The Relationship of Social Cognition on Social Circle Size and Social Support in Young Adults Recovering From First Episode Psychosis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Janneke van Houts, Barbara Montagne
{"title":"The Relationship of Social Cognition on Social Circle Size and Social Support in Young Adults Recovering From First Episode Psychosis","authors":"Janneke van Houts,&nbsp;Barbara Montagne","doi":"10.1111/eip.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Young adults who experienced first episode psychosis (FEP) show impairments in social cognition, have smaller social circles, and experience less social support compared to their peers. While social cognition is important for social functioning, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive skills are related to social circle size or social support. It was examined whether participants with FEP and impairments in social cognition have smaller social circles and/or experience less social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional study comparing 35 FEP participants in early recovery and 35 well-matched controls on measures of emotion perception, theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social circle size, and social support, and the relationship between social cognitive impairment, social circle size, and social support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant differences between the two groups were found only for ToM and not for emotion perception or social perception. FEP participants had a significantly smaller social circle size and perceived significantly less social support. Correlations between ToM and social circle size or social support were limited, with no significant differences when compared at the group level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>FEP participants and controls differ on social circle size and social support, while concerning social cognition, there was only a difference found on ToM between both groups. Questions are raised as to whether social cognition is related to social circle size or perceived social support in early recovery of FEP. While mechanisms influencing social circle size and social support need further research, it is important to continue to focus on social contact after FEP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.70033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Young adults who experienced first episode psychosis (FEP) show impairments in social cognition, have smaller social circles, and experience less social support compared to their peers. While social cognition is important for social functioning, it is unclear whether these neurocognitive skills are related to social circle size or social support. It was examined whether participants with FEP and impairments in social cognition have smaller social circles and/or experience less social support.

Method

A cross-sectional study comparing 35 FEP participants in early recovery and 35 well-matched controls on measures of emotion perception, theory of mind (ToM), social perception, social circle size, and social support, and the relationship between social cognitive impairment, social circle size, and social support.

Results

Significant differences between the two groups were found only for ToM and not for emotion perception or social perception. FEP participants had a significantly smaller social circle size and perceived significantly less social support. Correlations between ToM and social circle size or social support were limited, with no significant differences when compared at the group level.

Conclusion

FEP participants and controls differ on social circle size and social support, while concerning social cognition, there was only a difference found on ToM between both groups. Questions are raised as to whether social cognition is related to social circle size or perceived social support in early recovery of FEP. While mechanisms influencing social circle size and social support need further research, it is important to continue to focus on social contact after FEP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信