A First Look at the Global Climatology of Low-Level Clouds in Storm Resolving Models

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jakub L. Nowak, Ian C. D. V. Dragaud, Junhong Lee, Piotr Dziekan, Juan Pedro Mellado, Bjorn Stevens
{"title":"A First Look at the Global Climatology of Low-Level Clouds in Storm Resolving Models","authors":"Jakub L. Nowak,&nbsp;Ian C. D. V. Dragaud,&nbsp;Junhong Lee,&nbsp;Piotr Dziekan,&nbsp;Juan Pedro Mellado,&nbsp;Bjorn Stevens","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The representation of subtropical stratocumulus and trade-wind cumulus clouds by preliminary versions of Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) and ICON km-scale global coupled climate models is explored. These models differ profoundly in their strategy to represent subgrid-scale processes. The IFS employs complex parameterizations, including eddy-diffusivity mass-flux and convection schemes. ICON applies a minimal set of paramaterizations, including the Smagorinsky-Lilly closure. Five-year simulations are performed and evaluated for their representation of cloud albedo, its variability with environmental parameters and the vertical structure of the atmospheric boundary layer in eight regions: four corresponding to canonical Atlantic and Pacific stratocumulus and four in their downstream trades. For stratocumulus, both models capture the albedo's mean, annual cycle, and its relationship with the parameters relevant for low cloudiness, including lower tropospheric stability. They simulate an expected thermodynamic vertical structure of a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. ICON largely exhibits a lower cloud base and inversion height than IFS. We speculate the disagreement can be attributed to the contrasting treatment of subgrid mixing and cloud top entrainment. In the case of trade-wind cumulus, both models well differentiate the cloud amount, the character of annual cycles and parameter correlations, and the vertical structure from the upstream stratocumulus. The annual cycles and parameter correlations reflect the dry and wet periods. Both models overestimate mean albedo and underestimate the strength of trade-wind inversion. With an additional ICON run, we demonstrate the strong sensitivity of stratocumulus and the weaker response of trade-wind cumulus to the treatment of subgrid mixing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004340","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004340","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The representation of subtropical stratocumulus and trade-wind cumulus clouds by preliminary versions of Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) and ICON km-scale global coupled climate models is explored. These models differ profoundly in their strategy to represent subgrid-scale processes. The IFS employs complex parameterizations, including eddy-diffusivity mass-flux and convection schemes. ICON applies a minimal set of paramaterizations, including the Smagorinsky-Lilly closure. Five-year simulations are performed and evaluated for their representation of cloud albedo, its variability with environmental parameters and the vertical structure of the atmospheric boundary layer in eight regions: four corresponding to canonical Atlantic and Pacific stratocumulus and four in their downstream trades. For stratocumulus, both models capture the albedo's mean, annual cycle, and its relationship with the parameters relevant for low cloudiness, including lower tropospheric stability. They simulate an expected thermodynamic vertical structure of a stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. ICON largely exhibits a lower cloud base and inversion height than IFS. We speculate the disagreement can be attributed to the contrasting treatment of subgrid mixing and cloud top entrainment. In the case of trade-wind cumulus, both models well differentiate the cloud amount, the character of annual cycles and parameter correlations, and the vertical structure from the upstream stratocumulus. The annual cycles and parameter correlations reflect the dry and wet periods. Both models overestimate mean albedo and underestimate the strength of trade-wind inversion. With an additional ICON run, we demonstrate the strong sensitivity of stratocumulus and the weaker response of trade-wind cumulus to the treatment of subgrid mixing.

Abstract Image

风暴解析模式中低空云层的全球气候学初探
探讨了综合预报系统(IFS)和 ICON 千米尺度全球耦合气候模式初步版本对副热带层积云和信风积云的表示。这些模式在表现亚网格尺度过程的策略上有很大不同。IFS 采用了复杂的参数化方法,包括涡度扩散质量流和对流方案。ICON 采用了最小化的参数设置,包括 Smagorinsky-Lilly 闭合。对八个区域的云反照率、云反照率随环境参数的变化以及大气边界层的垂直结构进行了为期五年的模拟和评估:四个区域对应典型的大西洋和太平洋层积云,四个区域对应其下游行业。对于层积云,两个模式都捕捉到了反照率的平均值、年周期及其与低云度相关参数的关系,包括对流层低层的稳定性。它们模拟了层积云顶边界层的预期热力学垂直结构。ICON 在很大程度上表现出比 IFS 更低的云基和反转高度。我们推测这种分歧可归因于对亚网格混合和云顶夹带的不同处理。对于信风积云,两种模式都能很好地区分云量、年周期和参数相关性的特征以及上游层积云的垂直结构。年周期和参数相关性反映了干燥和潮湿时期。两种模式都高估了平均反照率,低估了信风反转的强度。通过额外的 ICON 运行,我们证明了层积云对亚网格混合处理的强烈敏感性和信风积云对亚网格混合处理的较弱响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信