Evaluation of GOCE/GRACE and combined global geopotential models using GNSS/levelling data over Nigeria

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Michael Bako, Basem Elsaka, Jürgen Kusche, Luciana Fenoglio-Marc
{"title":"Evaluation of GOCE/GRACE and combined global geopotential models using GNSS/levelling data over Nigeria","authors":"Michael Bako,&nbsp;Basem Elsaka,&nbsp;Jürgen Kusche,&nbsp;Luciana Fenoglio-Marc","doi":"10.1007/s11200-023-0804-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) provide valuable information about Earth’s gravity field functionals, such as geoid heights and gravity anomalies. However, ground-based datasets are required to validate these GGMs at the regional and local scales. In this study, we validated the accuracy of GGMs by comparing them with ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/levelling data for the first time in Nigeria. We employed two validation scenarios: with and without considering spectral consistency using the spectral enhancement method (SEM) to incorporate high and very high frequencies of the gravity field spectrum from the combined global gravity field model (XGM2019e_2159) and the residual terrain model (RTM) derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data, respectively. The results of this evaluation confirmed that the application of SEM improved the assessment of the GGM solutions in an unbiased manner. Integrating XGM2019e_2159 and SRTM data to constrain the high-frequency component of geoid heights in Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE)-based GGMs led to an improvement of approximately 10% in reducing the standard deviation (STD) relative to when SEM was not applied. GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R6 at spherical harmonics (SH) of up to degree and order 260 demonstrated the lowest STD when compared to GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R6 and GO_CONS_GCF_2_SPW_R5, with a reduction from 0.380 m without SEM application to 0.342 m with SEM implementation. In addition, four transformation models, namely, linear, four-parameter, five-parameter, and seven-parameter models, were evaluated. The objective is to mitigate the reference system offsets between the GNSS/levelling data and the GGMs and to identify the particular parametric model with the smallest STD across all GGMs. This effort reduced the GGMs misfits to GNSS/levelling to 0.30 m, representing a 15.3% decrease in STD. Notably, the XGM2019e_2159 model provides this improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"69 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11200-023-0804-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-023-0804-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) provide valuable information about Earth’s gravity field functionals, such as geoid heights and gravity anomalies. However, ground-based datasets are required to validate these GGMs at the regional and local scales. In this study, we validated the accuracy of GGMs by comparing them with ground-based Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/levelling data for the first time in Nigeria. We employed two validation scenarios: with and without considering spectral consistency using the spectral enhancement method (SEM) to incorporate high and very high frequencies of the gravity field spectrum from the combined global gravity field model (XGM2019e_2159) and the residual terrain model (RTM) derived from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data, respectively. The results of this evaluation confirmed that the application of SEM improved the assessment of the GGM solutions in an unbiased manner. Integrating XGM2019e_2159 and SRTM data to constrain the high-frequency component of geoid heights in Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE)-based GGMs led to an improvement of approximately 10% in reducing the standard deviation (STD) relative to when SEM was not applied. GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R6 at spherical harmonics (SH) of up to degree and order 260 demonstrated the lowest STD when compared to GO_CONS_GCF_2_DIR_R6 and GO_CONS_GCF_2_SPW_R5, with a reduction from 0.380 m without SEM application to 0.342 m with SEM implementation. In addition, four transformation models, namely, linear, four-parameter, five-parameter, and seven-parameter models, were evaluated. The objective is to mitigate the reference system offsets between the GNSS/levelling data and the GGMs and to identify the particular parametric model with the smallest STD across all GGMs. This effort reduced the GGMs misfits to GNSS/levelling to 0.30 m, representing a 15.3% decrease in STD. Notably, the XGM2019e_2159 model provides this improvement.

利用尼日利亚的GNSS/水准数据评估GOCE/GRACE和联合全球地势模型
全球地势模型(GGMs)提供了有关地球重力场功能的宝贵信息,如大地水准面高度和重力异常。但是,需要地面数据集来在区域和地方尺度上验证这些GGMs。在这项研究中,我们首次在尼日利亚通过将GGMs与地面全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)/找平数据进行比较,验证了GGMs的准确性。采用光谱增强方法(SEM)对全球重力场组合模型(XGM2019e_2159)和基于航天飞机雷达地形任务(SRTM)数据的残差地形模型(RTM)的重力场频谱进行了高频段和甚高频的合并验证。该评价的结果证实了SEM的应用以公正的方式改进了对GGM解决方案的评价。结合XGM2019e_2159和SRTM数据约束重力场和基于稳态海洋环流探测器(GOCE)的GGMs大地水准面高度高频分量,相对于不应用SEM时,降低标准偏差(STD)提高了约10%。与go_con_gcf_2_dir_r6和go_con_gcf_2_spw_r5相比,go_con_gcf_2_tim_r6在高达260阶的球面谐波(SH)处表现出最低的STD,从未使用SEM的0.380 m减少到使用SEM的0.342 m。此外,还对线性、四参数、五参数和七参数四种转换模型进行了评价。目标是减轻GNSS/调平数据与ggm之间的参考系统偏移,并确定在所有ggm中具有最小STD的特定参数模型。这一努力将GGMs与GNSS/调平的不匹配降低到0.30 m, STD降低了15.3%。值得注意的是,XGM2019e_2159模型提供了这一改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信