SRAD: Autonomous Decision-Making Method for UAV Based on Safety Reinforcement Learning

IF 3 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Expert Systems Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1111/exsy.70004
Wenwen Xiao, Xiangfeng Luo, Shaorong Xie
{"title":"SRAD: Autonomous Decision-Making Method for UAV Based on Safety Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Wenwen Xiao,&nbsp;Xiangfeng Luo,&nbsp;Shaorong Xie","doi":"10.1111/exsy.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly vital across numerous sectors, from logistics and rescue operations to military endeavours and beyond. However, ensuring safety in the decision-making processes surrounding UAV operations in real-world settings has become an urgent and complex challenge. At present, the main methods to minimise the risk of drone decision-making include utilising pre-established control rules, expert prior knowledge and regularisation constraints. However, these methodologies require UAVs to meet demanding prerequisites, including the acquisition of extensive decision-making experience and the establishment of comprehensive rules. Regrettably, these strict requirements often lead to frequent UAV crashes in uncertain environments and subsequent mission failures. In order to tackle these issues, we propose a self-decision-making method for quadcopter UAVs based on safe reinforcement learning. Our method utilises a multilevel cascading feature semantic space for reinforcement learning, integrating depth images, greyscale images, semantic segmentation images and object detection results as inputs. This approach aims to facilitate safe autonomous learning. Moreover, we integrate real offline labelled data to enhance the safety policy. Depending on the varying levels of risk encountered during the UAV's decision-making process, we dynamically select different safety policies. Through this iterative process, the UAV progressively eliminates extreme actions and reverts to the UAV learning policy module. Experimental results indicate that our method not only ensures safe decision-making for UAVs in uncertain environments but also exhibits superior safety decision-making efficacy compared to certain baseline methods.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are increasingly vital across numerous sectors, from logistics and rescue operations to military endeavours and beyond. However, ensuring safety in the decision-making processes surrounding UAV operations in real-world settings has become an urgent and complex challenge. At present, the main methods to minimise the risk of drone decision-making include utilising pre-established control rules, expert prior knowledge and regularisation constraints. However, these methodologies require UAVs to meet demanding prerequisites, including the acquisition of extensive decision-making experience and the establishment of comprehensive rules. Regrettably, these strict requirements often lead to frequent UAV crashes in uncertain environments and subsequent mission failures. In order to tackle these issues, we propose a self-decision-making method for quadcopter UAVs based on safe reinforcement learning. Our method utilises a multilevel cascading feature semantic space for reinforcement learning, integrating depth images, greyscale images, semantic segmentation images and object detection results as inputs. This approach aims to facilitate safe autonomous learning. Moreover, we integrate real offline labelled data to enhance the safety policy. Depending on the varying levels of risk encountered during the UAV's decision-making process, we dynamically select different safety policies. Through this iterative process, the UAV progressively eliminates extreme actions and reverts to the UAV learning policy module. Experimental results indicate that our method not only ensures safe decision-making for UAVs in uncertain environments but also exhibits superior safety decision-making efficacy compared to certain baseline methods.

基于安全强化学习的无人机自主决策方法
无人驾驶飞行器(uav)在从后勤和救援行动到军事行动等众多领域越来越重要。然而,确保在现实环境中围绕无人机操作的决策过程中的安全已成为一项紧迫而复杂的挑战。目前,最小化无人机决策风险的主要方法包括利用预先建立的控制规则、专家先验知识和正则化约束。然而,这些方法要求无人机满足苛刻的先决条件,包括获得广泛的决策经验和建立全面的规则。遗憾的是,这些严格的要求经常导致无人机在不确定环境中频繁坠毁和随后的任务失败。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一种基于安全强化学习的四旋翼无人机自决策方法。我们的方法利用多层级联特征语义空间进行强化学习,将深度图像、灰度图像、语义分割图像和目标检测结果作为输入。这种方法旨在促进安全的自主学习。此外,我们整合了真实的离线标签数据,以增强安全策略。根据无人机决策过程中遇到的不同风险级别,动态选择不同的安全策略。通过这个迭代过程,无人机逐步消除极端行为,并回归到无人机学习策略模块。实验结果表明,该方法不仅保证了无人机在不确定环境下的安全决策,而且与某些基线方法相比,具有优越的安全决策效能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信