The Safety And Effectiveness of Slow Pathway Region Visualization Strategy in Radiofrequency Ablation for Adults with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Wenchi Guan, Jun Liu, Yanbing Gu, Jianjun Li, Keping Chen, Yan Yao
{"title":"The Safety And Effectiveness of Slow Pathway Region Visualization Strategy in Radiofrequency Ablation for Adults with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.","authors":"Wenchi Guan, Jun Liu, Yanbing Gu, Jianjun Li, Keping Chen, Yan Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeting the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway (AVNsp) is the standard treatment in catheter ablation procedures for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, significant anatomical variability in Koch's triangle poses challenges for precise ablation and increases the risk of atrioventricular block (AVB). Previous studies have reported that the AVNsp visualization strategy reduces the incidence of AVB, however, these studies were conducted in pediatric patients or with the energy of cryoablation. However, the safety and effectiveness of this strategy in adults undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of high-density mapping (HDM)-guided AVNsp visualization strategy for AVNRT ablation compared to the conventional approach. We retrospectively analyzed data from 149 AVNRT patients across three hospitals in China. Patients were divided into two groups: experimental group (i.e. treated with the HDM-guided AVNsp visualization strategy, n=88) and control group (i.e. treated with the traditional mapping and ablation strategy, n=61). Procedural parameters, complication rates, and long-term outcomes were compared. The experimental group required fewer ablation points (4.8±3.6 vs 8.5±7.7, P=0.003), shorter total ablation time (284±178s vs 408±345s, P=0.028), and reduced procedure time (41.4±14.2min vs 51.5±27.2min, P=0.009) compared with the control group. No cases of AVB occurred in the experimental group, while the control group reported 5(8.2%) transient AVB and 1(1.6%) persistent first-degree AVB after procedure. After a mean follow-up of 488±246 days, no recurrences of AVNRT were observed in either group. In conclusion, for adult patients with AVNRT, the AVNsp visualization strategy enhances the safety and effectiveness of RFA by reducing procedure time and minimizing the risk of AVB.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.03.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeting the atrioventricular nodal slow pathway (AVNsp) is the standard treatment in catheter ablation procedures for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, significant anatomical variability in Koch's triangle poses challenges for precise ablation and increases the risk of atrioventricular block (AVB). Previous studies have reported that the AVNsp visualization strategy reduces the incidence of AVB, however, these studies were conducted in pediatric patients or with the energy of cryoablation. However, the safety and effectiveness of this strategy in adults undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of high-density mapping (HDM)-guided AVNsp visualization strategy for AVNRT ablation compared to the conventional approach. We retrospectively analyzed data from 149 AVNRT patients across three hospitals in China. Patients were divided into two groups: experimental group (i.e. treated with the HDM-guided AVNsp visualization strategy, n=88) and control group (i.e. treated with the traditional mapping and ablation strategy, n=61). Procedural parameters, complication rates, and long-term outcomes were compared. The experimental group required fewer ablation points (4.8±3.6 vs 8.5±7.7, P=0.003), shorter total ablation time (284±178s vs 408±345s, P=0.028), and reduced procedure time (41.4±14.2min vs 51.5±27.2min, P=0.009) compared with the control group. No cases of AVB occurred in the experimental group, while the control group reported 5(8.2%) transient AVB and 1(1.6%) persistent first-degree AVB after procedure. After a mean follow-up of 488±246 days, no recurrences of AVNRT were observed in either group. In conclusion, for adult patients with AVNRT, the AVNsp visualization strategy enhances the safety and effectiveness of RFA by reducing procedure time and minimizing the risk of AVB.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信