Mid-season pest management implications for protecting soybean seed quality in North Carolina

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
K. O'Reilly, R. A. Vann, G. D. Collins, L. R. Lux, D. R Stokes, D. D. Reisig
{"title":"Mid-season pest management implications for protecting soybean seed quality in North Carolina","authors":"K. O'Reilly,&nbsp;R. A. Vann,&nbsp;G. D. Collins,&nbsp;L. R. Lux,&nbsp;D. R Stokes,&nbsp;D. D. Reisig","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soybean producers in North Carolina have shifted from later to early-maturing varieties (MG II-IV) to increase yield. This shift has coincided with more frequent seed damage and purple seed stain, sometimes resulting in dockage at the elevator. Weather is a major driving factor in seed quality issues, but management strategies may play a role to minimize these seed quality issues; these have not been investigated in North Carolina. To better understand the impact of pest management on seed quality, field trials were conducted over two growing seasons (2021–2022) in three environments across North Carolina. Soybean yield, seed damage, purple seed stain, protein, and oil were collected. Moreover, non-treated controls were scouted at R3 and R5 for each planting date and maturity group combination to determine pest dynamics at each location. While fungicide applications improved yield, pesticide applications did not significantly protect seed quality compared to the untreated control. Continuous scouting and as needed pesticide application can help producers improve soybean yield and protect seed quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70033","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soybean producers in North Carolina have shifted from later to early-maturing varieties (MG II-IV) to increase yield. This shift has coincided with more frequent seed damage and purple seed stain, sometimes resulting in dockage at the elevator. Weather is a major driving factor in seed quality issues, but management strategies may play a role to minimize these seed quality issues; these have not been investigated in North Carolina. To better understand the impact of pest management on seed quality, field trials were conducted over two growing seasons (2021–2022) in three environments across North Carolina. Soybean yield, seed damage, purple seed stain, protein, and oil were collected. Moreover, non-treated controls were scouted at R3 and R5 for each planting date and maturity group combination to determine pest dynamics at each location. While fungicide applications improved yield, pesticide applications did not significantly protect seed quality compared to the untreated control. Continuous scouting and as needed pesticide application can help producers improve soybean yield and protect seed quality.

Abstract Image

季中害虫管理对保护北卡罗来纳州大豆种子质量的影响
北卡罗莱纳的大豆生产者已经从后期转向早熟品种(MG II-IV)以提高产量。这一转变与更频繁的种子损坏和紫色种子污渍同时发生,有时会导致电梯滞留。天气是种子质量问题的主要驱动因素,但管理策略可以发挥作用,尽量减少这些种子质量问题;这些还没有在北卡罗来纳州进行过调查。为了更好地了解害虫管理对种子质量的影响,在北卡罗来纳州的三个环境中进行了两个生长季节(2021-2022)的田间试验。收集大豆产量、籽粒损伤、紫斑、蛋白、油脂等指标。此外,在R3和R5对每个种植日期和成熟度组组合进行未处理的对照,以确定每个地点的害虫动态。虽然施用杀菌剂提高了产量,但与未经处理的对照相比,施用农药对种子质量的保护作用并不显著。持续侦察和按需施用农药可以帮助生产者提高大豆产量和保护种子质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信