Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Camille M Montalcini, Charles C Driver, Michael T Mendl
{"title":"Relevance of state-behaviour feedbacks for animal welfare.","authors":"Camille M Montalcini, Charles C Driver, Michael T Mendl","doi":"10.1111/brv.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An animal's behaviour and its state, including its health and affective state, are dynamic and tightly coupled, influencing each other over time. Although both are relevant to the animal's welfare, there has been limited research on their dynamics in welfare studies. Here we aim to: (i) review evidence for feedbacks between state and behaviour that could have beneficial or detrimental consequences for farm animal welfare; (ii) propose ways in which an understanding of such feedbacks could be used to enhance welfare; and (iii) provide practical guidance. We include as state variables any features that could influence the costs and benefits of an animal's behavioural actions, including individual characteristics and aspects of its social environment. We find evidence supporting positive state-behaviour feedback loops in various livestock species, suggesting that these loops could be common in farm settings and have significant welfare implications, such as leading to abnormal behaviours and persistent negative affective states. We suggest (i) estimating within-individual feedback loops to extract individual characteristics for studying differences in welfare; (ii) identifying scenarios where change accelerated by positive feedbacks pushes an animal (or a group of animals) to a new state, also called tipping points; and (iii) generating positive feedback loops to elicit and maintain positive affective states. We end by encouraging use of dynamic models that integrate longitudinal data on animals' behaviour and state to enable exploration of their dynamics, and we provide a practical guide with annotated R code for support. Since the principles and ideas discussed here are relevant to any animals under human care, this approach could foster new perspectives for improving the welfare of all captive animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An animal's behaviour and its state, including its health and affective state, are dynamic and tightly coupled, influencing each other over time. Although both are relevant to the animal's welfare, there has been limited research on their dynamics in welfare studies. Here we aim to: (i) review evidence for feedbacks between state and behaviour that could have beneficial or detrimental consequences for farm animal welfare; (ii) propose ways in which an understanding of such feedbacks could be used to enhance welfare; and (iii) provide practical guidance. We include as state variables any features that could influence the costs and benefits of an animal's behavioural actions, including individual characteristics and aspects of its social environment. We find evidence supporting positive state-behaviour feedback loops in various livestock species, suggesting that these loops could be common in farm settings and have significant welfare implications, such as leading to abnormal behaviours and persistent negative affective states. We suggest (i) estimating within-individual feedback loops to extract individual characteristics for studying differences in welfare; (ii) identifying scenarios where change accelerated by positive feedbacks pushes an animal (or a group of animals) to a new state, also called tipping points; and (iii) generating positive feedback loops to elicit and maintain positive affective states. We end by encouraging use of dynamic models that integrate longitudinal data on animals' behaviour and state to enable exploration of their dynamics, and we provide a practical guide with annotated R code for support. Since the principles and ideas discussed here are relevant to any animals under human care, this approach could foster new perspectives for improving the welfare of all captive animals.

国家行为反馈与动物福利的相关性。
动物的行为和它的状态,包括它的健康和情感状态,是动态的和紧密耦合的,随着时间的推移相互影响。虽然两者都与动物福利有关,但在福利研究中对它们的动态研究有限。在这里,我们的目标是:(i)审查可能对农场动物福利产生有益或有害后果的状态和行为之间反馈的证据;(ii)建议如何利用对这些反馈的了解来提高福利;(三)提供实践指导。我们将任何可能影响动物行为的成本和收益的特征(包括个体特征及其社会环境的各个方面)纳入状态变量。我们在各种牲畜物种中发现了支持积极状态-行为反馈循环的证据,这表明这些循环在农场环境中可能很常见,并且具有重大的福利影响,例如导致异常行为和持续的消极情感状态。我们建议(1)估计个体内反馈回路,提取个体特征,用于研究福利差异;(ii)识别由正反馈加速的变化将动物(或动物群体)推向新状态的场景,也称为引爆点;(三)产生正反馈循环,以引出并维持积极的情感状态。最后,我们鼓励使用动态模型,这些模型集成了动物行为和状态的纵向数据,以便探索它们的动态,并且我们提供了一个带有注释的R代码支持的实用指南。由于这里讨论的原则和想法与人类照顾下的任何动物都有关,因此这种方法可以为改善所有圈养动物的福利提供新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信