Accounting for informalization in Africa's extractive industry: Evidence from Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector during the colonial period

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
James Tuffour, Swetketu Patnaik, Maureen Ayikoru
{"title":"Accounting for informalization in Africa's extractive industry: Evidence from Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector during the colonial period","authors":"James Tuffour,&nbsp;Swetketu Patnaik,&nbsp;Maureen Ayikoru","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we draw on the accountability and institutional theories to explicate the informalized state of Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector as an exemplar of informalization of the extractive industry in Africa during the colonial period. We present a critical and historical perspective on the role of colonial subjugation that took the form of discriminatory policies and lack of accountability, in laying the foundations for the current challenges of continuous informalization of the indigenous gold mining sector and its implications on livelihoods, the economy and the environment in Ghana. We analyzed archival data on the mining industry in Ghana, consisting of official correspondences between colonial bureaucrats in Britain and Ghana, as well as colonial policies on mining, interpreted through the lenses of institutional theory. Specifically, we used records comprising letters, mineral policies, mineral output, and labor relations in the Gold Coast during the colonial period as well as minutes of meetings held by those governing mining enterprises that operated in Ghana before 1957. We also drew on periodic reports of the Ghana Chamber of Mines and their member enterprises, Government of Ghana white papers, parliamentary records among others. We found that the colonial authority, as the new institutional power with vested interest in the extractive industry, adopted discriminatory policies that banned small-scale gold mining by indigenous population in Ghana, marginalizing the sector's operation to the advantage of foreign large-scale gold miners. We demonstrate that the control of mineral resources by the colonial authority under new ownership structures disenfranchised the indigenous population and their right to the mineral resources of the Gold Coast. We argue that this institutionalized discriminatory policy, and the resulting lack of accountability is largely responsible for the ongoing informalization of Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector. This paper contributes to the corpus of critical and historical scholarship that investigates the role of racialization and accountability during colonial period, but with notable distinction that departs from specific professional or disciplinary perspectives. Instead, it focuses on the colonial subjugation and exploitation of the small-scale gold mining sector and its ongoing informalization that traces its roots to the era of British colonial rule in Ghana. It reiterates the need for accountability for these historical inequalities affecting the small-scale mining operators, to facilitate the sector's formalization and to effectively control and manage the myriads of negative impacts associated with it.</p>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"42 1","pages":"144-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjas.1762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.1762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we draw on the accountability and institutional theories to explicate the informalized state of Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector as an exemplar of informalization of the extractive industry in Africa during the colonial period. We present a critical and historical perspective on the role of colonial subjugation that took the form of discriminatory policies and lack of accountability, in laying the foundations for the current challenges of continuous informalization of the indigenous gold mining sector and its implications on livelihoods, the economy and the environment in Ghana. We analyzed archival data on the mining industry in Ghana, consisting of official correspondences between colonial bureaucrats in Britain and Ghana, as well as colonial policies on mining, interpreted through the lenses of institutional theory. Specifically, we used records comprising letters, mineral policies, mineral output, and labor relations in the Gold Coast during the colonial period as well as minutes of meetings held by those governing mining enterprises that operated in Ghana before 1957. We also drew on periodic reports of the Ghana Chamber of Mines and their member enterprises, Government of Ghana white papers, parliamentary records among others. We found that the colonial authority, as the new institutional power with vested interest in the extractive industry, adopted discriminatory policies that banned small-scale gold mining by indigenous population in Ghana, marginalizing the sector's operation to the advantage of foreign large-scale gold miners. We demonstrate that the control of mineral resources by the colonial authority under new ownership structures disenfranchised the indigenous population and their right to the mineral resources of the Gold Coast. We argue that this institutionalized discriminatory policy, and the resulting lack of accountability is largely responsible for the ongoing informalization of Ghana's small-scale gold mining sector. This paper contributes to the corpus of critical and historical scholarship that investigates the role of racialization and accountability during colonial period, but with notable distinction that departs from specific professional or disciplinary perspectives. Instead, it focuses on the colonial subjugation and exploitation of the small-scale gold mining sector and its ongoing informalization that traces its roots to the era of British colonial rule in Ghana. It reiterates the need for accountability for these historical inequalities affecting the small-scale mining operators, to facilitate the sector's formalization and to effectively control and manage the myriads of negative impacts associated with it.

Abstract Image

非洲采掘业的非正式化核算:来自殖民时期加纳小规模金矿开采部门的证据
在本文中,我们利用问责制和制度理论来解释加纳小规模金矿开采部门的非正式状态,作为殖民时期非洲采掘业非正式化的一个范例。我们对以歧视性政策和缺乏问责制为形式的殖民征服的作用提出了批判和历史的观点,为当前土著金矿开采部门不断非正式化的挑战及其对加纳生计、经济和环境的影响奠定了基础。我们分析了加纳采矿业的档案数据,包括英国和加纳殖民官僚之间的官方通信,以及通过制度理论透镜解释的殖民采矿政策。具体来说,我们使用的记录包括殖民时期黄金海岸的信件、矿产政策、矿产产量和劳资关系,以及1957年前在加纳经营的管理矿业企业举行的会议记录。我们还参考了加纳矿业商会及其成员企业的定期报告、加纳政府白皮书、议会记录等。我们发现,殖民当局作为在采掘业中拥有既得利益的新体制权力,采取了歧视性政策,禁止加纳土著人口的小规模金矿开采,使该部门的运营边缘化,有利于外国大型金矿开采商。我们表明,殖民当局在新的所有权结构下对矿产资源的控制剥夺了土著居民的公民权,剥夺了他们对黄金海岸矿产资源的权利。我们认为,这种制度化的歧视性政策,以及由此导致的问责制缺失,在很大程度上导致了加纳小规模金矿开采部门的持续非正式化。本文为研究殖民时期种族化和问责制的关键和历史学术贡献了语料,但从特定的专业或学科角度出发,有明显的区别。相反,它关注的是殖民征服和对小规模金矿开采部门的剥削,以及其正在进行的非正式化,其根源可追溯到英国在加纳殖民统治的时代。它重申必须对影响小型采矿经营者的这些历史上的不平等负责,以促进该部门的正规化,并有效地控制和管理与此有关的无数不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信