Cássio Cardona Orth, Robert Carvalho da Silva, Guilherme Paes de Barros Carrilho, Paulo Fernando Mesquita de Carvalho, Julio Cesar Joly, Alex Nogueira Haas
{"title":"Vertical Bone Gain Post-Sinus Lifting and Simultaneous Implant Placement With Osseodensification: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Cássio Cardona Orth, Robert Carvalho da Silva, Guilherme Paes de Barros Carrilho, Paulo Fernando Mesquita de Carvalho, Julio Cesar Joly, Alex Nogueira Haas","doi":"10.1111/cid.13430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the bone height gain (BHG) achieved after sinus floor elevation (SFE) with osseodensification (OD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients from an implantology learning center presenting one missing teeth in the posterior maxilla and insufficient residual bone height (RBH) were included. SFE with simultaneous implant placement was performed using Densah drills. Demineralized bovine bone mineral, hydroxyapatite+β-TCP, calcium phosphosilicate, and autologous leukoplakelet fibrin were used as graft biomaterials. BHG was obtained by subtracting the implant length from the initial bone height.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Sinus membrane perforation occurred in 4.8% of 144 cases. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were analyzed for BHG. RBH equaled 5.4 ± 1.8 mm, with 42 (30.7%) cases having < 5 mm. The average implant length (AIL) was 8.8 ± 1.1 mm, resulting in a mean BHG of 3.4 ± 1.7 mm. BHG was significantly higher in cases with RBH < 5 mm (5.23 ± 1.45 mm) than ≥ 5 mm (2.62 ± 1.15 mm) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Greater gains were observed in first molars (3.70 ± 1.72). Implant brand and graft type did not influence BHG. The survival rate of the implants reached 97% after 6 months of osseointegration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>OD with simultaneous implant placement was effective for SFE, applying a variety of implant brands and type of bone substitute, resulting in clinically relevant BHG, adequate AIL, and low complication rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine the bone height gain (BHG) achieved after sinus floor elevation (SFE) with osseodensification (OD).
Materials and Methods
Patients from an implantology learning center presenting one missing teeth in the posterior maxilla and insufficient residual bone height (RBH) were included. SFE with simultaneous implant placement was performed using Densah drills. Demineralized bovine bone mineral, hydroxyapatite+β-TCP, calcium phosphosilicate, and autologous leukoplakelet fibrin were used as graft biomaterials. BHG was obtained by subtracting the implant length from the initial bone height.
Results
Sinus membrane perforation occurred in 4.8% of 144 cases. One hundred and thirty-seven patients were analyzed for BHG. RBH equaled 5.4 ± 1.8 mm, with 42 (30.7%) cases having < 5 mm. The average implant length (AIL) was 8.8 ± 1.1 mm, resulting in a mean BHG of 3.4 ± 1.7 mm. BHG was significantly higher in cases with RBH < 5 mm (5.23 ± 1.45 mm) than ≥ 5 mm (2.62 ± 1.15 mm) (p < 0.001). Greater gains were observed in first molars (3.70 ± 1.72). Implant brand and graft type did not influence BHG. The survival rate of the implants reached 97% after 6 months of osseointegration.
Conclusions
OD with simultaneous implant placement was effective for SFE, applying a variety of implant brands and type of bone substitute, resulting in clinically relevant BHG, adequate AIL, and low complication rates.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.