Machine Learning and Weighted Gene Coexpression Network–Based Identification of Biomarkers Predicting Immune Profiling and Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Tian Zhang, Han Zhou
{"title":"Machine Learning and Weighted Gene Coexpression Network–Based Identification of Biomarkers Predicting Immune Profiling and Drug Resistance in Lung Adenocarcinoma","authors":"Tian Zhang,&nbsp;Han Zhou","doi":"10.1155/ijog/9923294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> The prognosis for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is poor, and the recurrence rate is high. Thus, to evaluate patients’ prognoses and direct therapy choices, new prognostic markers are desperately needed.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> First, gene modules associated with LUAD were identified by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis. The expression profiles obtained were intersected with the differential expressed genes taken between LUAD samples and paracancerous samples. Afterward, stepwise regression analysis and the LASSO were used to compress the genes further, and a risk model was created. Furthermore, a nomogram based on risk scores and clinical features was created to validate the model. After that, the distinctions between the pertinent biological processes and signaling pathways among the various subgroups were investigated. Additionally, drug sensitivity testing, immunotherapy, immune infiltration analysis, and enrichment analysis were carried out. Finally, the biological role of <i>ANLN</i> in LUAD was explored by qPCR, cell scratch assay, and transwell.</p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 257 intersected genes were obtained by taking the intersection of the differential genes between 2866 LUAD samples and paraneoplastic samples with the module genes after we screened two particular modules that had the strongest link with LUAD by WGCNA. <i>ANLN</i>, <i>CASS4</i>, and <i>NMUR1</i> were found to be distinctive genes for the development of risk models after the intersecting genes were screened to find 176 genes linked to the prognosis for LUAD. Based on risk assessments, high- and low-risk groups of LUAD patients were divided. Low-risk patients exhibited a significantly higher overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group. Expression of model genes correlates with infiltration of the vast majority of immune cells. Significant differences in the biological pathways, immune microenvironment, and abundance of immune cell infiltration were found between the two groups. The drug sensitivity study showed that patients in the high-risk group had higher IC<sub>50</sub> values for BMS-754807_2171 and Doramapimod_10424. Finally, in vitro experiments demonstrated that knocking down <i>ANLN</i> noticeably inhibited the viability, migration, and invasion of A549 cells.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study may provide a theoretical reference for future exploration of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for LUAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":55239,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijog/9923294","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and Functional Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijog/9923294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognosis for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is poor, and the recurrence rate is high. Thus, to evaluate patients’ prognoses and direct therapy choices, new prognostic markers are desperately needed.

Methods: First, gene modules associated with LUAD were identified by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) analysis. The expression profiles obtained were intersected with the differential expressed genes taken between LUAD samples and paracancerous samples. Afterward, stepwise regression analysis and the LASSO were used to compress the genes further, and a risk model was created. Furthermore, a nomogram based on risk scores and clinical features was created to validate the model. After that, the distinctions between the pertinent biological processes and signaling pathways among the various subgroups were investigated. Additionally, drug sensitivity testing, immunotherapy, immune infiltration analysis, and enrichment analysis were carried out. Finally, the biological role of ANLN in LUAD was explored by qPCR, cell scratch assay, and transwell.

Results: A total of 257 intersected genes were obtained by taking the intersection of the differential genes between 2866 LUAD samples and paraneoplastic samples with the module genes after we screened two particular modules that had the strongest link with LUAD by WGCNA. ANLN, CASS4, and NMUR1 were found to be distinctive genes for the development of risk models after the intersecting genes were screened to find 176 genes linked to the prognosis for LUAD. Based on risk assessments, high- and low-risk groups of LUAD patients were divided. Low-risk patients exhibited a significantly higher overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group. Expression of model genes correlates with infiltration of the vast majority of immune cells. Significant differences in the biological pathways, immune microenvironment, and abundance of immune cell infiltration were found between the two groups. The drug sensitivity study showed that patients in the high-risk group had higher IC50 values for BMS-754807_2171 and Doramapimod_10424. Finally, in vitro experiments demonstrated that knocking down ANLN noticeably inhibited the viability, migration, and invasion of A549 cells.

Conclusion: This study may provide a theoretical reference for future exploration of potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for LUAD.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative and Functional Genomics
Comparative and Functional Genomics 生物-生化与分子生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信