Global patterns in community-scale leaf mass per area distributions of extant woody non-monocot angiosperms and their utility in the fossil record

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Alexander J. Lowe, Dana L. Royer, Daniel J. Wieczynski, Matthew J. Butrim, Tammo Reichgelt, Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt, Daniel J. Peppe, Brian J. Enquist, Andrew J. Kerkoff, Sean T. Michaletz, Caroline A. E. Strömberg
{"title":"Global patterns in community-scale leaf mass per area distributions of extant woody non-monocot angiosperms and their utility in the fossil record","authors":"Alexander J. Lowe,&nbsp;Dana L. Royer,&nbsp;Daniel J. Wieczynski,&nbsp;Matthew J. Butrim,&nbsp;Tammo Reichgelt,&nbsp;Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt,&nbsp;Daniel J. Peppe,&nbsp;Brian J. Enquist,&nbsp;Andrew J. Kerkoff,&nbsp;Sean T. Michaletz,&nbsp;Caroline A. E. Strömberg","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Leaf mass per area (LMA) links leaf economic strategies, community assembly, and climate and can be reconstructed from woody non-monocot angiosperm (WNMA) fossils using the petiole metric (PM; petiole width<sup>2</sup>/leaf area). Reliable interpretation of LMA reconstructed from the fossil record is limited by an incomplete understanding of how PM and LMA are correlated at the community scale and what climatic parameters drive variation of both measured and reconstructed LMA of WNMAs globally.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A modern, global, community-scale data set of in situ WNMA LMA and PM was compiled to test leading hypotheses for environmental drivers of LMA and quantify LMA-PM relationships. Correlations among PM, LMA, climate (Köppen types and continuous data), and leaf habit were assessed and quantified using several uni- and multivariate methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Community mean LMA increased under warmer and less seasonal temperatures. Drought-prone communities had the highest LMA variance, likely due to disparity between riparian and non-riparian microhabitats. PM and LMA were correlated for community mean and variance, and their correlations with climate were similar. These patterns indicate that climatic correlatives of modern LMA can inform relative trends in reconstructed fossil LMA. In contrast, matching “absolute” LMA distributions between fossil and modern sites does not allow reliable inference of analogous climate types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study furthers our understanding of processes influencing the assembly of WNMA leaf economic strategies in plant communities, highlighting the importance of temperature seasonality and habitat heterogeneity. We also provide a method to reconstruct, and refine the framework to interpret, community-scale LMA in the fossil record.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Leaf mass per area (LMA) links leaf economic strategies, community assembly, and climate and can be reconstructed from woody non-monocot angiosperm (WNMA) fossils using the petiole metric (PM; petiole width2/leaf area). Reliable interpretation of LMA reconstructed from the fossil record is limited by an incomplete understanding of how PM and LMA are correlated at the community scale and what climatic parameters drive variation of both measured and reconstructed LMA of WNMAs globally.

Methods

A modern, global, community-scale data set of in situ WNMA LMA and PM was compiled to test leading hypotheses for environmental drivers of LMA and quantify LMA-PM relationships. Correlations among PM, LMA, climate (Köppen types and continuous data), and leaf habit were assessed and quantified using several uni- and multivariate methods.

Results

Community mean LMA increased under warmer and less seasonal temperatures. Drought-prone communities had the highest LMA variance, likely due to disparity between riparian and non-riparian microhabitats. PM and LMA were correlated for community mean and variance, and their correlations with climate were similar. These patterns indicate that climatic correlatives of modern LMA can inform relative trends in reconstructed fossil LMA. In contrast, matching “absolute” LMA distributions between fossil and modern sites does not allow reliable inference of analogous climate types.

Conclusions

This study furthers our understanding of processes influencing the assembly of WNMA leaf economic strategies in plant communities, highlighting the importance of temperature seasonality and habitat heterogeneity. We also provide a method to reconstruct, and refine the framework to interpret, community-scale LMA in the fossil record.

现存木本非单子叶被子植物群落面积叶质量分布的全球格局及其在化石记录中的应用
前提:每面积叶质量(LMA)与叶片经济策略、群落聚集和气候有关,可以利用叶柄度量(PM)从木本非单子叶被子植物(WNMA)化石中重建。叶柄宽度2/叶面积)。由于对群落尺度上PM和LMA的相关性以及气候参数驱动全球wnma测量和重建的LMA变化的不完全理解,限制了对化石记录重建的LMA的可靠解释。方法:利用现代、全球、社区尺度的原位WNMA、LMA和PM数据集,验证LMA环境驱动因素的主要假设,并量化LMA-PM关系。利用单变量和多变量方法对PM、LMA、气候(Köppen类型和连续数据)和叶习性之间的相关性进行了评估和量化。结果:群落平均LMA随季节变暖而增加。干旱易发群落的LMA方差最高,这可能是由于河岸微生境与非河岸微生境之间的差异。PM和LMA在群落均值和方差上呈相关性,与气候的相关性相似。这些模式表明,现代LMA的气候相关性可以为重建的化石LMA的相对趋势提供信息。相比之下,匹配化石和现代地点之间的“绝对”LMA分布不能可靠地推断出类似的气候类型。结论:本研究进一步揭示了植物群落WNMA叶片经济策略组装的影响过程,强调了温度季节性和生境异质性的重要性。我们还提供了一种重建和完善化石记录中群落尺度LMA解释框架的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信