Sun Safety Policy Implementation in Australian Primary Schools.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Australasian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1111/ajd.14461
Katherine Lissner, Annabel Stevenson
{"title":"Sun Safety Policy Implementation in Australian Primary Schools.","authors":"Katherine Lissner, Annabel Stevenson","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Current SunSmart policy in Australia is implemented and reviewed by the Cancer Council using self-reported survey data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers conducted an external assessment of the implementation of sun safety policies in Australian primary schools by conducting a national survey with questions constructed based on the SunSmart policy. Multivariable binary logistic regressions were performed to understand the relationships between the various sun-safety activities and school characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We hypothesised that schools with a higher ultraviolet (UV) exposure rating would perform better due to higher perceived risk. This was true for year-round uniform policy and presence of outdoor sails. Use of sunscreen in Australian schools remains inadequate. Students at more advantaged schools were 2.1 times more likely to use sunscreen, potentially demonstrating a relationship between financial access or awareness, providing an avenue for future funding decisions. Use of sun-protective eyewear remains insufficient, with only 11.1% of schools encouraging use, but Catholic school students are twice as likely to wear sunglasses. Schools in extreme UV areas had the lowest odds ratio of sunglasses use, highlighting a clear target for future intervention. Other important differences in school type were found, including that independent school students have a 58% lower likelihood of wearing SunSmart adherent uniforms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found statistically significant inequalities in sun safety behaviours in different school types in Australia, providing utility for future funding and policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"268-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Current SunSmart policy in Australia is implemented and reviewed by the Cancer Council using self-reported survey data.

Methods: Researchers conducted an external assessment of the implementation of sun safety policies in Australian primary schools by conducting a national survey with questions constructed based on the SunSmart policy. Multivariable binary logistic regressions were performed to understand the relationships between the various sun-safety activities and school characteristics.

Results: We hypothesised that schools with a higher ultraviolet (UV) exposure rating would perform better due to higher perceived risk. This was true for year-round uniform policy and presence of outdoor sails. Use of sunscreen in Australian schools remains inadequate. Students at more advantaged schools were 2.1 times more likely to use sunscreen, potentially demonstrating a relationship between financial access or awareness, providing an avenue for future funding decisions. Use of sun-protective eyewear remains insufficient, with only 11.1% of schools encouraging use, but Catholic school students are twice as likely to wear sunglasses. Schools in extreme UV areas had the lowest odds ratio of sunglasses use, highlighting a clear target for future intervention. Other important differences in school type were found, including that independent school students have a 58% lower likelihood of wearing SunSmart adherent uniforms.

Conclusions: We found statistically significant inequalities in sun safety behaviours in different school types in Australia, providing utility for future funding and policy decisions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

澳大利亚小学阳光安全政策的实施。
背景/目的:澳大利亚目前的SunSmart政策由癌症委员会使用自我报告的调查数据实施和审查。方法:研究人员对澳大利亚小学阳光安全政策的实施情况进行了外部评估,通过开展一项全国性调查,并根据SunSmart政策构建了问题。采用多变量二元logistic回归来了解各种防晒活动与学校特征之间的关系。结果:我们假设紫外线暴露等级较高的学校表现较好,因为感知风险较高。这对于全年统一的政策和户外风帆的存在是正确的。在澳大利亚的学校里,防晒霜的使用仍然不足。条件较好的学校的学生使用防晒霜的可能性是其他学校的2.1倍,这可能表明经济能力与意识之间存在关系,为未来的资金决策提供了一条途径。防晒眼镜的使用仍然不足,只有11.1%的学校鼓励学生使用,但天主教学校的学生戴太阳镜的可能性是其他学校的两倍。在极端紫外线地区的学校,使用太阳镜的几率比最低,这突出了未来干预的明确目标。研究还发现了学校类型的其他重要差异,包括私立学校的学生穿SunSmart校服的可能性要低58%。结论:我们发现澳大利亚不同类型学校在阳光安全行为方面存在统计学上显著的不平等,这为未来的资助和政策决策提供了实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信