The Development and Psychometric Validation of Culture of Patient Safety Scale Under Rasch Objective Measurement Theory

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Odunayo Kolawole Omolade, John Stephenson
{"title":"The Development and Psychometric Validation of Culture of Patient Safety Scale Under Rasch Objective Measurement Theory","authors":"Odunayo Kolawole Omolade,&nbsp;John Stephenson","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/9997682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Assessing the culture of patient safety in healthcare settings is pivotal for continuously reinforcing effective, safe and quality patient care. However, most of the rating scales lack evidence of objective validation of the measuring instruments.</p>\n <p><b>Aim:</b> To determine the psychometric properties of culture of patient safety scale under the Rasch objective measurement theory.</p>\n <p><b>Method:</b> The validation of the culture of safety scale was underpinned by the four stages of rating scale development in Rasch objective measurement theory. The first stage involved literature review to shortlist items considered theoretically relevant to culture of patient safety in hospital settings. In the second stage, a panel of academic and practitioners individually reviewed the selected items to give external face validity based on professional experiences. In the third stage, 967 participants from public maternity settings in Nigeria voluntarily accessed the nine items forming the culture of patient safety scale online over 8-week period. Ethical approval was given by the nurses’ association and University of Huddersfield. Subsequently, all the data were exported to SPSS and Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0 for evaluation of the psychometric assumptions. Essential psychometric properties evaluated are dimensionality, category functioning, item difficulty/agreeability, local independence, reliability and item validity. In the fourth stage, problematic items were identified and moderated based on the outcome of the measurement assumptions. Consequently, final decisions made included retention, modification or expulsion of items, making no meaningful contribution to the variable measurement.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion and Implication:</b> The culture of safety scale has excellent psychometric properties and therefore recommended for use among practitioners and researchers. No direct contribution from the public or patients required in this study.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/9997682","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/9997682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Assessing the culture of patient safety in healthcare settings is pivotal for continuously reinforcing effective, safe and quality patient care. However, most of the rating scales lack evidence of objective validation of the measuring instruments.

Aim: To determine the psychometric properties of culture of patient safety scale under the Rasch objective measurement theory.

Method: The validation of the culture of safety scale was underpinned by the four stages of rating scale development in Rasch objective measurement theory. The first stage involved literature review to shortlist items considered theoretically relevant to culture of patient safety in hospital settings. In the second stage, a panel of academic and practitioners individually reviewed the selected items to give external face validity based on professional experiences. In the third stage, 967 participants from public maternity settings in Nigeria voluntarily accessed the nine items forming the culture of patient safety scale online over 8-week period. Ethical approval was given by the nurses’ association and University of Huddersfield. Subsequently, all the data were exported to SPSS and Winsteps Version 5.0.0.0 for evaluation of the psychometric assumptions. Essential psychometric properties evaluated are dimensionality, category functioning, item difficulty/agreeability, local independence, reliability and item validity. In the fourth stage, problematic items were identified and moderated based on the outcome of the measurement assumptions. Consequently, final decisions made included retention, modification or expulsion of items, making no meaningful contribution to the variable measurement.

Conclusion and Implication: The culture of safety scale has excellent psychometric properties and therefore recommended for use among practitioners and researchers. No direct contribution from the public or patients required in this study.

Abstract Image

拉施客观测量理论下的患者安全文化量表的开发与心理测量学验证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信