{"title":"A presentation of the torus-equivariant quantum \n \n K\n $K$\n -theory ring of flag manifolds of type \n \n A\n $A$\n , Part I: The defining ideal","authors":"Toshiaki Maeno, Satoshi Naito, Daisuke Sagaki","doi":"10.1112/jlms.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We give a presentation of the torus-equivariant (small) quantum <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <annotation>$K$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-theory ring of flag manifolds of type <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <annotation>$A$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, as the quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This result is the torus-equivariant version of our previous one, which gives a presentation of the nonequivariant quantum <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <annotation>$K$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-theory ring of flag manifolds of type <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <annotation>$A$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. However, the method of proof for the torus-equivariant one is entirely different from that for the nonequivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$Q = 0$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> limit, and uses Nakayama-type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to the nonequivariant case in which we used the Chevalley formula, we make use of the inverse Chevalley formula for the torus-equivariant <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>K</mi>\n <annotation>$K$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>-group of semi-infinite flag manifolds to obtain relations that yield our presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","volume":"111 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the London Mathematical Society-Second Series","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/jlms.70095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We give a presentation of the torus-equivariant (small) quantum -theory ring of flag manifolds of type , as the quotient of a polynomial ring by an explicit ideal. This result is the torus-equivariant version of our previous one, which gives a presentation of the nonequivariant quantum -theory ring of flag manifolds of type . However, the method of proof for the torus-equivariant one is entirely different from that for the nonequivariant one; our proof is based on the result in the limit, and uses Nakayama-type arguments to upgrade it to the quantum situation. Also, in contrast to the nonequivariant case in which we used the Chevalley formula, we make use of the inverse Chevalley formula for the torus-equivariant -group of semi-infinite flag manifolds to obtain relations that yield our presentation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the London Mathematical Society has been publishing leading research in a broad range of mathematical subject areas since 1926. The Journal welcomes papers on subjects of general interest that represent a significant advance in mathematical knowledge, as well as submissions that are deemed to stimulate new interest and research activity.