Efficacy of reduced-dose gadobutrol versus standard-dose gadoterate in contrast-enhanced MRI for the evaluation of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tae Ran Ahn, Yu Mi Jeong, Ji Young Jeon
{"title":"Efficacy of reduced-dose gadobutrol versus standard-dose gadoterate in contrast-enhanced MRI for the evaluation of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.","authors":"Tae Ran Ahn, Yu Mi Jeong, Ji Young Jeon","doi":"10.1177/02841851251330281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundGadobutrol is a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) with higher relaxivity than other GBCAs, suggesting the potential for dose reduction without compromising image quality.PurposeTo evaluate whether a 30% reduced dose of gadobutrol is as effective as the standard dose of gadoterate for lesion visualization and enhancement in diabetic foot osteomyelitis.MethodsThis study included 132 patients with preoperative contrast-enhanced foot MRIs prior to amputation surgery for diabetic foot osteomyelitis from November 2020 to January 2023. Sixty-six enhanced foot MRIs with reduced dose gadobutrol (0.07 mmol/kg) and 66 MRIs with standard dose gadoterate (0.1 mmol/kg) were reviewed by two radiologists. For the primary study objective, two parameters (lesion border visualization and subjective lesion enhancement) for qualitative lesion visualization were assessed between the two agents using a noninferiority analysis. In the quantitative assessment of lesion enhancement, lesion-to-background ratio and enhancement percentage were compared between the two agents.ResultsThe mean scores for lesion border delineation and the visual degree of contrast enhancement were nearly identical between the two groups. For both readers, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference did not drop below -0.35, which is above the noninferiority margin. Regarding quantitative analysis, no significant differences were observed in the enhancement percentage and lesion-to-background ratio between the two agents (<i>p</i> > 0.5).ConclusionA 30% reduced dose of gadobutrol (0.07 mmol/kg) is as effective as the standard gadoterate dose (0.1 mmol/kg) for lesion visualization in contrast-enhanced MRI of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, with similar enhancement efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251330281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251330281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundGadobutrol is a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) with higher relaxivity than other GBCAs, suggesting the potential for dose reduction without compromising image quality.PurposeTo evaluate whether a 30% reduced dose of gadobutrol is as effective as the standard dose of gadoterate for lesion visualization and enhancement in diabetic foot osteomyelitis.MethodsThis study included 132 patients with preoperative contrast-enhanced foot MRIs prior to amputation surgery for diabetic foot osteomyelitis from November 2020 to January 2023. Sixty-six enhanced foot MRIs with reduced dose gadobutrol (0.07 mmol/kg) and 66 MRIs with standard dose gadoterate (0.1 mmol/kg) were reviewed by two radiologists. For the primary study objective, two parameters (lesion border visualization and subjective lesion enhancement) for qualitative lesion visualization were assessed between the two agents using a noninferiority analysis. In the quantitative assessment of lesion enhancement, lesion-to-background ratio and enhancement percentage were compared between the two agents.ResultsThe mean scores for lesion border delineation and the visual degree of contrast enhancement were nearly identical between the two groups. For both readers, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference did not drop below -0.35, which is above the noninferiority margin. Regarding quantitative analysis, no significant differences were observed in the enhancement percentage and lesion-to-background ratio between the two agents (p > 0.5).ConclusionA 30% reduced dose of gadobutrol (0.07 mmol/kg) is as effective as the standard gadoterate dose (0.1 mmol/kg) for lesion visualization in contrast-enhanced MRI of diabetic foot osteomyelitis, with similar enhancement efficacy.

减少剂量加多比特与标准剂量加多比特在对比增强MRI中评估糖尿病足骨髓炎的疗效。
gadobutrol是一种比其他大环钆基造影剂(GBCA)具有更高弛豫度的大环钆基造影剂(GBCA),表明在不影响图像质量的情况下减少剂量的潜力。目的评价减少30%剂量的加多比特对糖尿病足骨髓炎病变的显像和增强效果是否与标准剂量的加多比特同样有效。方法本研究纳入了2020年11月至2023年1月期间132例糖尿病足骨髓炎截肢手术前术前对比增强足部mri患者。两名放射科医生回顾了66张低剂量加多比特(0.07 mmol/kg)增强足部mri和66张标准剂量加多比特(0.1 mmol/kg) mri。对于主要研究目标,使用非劣效性分析评估两种药物之间定性病变可视化的两个参数(病变边界可视化和主观病变增强)。在定量评估病变增强时,比较两种药物的病灶背景比和增强百分比。结果两组病变边界划分的平均评分和视觉增强程度几乎相同。对于两位读者来说,差异的95%置信区间(CI)的下限没有低于-0.35,这高于非劣效性边际。在定量分析方面,两种药物的增强率和病灶背景比无显著差异(p > 0.5)。结论减少30%剂量(0.07 mmol/kg)的加多比特与标准剂量(0.1 mmol/kg)的加多比特对糖尿病足骨髓炎MRI增强病灶的显像效果相当,增强效果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信