Measures of Psychological Mindedness: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties

IF 3.2 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-03-23 DOI:10.1002/cpp.70064

Joshua Eli Thompson, Gillian Haddock, Katherine Berry

{"title":"Measures of Psychological Mindedness: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties","authors":"Joshua Eli Thompson, Gillian Haddock, Katherine Berry","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Psychological mindedness has been positively associated with psychological wellbeing and positive outcomes in psychological therapy. Valid and reliable measures of psychological mindedness are needed for accurate measurement of the construct. This paper is the first to provide a comprehensive review of existing measures of psychological mindedness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The review protocol was pre-registered and systematic with methods reported according to PRISMA criteria. The quality of studies reporting on psychometric properties of measurement tools was evaluated against the COSMIN criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three studies relating to six measures of psychological mindedness were included in the review. No measure demonstrated sufficient evidence when evaluated against all COSMIN measurement criteria. However, the Balanced Index of Psychological Mindedness (BIPM) demonstrated the most robust psychometric properties with sufficient evidence of structural validity and internal consistency demonstrated through studies of high quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Whilst the BIPM demonstrated the most robust measurement properties, further research is needed in relation to its content validity, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness. The BIPM also does not incorporate ‘other-oriented’ psychological mindedness. Alternative measures such as the PMS and PMAP are available to measure psychological mindedness towards others but have less sufficient evidence of psychometric rigour.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Psychological mindedness has been positively associated with psychological wellbeing and positive outcomes in psychological therapy. Valid and reliable measures of psychological mindedness are needed for accurate measurement of the construct. This paper is the first to provide a comprehensive review of existing measures of psychological mindedness.

Methods

The review protocol was pre-registered and systematic with methods reported according to PRISMA criteria. The quality of studies reporting on psychometric properties of measurement tools was evaluated against the COSMIN criteria.

Results

Twenty-three studies relating to six measures of psychological mindedness were included in the review. No measure demonstrated sufficient evidence when evaluated against all COSMIN measurement criteria. However, the Balanced Index of Psychological Mindedness (BIPM) demonstrated the most robust psychometric properties with sufficient evidence of structural validity and internal consistency demonstrated through studies of high quality.

Conclusions

Whilst the BIPM demonstrated the most robust measurement properties, further research is needed in relation to its content validity, cross-cultural validity, and responsiveness. The BIPM also does not incorporate ‘other-oriented’ psychological mindedness. Alternative measures such as the PMS and PMAP are available to measure psychological mindedness towards others but have less sufficient evidence of psychometric rigour.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

心理意识的测量：心理测量特性的系统回顾

目的心理意识与心理健康和心理治疗的积极结果呈正相关。为了准确地测量心理结构，需要有效和可靠的心理意识测量。这篇论文是第一个对现有的心理意识测量方法进行全面回顾的论文。方法评价方案按照PRISMA标准进行预注册和系统化。根据COSMIN标准对报告测量工具心理测量特性的研究质量进行评估。结果共纳入23项研究，涉及6项心理倾向测量。在对所有COSMIN测量标准进行评估时，没有任何测量显示出足够的证据。然而，心理意识平衡指数（BIPM）表现出最稳健的心理测量特性，并通过高质量的研究证明了其结构效度和内部一致性。结论：虽然BIPM显示了最稳健的测量特性，但需要进一步研究其内容效度、跨文化效度和响应性。BIPM也不包括“他人导向”的心理思维。诸如PMS和PMAP之类的替代测量方法可用于测量对他人的心理关注，但没有足够的证据表明心理测量的严谨性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

6.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

106

期刊介绍： Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.