Traveling Disturbances in Airglow at 630.0 nm during Impact of High-Frequency Radio Emission of the SURA Facility on Ionosphere

IF 0.9 Q4 OPTICS
A. B. Beletsky, I. A. Nasyrov, T. E. Syrenova, D. A. Kogogin, V. O. Dementiev, S. V. Podlesny, V. V. Emelyanov, R. V. Vasiliev
{"title":"Traveling Disturbances in Airglow at 630.0 nm during Impact of High-Frequency Radio Emission of the SURA Facility on Ionosphere","authors":"A. B. Beletsky,&nbsp;I. A. Nasyrov,&nbsp;T. E. Syrenova,&nbsp;D. A. Kogogin,&nbsp;V. O. Dementiev,&nbsp;S. V. Podlesny,&nbsp;V. V. Emelyanov,&nbsp;R. V. Vasiliev","doi":"10.1134/S1024856024701409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper analyzes the a large set of data of experimental campaigns from 2012 to 2022 aimed at recording the ionospheric glow during the periods of impact of high-power radio emission from the SURA facility. The detection of traveling wave disturbances manifested in the 630 nm atomic oxygen airglow caused by the effect of the SURA facility was the goal of this analysis. Except for two cases, no differences were found between periods with and without the effect of radio emissions from the SURA facility on the ionosphere. On August 7 and 10, 2021, weak wave structures similar in form and subsequent behavior were detected; they were moving in opposite directions from the SURA facility site with a length of at least 400 km. On August 7, 2021, the estimated front velocity was ∼104 m/s to the southwest and ∼127 m/s to the northeast. On August 10, 2021, the front velocity was ∼71 m/s and ∼142 m/s along the same directions, respectively. No such structures with such behavior were recorded by us before. The complex analysis of the heliogeomagnetic and ionospheric data for the experimental session in August 2021, including the days when traveling wave structures were detected, is presented in the paper. Unfortunately, we cannot unambiguously associate the detected traveling wave structures with the pumping regime of the SURA facility at that time. The source of these wave structures is still unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":46751,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","volume":"37 1 supplement","pages":"S199 - S207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024701409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzes the a large set of data of experimental campaigns from 2012 to 2022 aimed at recording the ionospheric glow during the periods of impact of high-power radio emission from the SURA facility. The detection of traveling wave disturbances manifested in the 630 nm atomic oxygen airglow caused by the effect of the SURA facility was the goal of this analysis. Except for two cases, no differences were found between periods with and without the effect of radio emissions from the SURA facility on the ionosphere. On August 7 and 10, 2021, weak wave structures similar in form and subsequent behavior were detected; they were moving in opposite directions from the SURA facility site with a length of at least 400 km. On August 7, 2021, the estimated front velocity was ∼104 m/s to the southwest and ∼127 m/s to the northeast. On August 10, 2021, the front velocity was ∼71 m/s and ∼142 m/s along the same directions, respectively. No such structures with such behavior were recorded by us before. The complex analysis of the heliogeomagnetic and ionospheric data for the experimental session in August 2021, including the days when traveling wave structures were detected, is presented in the paper. Unfortunately, we cannot unambiguously associate the detected traveling wave structures with the pumping regime of the SURA facility at that time. The source of these wave structures is still unclear.

Abstract Image

SURA设施高频射电辐射对电离层影响时630.0 nm气辉的行扰动
本文分析了2012年至2022年在SURA设施高功率无线电发射影响期间记录电离层辉光的大量实验活动数据。本分析的目的是检测由SURA设备的影响引起的630 nm原子氧气辉中的行波扰动。除两种情况外,在有和没有SURA设施的无线电发射对电离层产生影响的时期之间没有发现差异。2021年8月7日和10日,探测到形式和后续行为相似的弱波结构;它们从SURA设施向相反方向移动,长度至少为400公里。2021年8月7日,预计锋面速度在西南方向为~ 104 m/s,在东北方向为~ 127 m/s。2021年8月10日,同一方向的锋面速度分别为~ 71 m/s和~ 142 m/s。我们之前没有记录到有这种行为的结构。本文对2021年8月实验时段的日地磁和电离层数据进行了复杂的分析,包括探测到行波结构的日子。不幸的是,我们不能明确地将探测到的行波结构与当时SURA设施的泵送状态联系起来。这些波浪结构的来源尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
42.90%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics  is an international peer reviewed journal that presents experimental and theoretical articles relevant to a wide range of problems of atmospheric and oceanic optics, ecology, and climate. The journal coverage includes: scattering and transfer of optical waves, spectroscopy of atmospheric gases, turbulent and nonlinear optical phenomena, adaptive optics, remote (ground-based, airborne, and spaceborne) sensing of the atmosphere and the surface, methods for solving of inverse problems, new equipment for optical investigations, development of computer programs and databases for optical studies. Thematic issues are devoted to the studies of atmospheric ozone, adaptive, nonlinear, and coherent optics, regional climate and environmental monitoring, and other subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信