reliability of the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability: neuropsychological test battery for assessing cognitive functioning in people with intellectual disability.","authors":"Tanja Sappok, Miriam Flachsmeyer, Peggy Rösner, Björn Kruse, Sandra-Verena Müller, Daria Tarasova","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to additional disorders such as dementia. Psychometrically sound and specific instruments are needed for assessment of cognitive functioning in cases of suspected dementia.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the construct and item validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of a new neuropsychological test battery, the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability (DTIM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The DTIM was applied to 107 individuals with intellectual disability with (<i>n</i> = 16) and without (<i>n</i> = 91) dementia. The psychometric properties of the DTIM were assessed in a prospective study. The assessors were blinded to the diagnostic assignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis at the scale level showed that a one-factor model fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation < 0.06, standardised root mean square residual < 0.08, comparative fit index > 0.9). At the domain level, one-factor models showed reasonable-to-good fit index for five of seven domains. Internal consistency indicated excellent reliability of the overall scale (Cronbach's α: 0.94 for dementia and 0.95 for controls). Item analysis revealed a wide range of difficulties (0.19-0.75 for dementia, 0.31-0.87 for controls), with minimal floor and ceiling effects. Eleven items (26%) had discrimination value ≤ 0.50. Test-retest reliability (<i>n</i> = 82) was high, with intraclass correlations of 0.95 (total score) and 0.69-0.96 (domains).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DTIM fits a one-factor model and demonstrates internal and test-retest reliability; thus, it is suitable for use in cases of suspected dementia in people with various intellectual disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.847","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: People with an intellectual disability are vulnerable to additional disorders such as dementia. Psychometrically sound and specific instruments are needed for assessment of cognitive functioning in cases of suspected dementia.
Aims: To evaluate the construct and item validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of a new neuropsychological test battery, the Dementia Test for People with Intellectual Disability (DTIM).
Method: The DTIM was applied to 107 individuals with intellectual disability with (n = 16) and without (n = 91) dementia. The psychometric properties of the DTIM were assessed in a prospective study. The assessors were blinded to the diagnostic assignment.
Results: Confirmatory factor analysis at the scale level showed that a one-factor model fitted the data well (root mean square error of approximation < 0.06, standardised root mean square residual < 0.08, comparative fit index > 0.9). At the domain level, one-factor models showed reasonable-to-good fit index for five of seven domains. Internal consistency indicated excellent reliability of the overall scale (Cronbach's α: 0.94 for dementia and 0.95 for controls). Item analysis revealed a wide range of difficulties (0.19-0.75 for dementia, 0.31-0.87 for controls), with minimal floor and ceiling effects. Eleven items (26%) had discrimination value ≤ 0.50. Test-retest reliability (n = 82) was high, with intraclass correlations of 0.95 (total score) and 0.69-0.96 (domains).
Conclusions: The DTIM fits a one-factor model and demonstrates internal and test-retest reliability; thus, it is suitable for use in cases of suspected dementia in people with various intellectual disabilities.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.