Tuğba Ongun Sevindik, Tolga Çetin, Ayşe Gül Tekbaba, Uğur Güzel
{"title":"Impacts of Lake Surface Area on Phytoplankton Community Dynamics and Ecological Status Across 70 Lentic Systems in Türkiye","authors":"Tuğba Ongun Sevindik, Tolga Çetin, Ayşe Gül Tekbaba, Uğur Güzel","doi":"10.1002/eco.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this study, phytoplankton communities and environmental variables in 70 lentic systems in Türkiye were analysed using samples collected from 2017 to 2019. The objective was to evaluate how lake surface area (SUA) affects phytoplankton assemblages. The lentic systems were categorized into three SUA groups: I (< 50 ha), II (50–500 ha) and III (> 500 ha). The results showed that both species composition and dominant species varied with SUA. Some species preferred larger SUAs and higher SUA optima values. Phytoplankton biovolume increased with SUA, particularly in Group III, which had the highest total phosphorus (TP). Species richness (alpha diversity) followed a unimodal distribution, peaking in Group II, whereas total species richness (gamma diversity) decreased with increasing SUA. The distribution of gamma diversity among different phytoplankton groups varied across the SUA categories, reflecting their distinct responses to SUA. The PHYTO-TR index proved to be a more precise tool for assessing the ecological quality of lentic systems, based on TP and phytoplankton biovolume. Groups I and II had a higher proportion of high-quality lentic systems. Parameters such as temperature (T), electrical conductivity (EC), alkalinity (ALK), Secchi depth (SD) and TP were significant factors influencing phytoplankton distribution, composition, biovolume and both alpha and gamma diversity, as well as the overall ecological quality. Although the effect of SUA, which correlates with T, ALK, EC and SD, on phytoplankton is largely indirect through these parameters, there was also evidence of a direct effect because of the varying responses of different phytoplankton groups to SUA.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55169,"journal":{"name":"Ecohydrology","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohydrology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, phytoplankton communities and environmental variables in 70 lentic systems in Türkiye were analysed using samples collected from 2017 to 2019. The objective was to evaluate how lake surface area (SUA) affects phytoplankton assemblages. The lentic systems were categorized into three SUA groups: I (< 50 ha), II (50–500 ha) and III (> 500 ha). The results showed that both species composition and dominant species varied with SUA. Some species preferred larger SUAs and higher SUA optima values. Phytoplankton biovolume increased with SUA, particularly in Group III, which had the highest total phosphorus (TP). Species richness (alpha diversity) followed a unimodal distribution, peaking in Group II, whereas total species richness (gamma diversity) decreased with increasing SUA. The distribution of gamma diversity among different phytoplankton groups varied across the SUA categories, reflecting their distinct responses to SUA. The PHYTO-TR index proved to be a more precise tool for assessing the ecological quality of lentic systems, based on TP and phytoplankton biovolume. Groups I and II had a higher proportion of high-quality lentic systems. Parameters such as temperature (T), electrical conductivity (EC), alkalinity (ALK), Secchi depth (SD) and TP were significant factors influencing phytoplankton distribution, composition, biovolume and both alpha and gamma diversity, as well as the overall ecological quality. Although the effect of SUA, which correlates with T, ALK, EC and SD, on phytoplankton is largely indirect through these parameters, there was also evidence of a direct effect because of the varying responses of different phytoplankton groups to SUA.
期刊介绍:
Ecohydrology is an international journal publishing original scientific and review papers that aim to improve understanding of processes at the interface between ecology and hydrology and associated applications related to environmental management.
Ecohydrology seeks to increase interdisciplinary insights by placing particular emphasis on interactions and associated feedbacks in both space and time between ecological systems and the hydrological cycle. Research contributions are solicited from disciplines focusing on the physical, ecological, biological, biogeochemical, geomorphological, drainage basin, mathematical and methodological aspects of ecohydrology. Research in both terrestrial and aquatic systems is of interest provided it explicitly links ecological systems and the hydrologic cycle; research such as aquatic ecological, channel engineering, or ecological or hydrological modelling is less appropriate for the journal unless it specifically addresses the criteria above. Manuscripts describing individual case studies are of interest in cases where broader insights are discussed beyond site- and species-specific results.