Reanalysis of historical earthquakes to improve seismic hazard assessment: Case study of the 1880 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Snježana Markušić, Davor Stanko, Ivica Sović, Marijan Kovačić, Bruno Mravlja, Iva Žilić
{"title":"Reanalysis of historical earthquakes to improve seismic hazard assessment: Case study of the 1880 Zagreb (Croatia) earthquake","authors":"Snježana Markušić,&nbsp;Davor Stanko,&nbsp;Ivica Sović,&nbsp;Marijan Kovačić,&nbsp;Bruno Mravlja,&nbsp;Iva Žilić","doi":"10.1007/s11200-024-0820-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The earthquake of 9 November 1880 was one of the most important moments in the seismic history of Zagreb (Croatia). It is the strongest earthquake to have occurred in the greater Zagreb area, and as such it defines the seismic hazard in northwestern Croatia, the most populated part of the country. The main objective of this study was to reanalyze the location and magnitude of the earthquake, the input parameters which are crucial for a better assessment of seismic hazard, as there were macroseismic indications that the previous assessments should be revised. In addition, the strongest aftershock occurred two days after the main event, so it can be assumed that the observed intensities were caused by the cumulative effect of these two events. Therefore, a new isoseismal map was created, synthetic macroseismic modelling was performed and additional geophysical and microtremor measurements were taken. Based on all the information collected, the attempt to separate the effects of the strongest aftershock from the effects of the mainshock (to avoid a cumulative effect), a new assessment of the location of the epicentre of the main 1880 earthquake in Zagreb and its magnitude was made. When it comes to historical earthquakes, from a seismological point of view, even small improvements in the definition of the main seismological parameters of an earthquake significant for a given area are very important - for a better understanding of the geodynamics of the area, the earthquake mechanism and the spatial distribution of damage after the earthquake, as well as for the consistent assessment of seismic hazard and thus risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"69 1","pages":"22 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-024-0820-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The earthquake of 9 November 1880 was one of the most important moments in the seismic history of Zagreb (Croatia). It is the strongest earthquake to have occurred in the greater Zagreb area, and as such it defines the seismic hazard in northwestern Croatia, the most populated part of the country. The main objective of this study was to reanalyze the location and magnitude of the earthquake, the input parameters which are crucial for a better assessment of seismic hazard, as there were macroseismic indications that the previous assessments should be revised. In addition, the strongest aftershock occurred two days after the main event, so it can be assumed that the observed intensities were caused by the cumulative effect of these two events. Therefore, a new isoseismal map was created, synthetic macroseismic modelling was performed and additional geophysical and microtremor measurements were taken. Based on all the information collected, the attempt to separate the effects of the strongest aftershock from the effects of the mainshock (to avoid a cumulative effect), a new assessment of the location of the epicentre of the main 1880 earthquake in Zagreb and its magnitude was made. When it comes to historical earthquakes, from a seismological point of view, even small improvements in the definition of the main seismological parameters of an earthquake significant for a given area are very important - for a better understanding of the geodynamics of the area, the earthquake mechanism and the spatial distribution of damage after the earthquake, as well as for the consistent assessment of seismic hazard and thus risk.

历史地震的再分析以改进地震危险性评估:以1880年萨格勒布(克罗地亚)地震为例
1880年11月9日的地震是萨格勒布(克罗地亚)地震史上最重要的时刻之一。这是大萨格勒布地区发生的最强烈的地震,因此它定义了克罗地亚人口最多的地区西北部的地震危险。这项研究的主要目的是重新分析地震的位置和震级,这些输入参数对于更好地评估地震危害至关重要,因为有宏观地震迹象表明,之前的评估应该进行修订。此外,最强余震发生在主震后2天,因此可以认为观测到的强度是由这两个事件的累积效应引起的。因此,建立了新的等震图,进行了综合大地震模拟,并进行了额外的地球物理和微震测量。基于收集到的所有信息,试图将最强余震的影响与主震的影响分开(以避免累积效应),对1880年萨格勒布大地震的震中位置及其震级进行了新的评估。当涉及到历史上的地震时,从地震学的角度来看,对某一特定地区具有重大意义的地震的主要地震学参数的定义哪怕是很小的改进都是非常重要的——这有助于更好地了解该地区的地球动力学、地震机制和地震后破坏的空间分布,以及对地震危害和风险的一致评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信