Comprehensive Investigation of Airborne Benzalkonium Ion Behavior Following Nebulization: Implications for Indoor Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1155/ina/3951534
Sion Lee, Eunwoo Choi, So Yeon Lee, Minji Kim, Joo Hyon Kim, Han Bin Oh
{"title":"Comprehensive Investigation of Airborne Benzalkonium Ion Behavior Following Nebulization: Implications for Indoor Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment","authors":"Sion Lee,&nbsp;Eunwoo Choi,&nbsp;So Yeon Lee,&nbsp;Minji Kim,&nbsp;Joo Hyon Kim,&nbsp;Han Bin Oh","doi":"10.1155/ina/3951534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the use of quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) disinfectants, raising concerns about potential health effects. This study investigated the airborne behavior of benzalkonium chloride (BKC), a common QAC, sprayed at 500 ppm for 4 min in a 105 m<sup>3</sup> space using automatic and manual methods. Airborne BKC was collected via an air pump and quantified using LC-ESI-MRM/MS. Results showed that BKC concentrations peaked during spraying but rapidly decreased thereafter, becoming negligible within 8–12 min postspraying. Cumulative capture exhibited a sigmoidal trend with time, with maximum captures of 8.21 <i>μ</i>g (front) and 1.36 <i>μ</i>g (back) for automatic spraying, and 0.14 <i>μ</i>g (front) and 0.29 <i>μ</i>g (back) for manual spraying. The “exposure to spray model” was applied to determine parameters such as airborne fraction and settling velocity. Hazard quotients (HQs) were calculated based on the maximum cumulative captures, with all values remaining below 1, indicating minimal health risks. Specifically, for the automatic sprayer, HQs were 0.856 (front) and 0.142 (rear), while for the manual sprayer, they were 0.015 (front) and 0.030 (rear). The highest HQ of 0.856, observed for automatic spraying at the front location, suggests that some caution may be warranted in this scenario. The study demonstrates that while BKC concentrations can be significant during spraying, they decrease rapidly postapplication, leading to limited exposure risks. These findings provide valuable insights into the safe use of QAC disinfectants and their impact on indoor air quality, particularly relevant in the context of increased disinfectant practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/3951534","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/3951534","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the use of quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) disinfectants, raising concerns about potential health effects. This study investigated the airborne behavior of benzalkonium chloride (BKC), a common QAC, sprayed at 500 ppm for 4 min in a 105 m3 space using automatic and manual methods. Airborne BKC was collected via an air pump and quantified using LC-ESI-MRM/MS. Results showed that BKC concentrations peaked during spraying but rapidly decreased thereafter, becoming negligible within 8–12 min postspraying. Cumulative capture exhibited a sigmoidal trend with time, with maximum captures of 8.21 μg (front) and 1.36 μg (back) for automatic spraying, and 0.14 μg (front) and 0.29 μg (back) for manual spraying. The “exposure to spray model” was applied to determine parameters such as airborne fraction and settling velocity. Hazard quotients (HQs) were calculated based on the maximum cumulative captures, with all values remaining below 1, indicating minimal health risks. Specifically, for the automatic sprayer, HQs were 0.856 (front) and 0.142 (rear), while for the manual sprayer, they were 0.015 (front) and 0.030 (rear). The highest HQ of 0.856, observed for automatic spraying at the front location, suggests that some caution may be warranted in this scenario. The study demonstrates that while BKC concentrations can be significant during spraying, they decrease rapidly postapplication, leading to limited exposure risks. These findings provide valuable insights into the safe use of QAC disinfectants and their impact on indoor air quality, particularly relevant in the context of increased disinfectant practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信