Impact of truck electrification on air pollution disparities in the United States

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Wilson H. McNeil, Jason Porzio, Fan Tong, Robert A. Harley, Maximilian Auffhammer, Corinne D. Scown
{"title":"Impact of truck electrification on air pollution disparities in the United States","authors":"Wilson H. McNeil, Jason Porzio, Fan Tong, Robert A. Harley, Maximilian Auffhammer, Corinne D. Scown","doi":"10.1038/s41893-025-01515-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electrifying heavy-duty trucks reduces on-road diesel emissions but shifts the burden of supplying energy to power-generation facilities. The combined effect of Inflation Reduction Act investments in grid decarbonization and truck electrification will alter the magnitude and distribution of air pollution burdens across the United States. These investments are intended to facilitate a just energy transition, with 40% of the benefits flowing to disadvantaged communities per the Justice40 Initiative. Here we evaluate the combined effects of Inflation Reduction Act grid decarbonization and truck electrification investments on a national scale to determine whether the air pollution benefits would meet this 40% goal for both disadvantaged communities and the most exposed racial–ethnic groups. We find that truck electrification and decarbonization reduce air-pollution-related premature mortality in disadvantaged communities. However, the relative disparity between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged communities increases, suggesting that a disproportionate share of benefits accrue to non-disadvantaged communities. Whereas absolute disparity in grid emissions decreases over time for all racial–ethnic groups, relative disparity remains largely unchanged, with Black populations being the most exposed. Electrifying drayage corridors would result in comparatively large health benefits for disadvantaged communities, suggesting that increasing targeted electrification investments in short-haul routes near urban areas (for example, ports) could be promising. Grid decarbonization and truck electrification investments in the United States aim to support a just energy transition. Although such efforts reduce air-pollution-related premature mortality in disadvantaged communities, the relative disparity between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged communities increases.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"8 3","pages":"276-286"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-025-01515-x.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-025-01515-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrifying heavy-duty trucks reduces on-road diesel emissions but shifts the burden of supplying energy to power-generation facilities. The combined effect of Inflation Reduction Act investments in grid decarbonization and truck electrification will alter the magnitude and distribution of air pollution burdens across the United States. These investments are intended to facilitate a just energy transition, with 40% of the benefits flowing to disadvantaged communities per the Justice40 Initiative. Here we evaluate the combined effects of Inflation Reduction Act grid decarbonization and truck electrification investments on a national scale to determine whether the air pollution benefits would meet this 40% goal for both disadvantaged communities and the most exposed racial–ethnic groups. We find that truck electrification and decarbonization reduce air-pollution-related premature mortality in disadvantaged communities. However, the relative disparity between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged communities increases, suggesting that a disproportionate share of benefits accrue to non-disadvantaged communities. Whereas absolute disparity in grid emissions decreases over time for all racial–ethnic groups, relative disparity remains largely unchanged, with Black populations being the most exposed. Electrifying drayage corridors would result in comparatively large health benefits for disadvantaged communities, suggesting that increasing targeted electrification investments in short-haul routes near urban areas (for example, ports) could be promising. Grid decarbonization and truck electrification investments in the United States aim to support a just energy transition. Although such efforts reduce air-pollution-related premature mortality in disadvantaged communities, the relative disparity between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged communities increases.

Abstract Image

卡车电气化对美国空气污染差异的影响
重型卡车的电气化减少了道路上的柴油排放,但将供应能源的负担转移给了发电设施。《减少通货膨胀法案》在电网脱碳和卡车电气化方面的投资的综合影响将改变美国空气污染负担的规模和分布。这些投资旨在促进公平的能源转型,根据“正义40倡议”,40%的收益流向弱势社区。在这里,我们评估了《通货膨胀减少法案》在全国范围内的电网脱碳和卡车电气化投资的综合影响,以确定空气污染效益是否能满足弱势社区和最暴露的种族-民族群体40%的目标。我们发现,卡车电气化和脱碳降低了弱势社区与空气污染相关的过早死亡率。然而,处境不利社区和非处境不利社区之间的相对差距增加了,这表明非处境不利社区获得的利益份额不成比例。虽然电网排放的绝对差距随着时间的推移而减少,但相对差距基本保持不变,黑人人口是最容易受到影响的。电气化排水走廊将为弱势社区带来相对较大的健康效益,这表明在城市地区附近的短途路线(例如港口)增加有针对性的电气化投资可能是有希望的。美国的电网脱碳和卡车电气化投资旨在支持公正的能源转型。虽然这些努力减少了贫困社区与空气污染有关的过早死亡率,但贫困社区和非贫困社区之间的相对差距却在扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信