Brief Report: Exploring Perceived Stigma From Healthcare Professionals in an Adult Sample With Eating Disorders

Marta Marlais, Maria Livanou
{"title":"Brief Report: Exploring Perceived Stigma From Healthcare Professionals in an Adult Sample With Eating Disorders","authors":"Marta Marlais,&nbsp;Maria Livanou","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to develop and test a novel Perceived Stigma from Healthcare Professional's self-report questionnaire in a sample of female and male young adults with eating disorders (EDs). An online cross-sectional self-report study was conducted, recruiting a community and clinical sample of 18 to 35-year-olds diagnosed with or self-identifying with an ED (<i>N</i> = 140). The questionnaire utilised the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 to measure ED severity. Those who sought professional help for their ED proceeded to answer the novel Perceived Stigma from Healthcare Professionals questionnaire (<i>N</i> = 42). There was a large range of total perceived stigma scores but, volitional stigma and weight discrimination were the most frequently perceived stigmatising views. A Pearson's correlation illustrated that greater perceived stigma from healthcare professionals was moderately associated with greater ED severity, <i>r</i>(4) = 0.49. <i>p</i> = 0.001. The results indicate heterogeneity of experiences of stigma but, provide preliminary evidence that volitional stigma and weight discrimination may reflect common experiences. Greater stigma from healthcare professionals might be linked to worse outcomes for those with EDs. The findings underscore the importance of further exploration into perceived stigma from healthcare professionals and ED outcomes, using validated questionnaires and larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.70013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and test a novel Perceived Stigma from Healthcare Professional's self-report questionnaire in a sample of female and male young adults with eating disorders (EDs). An online cross-sectional self-report study was conducted, recruiting a community and clinical sample of 18 to 35-year-olds diagnosed with or self-identifying with an ED (N = 140). The questionnaire utilised the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 to measure ED severity. Those who sought professional help for their ED proceeded to answer the novel Perceived Stigma from Healthcare Professionals questionnaire (N = 42). There was a large range of total perceived stigma scores but, volitional stigma and weight discrimination were the most frequently perceived stigmatising views. A Pearson's correlation illustrated that greater perceived stigma from healthcare professionals was moderately associated with greater ED severity, r(4) = 0.49. p = 0.001. The results indicate heterogeneity of experiences of stigma but, provide preliminary evidence that volitional stigma and weight discrimination may reflect common experiences. Greater stigma from healthcare professionals might be linked to worse outcomes for those with EDs. The findings underscore the importance of further exploration into perceived stigma from healthcare professionals and ED outcomes, using validated questionnaires and larger samples.

Abstract Image

简短的报告:探索从医疗保健专业人员感知耻辱与饮食失调的成人样本
本研究的目的是开发和测试一种新的来自医疗保健专业人员自我报告问卷的污名感,并以患有饮食失调症(EDs)的年轻男女为样本。进行了一项在线横断面自我报告研究,招募了18至35岁的社区和临床样本,这些样本被诊断为ED或自认为患有ED (N = 140)。问卷采用饮食失调量表-3来衡量ED的严重程度。那些寻求专业帮助的ED患者继续回答来自医疗保健专业人员的新型感知耻辱问卷(N = 42)。总的感知耻辱得分范围很大,但意志耻辱和体重歧视是最常见的感知耻辱观点。Pearson相关分析表明,来自医疗保健专业人员的耻辱感越强,ED严重程度越高,相关性越高,r(4) = 0.49。p = 0.001。结果显示了柱头经历的异质性,但提供了初步证据,表明意志柱头和体重歧视可能反映了共同的经历。来自医疗专业人员的更大的耻辱可能与急诊科患者的更糟糕的结果有关。研究结果强调了进一步探索医疗保健专业人员的耻辱感和ED结果的重要性,使用有效的问卷调查和更大的样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信