Purity determination of digitoxin by two-signal suppression–internal standard correction–high-performance liquid chromatography–quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Huaxin Wu, Ting Huang, Wei Zhang, Huan Yao, Xueyao Li, Ping Su, Yi Yang
{"title":"Purity determination of digitoxin by two-signal suppression–internal standard correction–high-performance liquid chromatography–quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance","authors":"Huaxin Wu,&nbsp;Ting Huang,&nbsp;Wei Zhang,&nbsp;Huan Yao,&nbsp;Xueyao Li,&nbsp;Ping Su,&nbsp;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-05836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the biomedical and chemical fields, purity assessment of compounds is a critical step in ensuring product quality and safety. In this study, a method for purity quantification was proposed as two-signal suppression–internal standard correction–high-performance liquid chromatography–quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (TSS-ISC-HPLC-qNMR). The two-signal suppression effectively suppresses the interference of solvent signals in the NMR spectra, and the internal standard correction eliminates the influence of many variables during sample preparation and analysis. The purity result (99.89%) of the quantification of certified reference material of acesulfame (AF) by this method matched with the certified value (99.88%), which verified the accuracy of the method. The purity result (with standard deviation) of 94.42% ± 0.10% for the quantification of the low-purity drug digitoxin by the method matched with the purity result of 94.42% ± 0.11% by qNMR with deconvolution (as a validated method), which proved that the method could be used for the quantification of low-purity compounds. The methodology achieved a substantial reduction in total analysis time, from 28 to 4 h (considering only the routine analysis time after optimization), in contrast to the ISC-HPLC-qNMR approach. Additionally, it effectively decreased bias to undetectable with a standard deviation of 0.10%, while the bias of the TSS-HPLC-qNMR method was 0.93%. The present method ensures the accuracy of the quantitative results while demonstrating a low economic burden and significant time efficiency, which shows great potential for application in the accurate quantitative analysis of low-purity organic compounds.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":"417 13","pages":"2935 - 2946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00216-025-05836-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the biomedical and chemical fields, purity assessment of compounds is a critical step in ensuring product quality and safety. In this study, a method for purity quantification was proposed as two-signal suppression–internal standard correction–high-performance liquid chromatography–quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (TSS-ISC-HPLC-qNMR). The two-signal suppression effectively suppresses the interference of solvent signals in the NMR spectra, and the internal standard correction eliminates the influence of many variables during sample preparation and analysis. The purity result (99.89%) of the quantification of certified reference material of acesulfame (AF) by this method matched with the certified value (99.88%), which verified the accuracy of the method. The purity result (with standard deviation) of 94.42% ± 0.10% for the quantification of the low-purity drug digitoxin by the method matched with the purity result of 94.42% ± 0.11% by qNMR with deconvolution (as a validated method), which proved that the method could be used for the quantification of low-purity compounds. The methodology achieved a substantial reduction in total analysis time, from 28 to 4 h (considering only the routine analysis time after optimization), in contrast to the ISC-HPLC-qNMR approach. Additionally, it effectively decreased bias to undetectable with a standard deviation of 0.10%, while the bias of the TSS-HPLC-qNMR method was 0.93%. The present method ensures the accuracy of the quantitative results while demonstrating a low economic burden and significant time efficiency, which shows great potential for application in the accurate quantitative analysis of low-purity organic compounds.

Graphical Abstract

双信号抑制-内标校正-高效液相色谱-定量核磁共振法测定地黄毒素纯度。
在生物医学和化学领域,化合物的纯度评价是保证产品质量和安全的关键步骤。本研究提出了一种双信号抑制-内标校正-高效液相色谱-定量核磁共振(TSS-ISC-HPLC-qNMR)的纯度定量方法。双信号抑制有效地抑制了核磁共振光谱中溶剂信号的干扰,内标校正消除了样品制备和分析过程中许多变量的影响。该方法定量标准物质乙酰磺胺(AF)的纯度结果(99.89%)与认证值(99.88%)吻合,验证了方法的准确性。该方法定量低纯度药物地地黄毒素的纯度(标准差)为94.42%±0.10%,与经验证的qNMR反褶积法的纯度(94.42%±0.11%)相吻合,证明该方法可用于低纯度化合物的定量。与iscc - hplc - qnmr方法相比,该方法实现了总分析时间的大幅减少,从28小时减少到4小时(仅考虑优化后的常规分析时间)。此外,该方法有效地将偏差降低到无法检测,标准偏差为0.10%,而TSS-HPLC-qNMR方法的偏差为0.93%。本方法在保证定量结果准确性的同时,经济负担低,时间效率高,在低纯度有机化合物的精确定量分析中具有很大的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信