Jack W Power, Philip J Dempsey, Andrew Yates, Nisha Soman, Mercy D'Souza, Catherine McGarvey, Kiaran J O'malley, David J Galvin, Barry D Hutchinson, John G Murray, Michelle M McNicholas, Carmel G Cronin
{"title":"Patient satisfaction rates and tolerance of free-hand ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy in an outpatient setting.","authors":"Jack W Power, Philip J Dempsey, Andrew Yates, Nisha Soman, Mercy D'Souza, Catherine McGarvey, Kiaran J O'malley, David J Galvin, Barry D Hutchinson, John G Murray, Michelle M McNicholas, Carmel G Cronin","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04867-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPPBx) under local anesthesia is becoming increasingly utilized due to its lower infection risk compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Despite its increasing utilization, patient experience with this procedure remains an area requiring further investigation. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and tolerance of outpatient free-hand ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPBx), focusing on patient experiences during and after the procedure, and its impact on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted on 120 men undergoing TPPBx, using 2 standardized questionnaires; the day after the procedure and at follow-up 3-4 weeks later. Data on pain, post-procedural symptoms, and overall satisfaction were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 120 participants, 97 completed both questionnaires (81% response rate). The mean age was 65 years, with a median of 66. Satisfaction with care was high, with 100% of patients satisfied and 89% willing to undergo the procedure again. Mean pain scores were as follows: probe insertion 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-5), local anesthetic administration 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-4), and biopsy sampling 2/10 (median 1, IQR 0-3). Post-procedural symptoms included hematuria (63%) and hematospermia (49%), with the latter distressing for 17% of patients. No infections or hospital admissions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPPBx is a safe, effective, and tolerable method for prostate biopsy, with minimal complications and high satisfaction rates. Enhanced patient education and communication will be crucial as its adoption increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04867-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPPBx) under local anesthesia is becoming increasingly utilized due to its lower infection risk compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. Despite its increasing utilization, patient experience with this procedure remains an area requiring further investigation. This study aims to evaluate patient satisfaction and tolerance of outpatient free-hand ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPBx), focusing on patient experiences during and after the procedure, and its impact on quality of life.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 120 men undergoing TPPBx, using 2 standardized questionnaires; the day after the procedure and at follow-up 3-4 weeks later. Data on pain, post-procedural symptoms, and overall satisfaction were collected.
Results: Of the 120 participants, 97 completed both questionnaires (81% response rate). The mean age was 65 years, with a median of 66. Satisfaction with care was high, with 100% of patients satisfied and 89% willing to undergo the procedure again. Mean pain scores were as follows: probe insertion 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-5), local anesthetic administration 3/10 (median 2, IQR 1-4), and biopsy sampling 2/10 (median 1, IQR 0-3). Post-procedural symptoms included hematuria (63%) and hematospermia (49%), with the latter distressing for 17% of patients. No infections or hospital admissions were reported.
Conclusion: TPPBx is a safe, effective, and tolerable method for prostate biopsy, with minimal complications and high satisfaction rates. Enhanced patient education and communication will be crucial as its adoption increases.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits