Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.20524/aog.2025.0954
Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana
{"title":"Endoscopic removal of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: a case series and literature review.","authors":"Sachin Hosahally Jayanna, Nikhil Bush, Ravi Sharma, Rajesh Gupta, Surinder Singh Rana","doi":"10.20524/aog.2025.0954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents <i>in situ</i>. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"38 2","pages":"230-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2025.0954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal migration of pancreatic stents is an uncommon but significant problem that poses risks of pain and pancreatitis. It is often a challenging situation for endoscopists, necessitating surgical retrieval in 10% of cases.

Method: A 10-year retrospective review was performed of stent removal procedures performed at a tertiary care center in northern India between January 2010 and December 2019.

Results: Sixteen patients (mean age 39.52 years, 13 [81.25%] males) with proximally migrated pancreatic stents (PMPSs) were studied. Thirteen (81.25%) patients had a dilated pancreatic duct (PD) and 3 (18.75%) had a non-dilated PD. In the majority of patients, the PMPSs were located at the genu (50%), while 62% were 10 cm in length. Three (18.75%) patients had fragmented stents, whereas the remaining 13 (81.25%) had intact stents in situ. Complete retrieval of the PPMS and stent fragments was possible in 12 (75%) patients, with grasping forceps being used in the majority (50%). In patients with fragmented stents and difficult locations (n=3), pancreatoscopy-assisted techniques resulted in the retrieval of the stent or fragments. PMPSs could not be retrieved in 3 patients: all these failures were during the study period when a SpyGlass pancreatoscope was not available in our unit. Two patients (12.5%) reported post-procedural pain that responded to intravenous analgesics.

Conclusions: Endoscopic retrieval of proximally migrated stents, using a combination of techniques and accessories, is safe and effective. Pancreatoscopy increases the success rates. Surgery is rarely required for stent removal.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜下近端移位胰管支架的移除:一个病例系列和文献回顾。
背景:胰腺支架近端移位是一个不常见但重要的问题,它会带来疼痛和胰腺炎的风险。对于内窥镜医生来说,这通常是一个具有挑战性的情况,10%的病例需要手术切除。方法:对2010年1月至2019年12月在印度北部一家三级医疗中心进行的支架移除手术进行了10年的回顾性研究。结果:本组共16例(平均年龄39.52岁,男性13例[81.25%])行近端移位胰内支架(pmps)。13例(81.25%)患者胰管扩张,3例(18.75%)患者胰管未扩张。在大多数患者中,pmps位于膝(50%),62%长度为10 cm。3例(18.75%)患者支架碎片化,其余13例(81.25%)患者支架原位完整。12例(75%)患者可以完全取出PPMS和支架碎片,大多数(50%)患者使用抓钳。在支架碎片化和定位困难的患者中(n=3),胰镜辅助技术可将支架或碎片取出。3例患者pmps无法检索:所有这些失败都发生在我们单位没有SpyGlass胰镜的研究期间。2例患者(12.5%)报告术后疼痛对静脉镇痛药有反应。结论:内镜下取下近端移位支架,结合技术和附件是安全有效的。胰镜检查提高了成功率。支架移除很少需要手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信