Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies

Sisi Lin, Kui Liu, Reynald Lemke
{"title":"Assessing cropping system effects on carbon footprint on the Canadian prairies","authors":"Sisi Lin,&nbsp;Kui Liu,&nbsp;Reynald Lemke","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Crop rotations are considered a promising strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and enhancing soil organic matter in agricultural land. However, studies often focused solely on either GHG emissions or soil organic carbon (SOC) changes, rather than integrating both indicators. We conducted a 4-year (2018–2021) crop rotation study to examine effects of six rotation systems in three ecoregions (sub-humid, sub-semiarid, and semiarid) on GHG emissions, SOC changes, and C footprints in Saskatchewan, Canada. The six rotation systems include (i) control, (ii) intensified, (iii) diversified, (iv) market-driven, (v) high-risk, and (vi) soil-health cropping system. GHG emissions were estimated using the Holos model, and SOC changes were estimated using the Campbell model, and C footprints were calculated as the difference between GHG emissions and SOC changes. The 4-year cumulative GHG emissions, expressed as CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e), were highest in the sub-humid ecoregion due to higher background SOC levels, nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs, and precipitation. The diversified and soil-health systems reduced GHG emissions by reduced N fertilizer inputs. Carbon footprints revealed net CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions for the market-driven system but net CO<sub>2</sub>e withdrawals for the soil-health and diversified systems. The results indicated that the diversified systems significantly mitigated GHG emissions, increased soil C stocks, and withdrew CO<sub>2</sub>e.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crop rotations are considered a promising strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and enhancing soil organic matter in agricultural land. However, studies often focused solely on either GHG emissions or soil organic carbon (SOC) changes, rather than integrating both indicators. We conducted a 4-year (2018–2021) crop rotation study to examine effects of six rotation systems in three ecoregions (sub-humid, sub-semiarid, and semiarid) on GHG emissions, SOC changes, and C footprints in Saskatchewan, Canada. The six rotation systems include (i) control, (ii) intensified, (iii) diversified, (iv) market-driven, (v) high-risk, and (vi) soil-health cropping system. GHG emissions were estimated using the Holos model, and SOC changes were estimated using the Campbell model, and C footprints were calculated as the difference between GHG emissions and SOC changes. The 4-year cumulative GHG emissions, expressed as CO2 equivalent (CO2e), were highest in the sub-humid ecoregion due to higher background SOC levels, nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs, and precipitation. The diversified and soil-health systems reduced GHG emissions by reduced N fertilizer inputs. Carbon footprints revealed net CO2e emissions for the market-driven system but net CO2e withdrawals for the soil-health and diversified systems. The results indicated that the diversified systems significantly mitigated GHG emissions, increased soil C stocks, and withdrew CO2e.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估种植制度对加拿大草原碳足迹的影响
作物轮作被认为是减少温室气体排放和增加农田土壤有机质的一种有前途的策略。然而,研究往往只关注温室气体排放或土壤有机碳(SOC)变化,而不是将两者结合起来。我们进行了一项为期4年(2018-2021)的作物轮作研究,研究了加拿大萨斯喀彻温省3个生态区(半湿润、半干旱和半干旱)6种轮作制度对温室气体排放、有机碳变化和碳足迹的影响。这六种轮作制度包括(i)控制、(ii)强化、(iii)多样化、(iv)市场驱动、(v)高风险和(vi)土壤健康耕作制度。利用Holos模型估算温室气体排放,利用Campbell模型估算有机碳变化,并计算碳足迹作为温室气体排放与有机碳变化之差。以CO2当量(CO2e)表示的4年累积温室气体排放量在半湿润生态区最高,这是由于较高的背景有机碳水平、氮肥投入和降水。多样化和土壤健康系统通过减少氮肥投入减少了温室气体排放。碳足迹揭示了市场驱动系统的二氧化碳当量净排放量,但土壤健康和多样化系统的二氧化碳当量净提取。结果表明,不同的生态系统对温室气体排放有显著的缓解作用,增加了土壤C储量,并吸收了CO2e。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信