Numerical Assessment of the Efficiency of a New Minimally Invasive Probe for the Isolation of Circulating Tumor Cells

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Felix Hehnen, Henri Wolff, Sophia Krakowski, Gabi Bondzio, Michael Lommel, Ulrich Kertzscher, Paul Friedrich Geus
{"title":"Numerical Assessment of the Efficiency of a New Minimally Invasive Probe for the Isolation of Circulating Tumor Cells","authors":"Felix Hehnen,&nbsp;Henri Wolff,&nbsp;Sophia Krakowski,&nbsp;Gabi Bondzio,&nbsp;Michael Lommel,&nbsp;Ulrich Kertzscher,&nbsp;Paul Friedrich Geus","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Liquid biopsy, particularly the isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood, is a promising approach in the fight against cancer. However, the main reason why CTCs are hardly used as biomarkers in the clinic is their complicated isolation from the patient's blood. Existing ex vivo systems use a small volume of blood and can therefore only isolate very few CTCs. To overcome this problem and increase the number of isolated CTCs, a new in vivo method—the BMProbe was introduced, which can isolate CTCs directly from the patient's bloodstream. This study investigates the efficiency of the BMProbe by using Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations to evaluate parameters influencing the attachment probability of CTCs to the probe surface. The analyzed parameters include screened blood volume, residence time, and wall normal rate. Additionally, the impact of probe geometry, vein diameter, and blood flow velocity on probe efficiency was examined. The numerical data suggest that the geometry has a strong influence on cell binding efficiency. Increasing the number of windings from 4 to 32 improves the transport of cells to the surface (negative wall normal rate) from 0 to −29 [mm<sup>2</sup>/s] and the screened blood volume by 138% but decreases the residence time of particles in the close vicinity of the probe by 77%. When compared to experimental data, the screened blood volume and the wall normal rate indicate cell attachment very well, whereas the residence time does not show a significant impact on the attachment of cells. For the 32-windings BMProbe, the screened blood volume is determined to be 130–313 mL, depending on the vein diameter, which is a multiple of the volume achieved by common CTC isolation techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liquid biopsy, particularly the isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood, is a promising approach in the fight against cancer. However, the main reason why CTCs are hardly used as biomarkers in the clinic is their complicated isolation from the patient's blood. Existing ex vivo systems use a small volume of blood and can therefore only isolate very few CTCs. To overcome this problem and increase the number of isolated CTCs, a new in vivo method—the BMProbe was introduced, which can isolate CTCs directly from the patient's bloodstream. This study investigates the efficiency of the BMProbe by using Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations to evaluate parameters influencing the attachment probability of CTCs to the probe surface. The analyzed parameters include screened blood volume, residence time, and wall normal rate. Additionally, the impact of probe geometry, vein diameter, and blood flow velocity on probe efficiency was examined. The numerical data suggest that the geometry has a strong influence on cell binding efficiency. Increasing the number of windings from 4 to 32 improves the transport of cells to the surface (negative wall normal rate) from 0 to −29 [mm2/s] and the screened blood volume by 138% but decreases the residence time of particles in the close vicinity of the probe by 77%. When compared to experimental data, the screened blood volume and the wall normal rate indicate cell attachment very well, whereas the residence time does not show a significant impact on the attachment of cells. For the 32-windings BMProbe, the screened blood volume is determined to be 130–313 mL, depending on the vein diameter, which is a multiple of the volume achieved by common CTC isolation techniques.

Abstract Image

对用于分离循环肿瘤细胞的新型微创探针效率的数值评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信