Word perception and upper-lower visual field asymmetries

IF 2.2 3区心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

Brain and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-03-24 DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106294

Deborah J. Serrien, Louise O’Regan

{"title":"Word perception and upper-lower visual field asymmetries","authors":"Deborah J. Serrien, Louise O’Regan","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Left-hemispheric lateralisation generally associates with superiority of language processing, facilitated by specialist representational and attentional influences, albeit characterised by individual differences due to handedness. In this research, we examine perceptual processing of linguistic input in left- and right-handers, and assess lateral asymmetries in the vertical dimension that is embedded within upper-lower visual fields. We use a behavioural design with presentation of bilateral stimuli (upper or lower) visual field locations during match and mismatch conditions. The data revealed that both groups were more successful in the upper than lower visual field. However, left- as compared to right-handers demonstrated increased processing in these locations, indicating beneficial effects that point to stronger perceptual responsiveness. The observations are indicative of intrinsic cross-hemispheric biases as well as acquired patterns due to perceptuo-motor experiences. In addition, hand and eye preference facilitated responses in bilateral upper visual field locations. The findings propose intricate connections between manual and attentional control with perceptual asymmetries that are steered by dedicated mechanisms. In conclusion, the data illustrate that hand and eye preference act as mediators that guide responding to visual input within the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027826262500034X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left-hemispheric lateralisation generally associates with superiority of language processing, facilitated by specialist representational and attentional influences, albeit characterised by individual differences due to handedness. In this research, we examine perceptual processing of linguistic input in left- and right-handers, and assess lateral asymmetries in the vertical dimension that is embedded within upper-lower visual fields. We use a behavioural design with presentation of bilateral stimuli (upper or lower) visual field locations during match and mismatch conditions. The data revealed that both groups were more successful in the upper than lower visual field. However, left- as compared to right-handers demonstrated increased processing in these locations, indicating beneficial effects that point to stronger perceptual responsiveness. The observations are indicative of intrinsic cross-hemispheric biases as well as acquired patterns due to perceptuo-motor experiences. In addition, hand and eye preference facilitated responses in bilateral upper visual field locations. The findings propose intricate connections between manual and attentional control with perceptual asymmetries that are steered by dedicated mechanisms. In conclusion, the data illustrate that hand and eye preference act as mediators that guide responding to visual input within the environment.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.