Measurement and evaluation of community engagement in complex, chronic medical conditions: HIV and obesity as exemplar conditions

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1111/obr.13919
Andrew D. Brown, A. Colin Bell, Josh Hayward, Tiana Felmingham, Steven Allender
{"title":"Measurement and evaluation of community engagement in complex, chronic medical conditions: HIV and obesity as exemplar conditions","authors":"Andrew D. Brown,&nbsp;A. Colin Bell,&nbsp;Josh Hayward,&nbsp;Tiana Felmingham,&nbsp;Steven Allender","doi":"10.1111/obr.13919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective To systematically review, describe, and compare quantitative measures of community engagement in obesity and HIV prevention research. Materials &amp; Methods A systematic review adhering to PRISMA and PROSPERO guidelines was conducted, searching seven databases. Screening and quality assessment were carried out by four reviewers independently. Studies were included if they explicitly used community engagement for obesity or HIV prevention and quantitatively measured community engagement. Extracted data included descriptions of community engagement, measurement constructs, and statistical results. Results Of 8922 studies screened by title and abstract and 1326 studies screened by full text, 13 studies were included from obesity prevention and 42 studies from HIV prevention. The studies used a range of terms for community engagement, highlighting differing approaches and challenges in measurement. Quantitative measures of community engagement varied across the studies. When change over time in community engagement was analyzed, an increase in engagement was generally found, and when an association between engagement and health was tested, a positive association was generally found. Conclusion Despite diverse measurement approaches, drawing parallels between obesity and HIV prevention offers new pathways to strengthen community engagement evaluations through the iteration of existing measures across the two fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"26 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.13919","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To systematically review, describe, and compare quantitative measures of community engagement in obesity and HIV prevention research. Materials & Methods A systematic review adhering to PRISMA and PROSPERO guidelines was conducted, searching seven databases. Screening and quality assessment were carried out by four reviewers independently. Studies were included if they explicitly used community engagement for obesity or HIV prevention and quantitatively measured community engagement. Extracted data included descriptions of community engagement, measurement constructs, and statistical results. Results Of 8922 studies screened by title and abstract and 1326 studies screened by full text, 13 studies were included from obesity prevention and 42 studies from HIV prevention. The studies used a range of terms for community engagement, highlighting differing approaches and challenges in measurement. Quantitative measures of community engagement varied across the studies. When change over time in community engagement was analyzed, an increase in engagement was generally found, and when an association between engagement and health was tested, a positive association was generally found. Conclusion Despite diverse measurement approaches, drawing parallels between obesity and HIV prevention offers new pathways to strengthen community engagement evaluations through the iteration of existing measures across the two fields.

Abstract Image

衡量和评价社区对复杂慢性疾病的参与:艾滋病毒和肥胖症为例。
目的系统回顾、描述和比较社区参与肥胖和艾滋病预防研究的定量措施。材料与方法遵循PRISMA和PROSPERO指南进行系统评价,检索7个数据库。筛选和质量评估由四名评审员独立进行。如果研究明确使用社区参与预防肥胖或艾滋病毒,并定量测量社区参与,则将其纳入研究。提取的数据包括社区参与、测量结构和统计结果的描述。结果在标题和摘要筛选的8922项研究和全文筛选的1326项研究中,13项研究来自肥胖预防,42项研究来自艾滋病毒预防。这些研究使用了一系列术语来描述社区参与,突出了不同的测量方法和挑战。在不同的研究中,社区参与的定量测量方法各不相同。当分析社区参与度随时间的变化时,通常会发现参与度的增加,当测试参与度与健康之间的联系时,通常会发现一种积极的联系。尽管测量方法多种多样,但通过对肥胖和艾滋病预防之间的相似之处,通过迭代两个领域的现有措施,为加强社区参与评估提供了新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信