Diverse Treatment Goals in Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights from participants in the PARC cohort.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Astia Allenzara, Kat Bush, M Elaine Husni, Soumya M Reddy, Jose U Scher, Ethan Craig, Joelle Koplin, Jessica A Walsh, Alexis Ogdie
{"title":"Diverse Treatment Goals in Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights from participants in the PARC cohort.","authors":"Astia Allenzara, Kat Bush, M Elaine Husni, Soumya M Reddy, Jose U Scher, Ethan Craig, Joelle Koplin, Jessica A Walsh, Alexis Ogdie","doi":"10.1002/acr.25527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to examine patient-reported treatment goals among individuals with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) completed standardized assessments including patient-reported outcome (PROs) instruments between 2017-2020. Additionally, participants were asked two open-ended questions at enrollment or therapy initiation \"If you could improve one thing about your disease, what would it be?\" and \"What would an effective treatment change for you?\" to identify patients' top improvement priority and their treatment impact goals, respectively. We categorized each response into a theme. The themes were matched to constructs measured by PRO items (i.e., pain, fatigue, skin, etc.). We describe themes and scores from matched PRO items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessments were completed by 193 participants. Decreasing pain (56%) and improving skin (12%) were the most common improvement priorities. Impact goals were more diverse and included decreasing pain (24%), general improvement in life (18%), the ability to be more active (15%), participate in recreational activities (9%), function at work (11%) and exercise (5%). Of note, responses were often matched to more than one PRO item or instrument. The scores for PRO items that matched the patient's improvement priority, or the impact goal were higher than scores for the remainder of the population (i.e., fatigue item scores were higher among individuals identifying fatigue as their improvement priority).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The heterogeneity of treatment goals underscores the importance of eliciting patient treatment goals to guide personalized management. Specific items within PROs may be helpful in identifying and following patient-specific treatment goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to examine patient-reported treatment goals among individuals with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: Participants in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) completed standardized assessments including patient-reported outcome (PROs) instruments between 2017-2020. Additionally, participants were asked two open-ended questions at enrollment or therapy initiation "If you could improve one thing about your disease, what would it be?" and "What would an effective treatment change for you?" to identify patients' top improvement priority and their treatment impact goals, respectively. We categorized each response into a theme. The themes were matched to constructs measured by PRO items (i.e., pain, fatigue, skin, etc.). We describe themes and scores from matched PRO items.

Results: Assessments were completed by 193 participants. Decreasing pain (56%) and improving skin (12%) were the most common improvement priorities. Impact goals were more diverse and included decreasing pain (24%), general improvement in life (18%), the ability to be more active (15%), participate in recreational activities (9%), function at work (11%) and exercise (5%). Of note, responses were often matched to more than one PRO item or instrument. The scores for PRO items that matched the patient's improvement priority, or the impact goal were higher than scores for the remainder of the population (i.e., fatigue item scores were higher among individuals identifying fatigue as their improvement priority).

Conclusions: The heterogeneity of treatment goals underscores the importance of eliciting patient treatment goals to guide personalized management. Specific items within PROs may be helpful in identifying and following patient-specific treatment goals.

银屑病关节炎的不同治疗目标:PARC队列参与者的见解
目的:目的是检查银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者报告的治疗目标。方法:银屑病关节炎研究联盟(PARC)的参与者在2017-2020年间完成了标准化评估,包括患者报告的结果(PROs)工具。此外,参与者在入组或治疗开始时被问及两个开放式问题:“如果你能改善你的疾病的一件事,那将是什么?”和“对你来说有效的治疗改变是什么?”分别确定患者的最高改善优先级和治疗影响目标。我们将每个回应分为一个主题。主题与PRO项目(即疼痛、疲劳、皮肤等)测量的结构相匹配。我们从匹配的PRO项目中描述主题和分数。结果:193名参与者完成了评估。减轻疼痛(56%)和改善皮肤(12%)是最常见的改善重点。影响目标更加多样化,包括减轻疼痛(24%)、总体改善生活(18%)、更活跃(15%)、参与娱乐活动(9%)、工作功能(11%)和锻炼(5%)。值得注意的是,回答通常与多个PRO项目或工具相匹配。与患者的改善优先级或影响目标相匹配的PRO项目得分高于其余人群的得分(即,疲劳项目得分在将疲劳确定为其改善优先级的个体中较高)。结论:治疗目标的异质性强调了明确患者治疗目标以指导个性化管理的重要性。PROs中的特定项目可能有助于确定和遵循患者特定的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
368
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信